Sentences with phrase «conclusion in her book review»

Joanna Bogle's conclusion in her book review of Martin Blake's «Marthe Robin and the Foyers of Charity», that it would be rather good to have one in Britain, is absolutely correct.

Not exact matches

See also Professor Gerd Ludemann's review and conclusions in his book, Jesus After 2000 Years especially p. 93.

It would be unfair to draw wholesale conclusions about his understanding of the moral authority that inheres in law from a book review, but he apparently holds the view that conscientious reflection on enhanced interrogation need consult neither norms of international law nor codes of professional conduct.

In reviewing a book on the influence of the Bible, the author comes to two conclusions about the book: 1.

Cairo, also first vice chairman of the Nassau Republican Committee, said, «If we said [OTB would make payment] during the fiscal year, we meant that at the end of the fiscal year, we would review our books, do our filings and then after seeing that everything was in order, we would then also remit to the county the money they were due within a reasonable period of time at the conclusion of the fiscal year.»

Please read my Forks Over Knives review for more information on what's wrong with the conclusions drawn from Campbell's casein / aflatoxin research, and if you'd rather look at peer - reviewed research than the words of some random internet blogger, see my collection of scientific papers based on the China Study data that contradict the claims in Campbell's book.

Manuscript Review Seasoned members of the Guild, including those who have successfully published a fiction or non-fiction book, will review a manuscript up to thirty pages of a member's work - in - progress and provide feedback on flow, character development, point of view, description, whatever the writer needs to bring his or her work to a successful conclReview Seasoned members of the Guild, including those who have successfully published a fiction or non-fiction book, will review a manuscript up to thirty pages of a member's work - in - progress and provide feedback on flow, character development, point of view, description, whatever the writer needs to bring his or her work to a successful conclreview a manuscript up to thirty pages of a member's work - in - progress and provide feedback on flow, character development, point of view, description, whatever the writer needs to bring his or her work to a successful conclusion.

Seasoned members of the Guild, including those who have successfully published a fiction or non-fiction book, will review a manuscript up to thirty pages of a member's work - in - progress and provide feedback on flow, character development, point of view, description, whatever the writer needs to bring his or her work to a successful conclusion.

It's really hard to believe that someone in that position thinks that regurgitating conclusions from a book constitutes a «review».

The trouble with Pielke's argument is that the work of Muir - Wood and his colleagues was eventually published as a peer - reviewed paper in 2008 (and included as chapter 12 of the book Climate Extremes of Society) and included the same conclusion.

The work of epidemiologists Wilkinson and Pickett (2009) has illuminated the impact of this rise in inequality bringing an array of evidence in their book, The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Always do Better, to reach conclusions that have been the subject of considerable debate and critique (for a good review see Rowlingson, 2011).