Sentences with phrase «conclusion of leading scientists»

INDEPENDENT & FOREIGN FILMS Cool It (PG for mature themes) Eco-documentary chronicling the efforts of skeptical, Danish environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg to debunk the prevailing conclusion of leading scientists that global warming trends are man - made.

Not exact matches

This same lack seems to lead to his being somewhat uncritical of the quasi-theological conclusions of certain scientists.

There are many who refuse to accept the conclusions of the world's leading, most eminent scientists and scholars.

That is, that one of the main reasons for his attack on Darwinism is his conclusion that insufficiently critical adoption of evolutionary modes of thought by the majority of scientists, and also by educational (e.g., John Dewey) and legal (e.g., Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.) leaders, has led to a highly unsatisfactory cultural situation, and to many evil consequences.

Schwarzschild found a solution that led scientists to the conclusion that a region of space could become so warped that it would create a gravitational well that no object could escape.

Observations of the explosions of white dwarf stars in binary systems, so - called Type Ia supernovae, in the 1990s then led scientists to the conclusion that a third component, dark energy, made up 68 % of the cosmos, and is responsible for driving an acceleration in the expansion of the universe.

To reach their conclusions, a team led by Urs Kormann, a post-doctoral scientist in the College of Forestry at Oregon State University, surveyed bird communities in 49 forest fragments near the Las Cruces Biological Station in Costa Rica.

The scholars attribute this bias to the norms of scientific discourse: «The scientific values of rationality, dispassion, and self - restraint tend to lead scientists to demand greater levels of evidence in support of surprising, dramatic, or alarming conclusions.»

Scientists at the University Hospital of Parma came to the conclusion that magnesium deficiency in older men lead to lower testosterone and IGF - 1 levels in their blood.

Again, I can't summarize the research that lead to this conclusion (read the book and see what you think) but basically Haidt lays out a case that says if you believe that you are some sort of scientist guided solely by sweet reason and evidence, you are the victim of self - delusion.

This oversight has led to inaccurate conclusions regarding the benefits of positive punishment by pet parents, trainers and some scientists as well.

Timothy Chase (171): Of course, the response to your reasonable conclusion is usually (as expressed to me by one of the leading practitioners of the Chewbacca defense) is that scientists are engaged in «groupthink.&raquOf course, the response to your reasonable conclusion is usually (as expressed to me by one of the leading practitioners of the Chewbacca defense) is that scientists are engaged in «groupthink.&raquof the leading practitioners of the Chewbacca defense) is that scientists are engaged in «groupthink.&raquof the Chewbacca defense) is that scientists are engaged in «groupthink.»

My conclusion was sincerely derived by looking at the (im) probabilities of the actions needed to be taken as spelled out by our leading scientists.

The academies» statement is just the latest rejection of the conclusions by the paper's authors, led by Gilles - Eric Séralini, a scientist at the University of Caen who has long campaigned against genetically modified foods and attracted criticism for flawed science.

A broad array of leading climate scientists and policy specialists were also criticizing the panel for the exact opposite reason: They believe the main conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) may be too general and too conservative to convey a clear message about the grave threat of warming and to inform policies to address local climate change issues.

The scholars attribute this bias to the norms of scientific discourse: «The scientific values of rationality, dispassion, and self - restraint tend to lead scientists to demand greater levels of evidence in support of surprising, dramatic, or alarming conclusions.»

Leading to the conclusion that if scientists are unable to advocate based on their understanding of scientific results and their own values, then no experts or person with competence in a field should be allowed to advocate based on their understanding of that field.

But whether I do or not, the force of your logic would lead to the conclusion that everyone who claims to be a «climate scientist» is explicitly associated with the disgraceful behaviour shown in climategate.

Lord Oxburgh, who led the second investigation, said that many of the criticisms and claims of scientific misconduct were likely made by people «who do not like the implications of some of the conclusions» reached by the scientists in question.

One group of leading climate scientists who analysed carter's paper concluded that the conclusions he and his co-authors drew were «not supported by their analysis or any physical theory presented in their paper».

Spectral analysis, unless properly understood may lead to very misleading conclusions, here are shown four essential things one needs to be aware of all the time: On the other hand there are again unnoticeable data curiosities, this graph shows an unusual configuration within one of the top five temperature data sets used by the climate scientists in their calculations, predictions and computer models.

A panel of top American scientists declared today that global warming was a real problem and was getting worse, a conclusion that may lead President Bush to change his stand on the issue as he heads next week to Europe, where the United States is seen as a major source of the air pollution held responsible for climate change.

When it comes to climate science, Donald Trump arrogantly shows his total lack of intellectual curiosity and disdainfully rejects the world's leading scientists» and scientific institutions conclusion that

Now go read IPCC 2007 Working Group 1, chapter 8.4 and tell me if everything in the conclusion of this paper isn't already backed up by the worlds leading climate scientists.

All of this leads to an uncomfortable conclusion — one that the climate scientist James Hansen came to recently: nuclear power has actually saved 1.8 million lives.

When it comes to climate science, Donald Trump arrogantly shows his total lack of intellectual curiosity and disdainfully rejects the world's leading scientists» and scientific institutions conclusion that climate change is real humanity is driving this change this is creating serious risks Science denial isn't isolated to the Oval Office, it is one of the -LSB-...]

Prashant Goswami, chief scientist at Bangalore's CSIR Centre for Mathematical Modeling and Computer Simulation and one of the lead authors of the IPCC report, admitted that these conclusions were based on climatic projections that were not as firm as those made at a global level.

«I am growing weary of the variety of emotional, misleading, and policy - useless statements like «most warming since the 1950s is human caused» or «97 % of climate scientists agree humans are contributing to warming», neither of which leads to the conclusion we need to substantially increase energy prices and freeze and starve more poor people to death for the greater good.

He's someone who has conservative beliefs (hence his membership in the NAS [National Association of Scholars], whose willfully ignorant leadership and membership he is valiantly trying to educate), and is also a scientist with integrity who believes in scientific facts, including those which lead to conclusions that might conflict with his preferred world - view.

The following year, four scientists led by Ian Stirling of the Canadian Wildlife Service published a critique that found «little support» for those conclusions.

In another, Dr Carter co-authored a paper which claimed natural variation was to blame for recent global warming - a conclusion which a group of leading climate scientists concluded was «not supported by their analysis or any physical theory presented in their paper».