The Canadian Government has asked, through diplomatic channels, for consular access and other assurances, but it is its policy not to request his repatriation until
the conclusion of the prosecution.
At
the conclusion of the prosecution's case, you will testify and have the option to call witnesses as well.
Not exact matches
His
conclusions were scathing: with little investigation or
prosecution of food crime there was a «huge incentive for the criminal to pursue food crime».
«We urge the court to pursue this matter to a satisfactory
conclusion by taking the case forward as required by the provisions
of the Rome Statute, and ensuring a thorough investigation and
prosecution of suspected perpetrators
of grand corruption in the electricity sector in Nigeria,» he added.
Libous» case is one
of three recent, high - profile New York political corruption
prosecutions brought by Southern District U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara that are at or near their
conclusions.
On the war against corruption, although the Church lauded the Federal Government, it urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, «to stop media trials
of suspects in their custody and ensure the
conclusion of investigations before arraignment and
prosecution of alleged offenders.»
Because French was not required to waive his immunity from
prosecution when he testified before the grand jurors, the report said, under state law he can not be prosecuted «regardless
of the ultimate
conclusions» reached by the the attorney general's office.
I can comfortably state that there should be nothing less than disgrace for any scientist that selectively choses data to influence results or overexaggerates
conclusions and most
of us would be in favor
of prosecution if fraud had occured.
In reaching this
conclusion, Arbitrator Stewart stressed that inspectors act in furtherance
of regulatory
prosecutions (as opposed to criminal
prosecutions) and that CPIC data is not directly accessible to the investigating agency (as it is with police).
He served in the US Army infantry during World War II and stayed on at the
conclusion of the War to assist in the war crimes
prosecutions at the Dachau prison camp.
What is more, there are numerous examples
of public inquiries (both statutory and non-statutory) being conducted either in parallel with legal proceedings or when such proceedings were contemplated, from the Ladbroke Grove Rail Crash inquiry to the Bloody Sunday inquiry, since the
conclusion of which there has been considerable discussion
of possible criminal
prosecutions.
As a
conclusion, one can say that the CJEU did not only reply to the question raised by Advocate General Kokott whether «EU law require [s] the courts
of the Member States to refrain from applying certain provisions
of their national law on the limitation periods applicable to the
prosecution of criminal offences in order to guarantee the effective punishment
of tax offences» (§ 1
of the Opinion).
It is readily apparent, in the cases presented to me for investigation, that if detailed and thorough investigation were replaced by a simple few hours
of analysis, and acceptance
of the
prosecution findings at face value, then it is likely that this could in some cases result in erroneous trial
conclusions.
Assuming the Canadian courts continue to exclude consideration
of the patent
prosecution when construing claim terms, it is possible for courts in the United States and Canada to come to opposite
conclusions on the meaning
of claim terms even if the patents are the same.
Conversely, it is the obligation
of the Crown Attorney to withdraw cases from
prosecution when he or she comes to the
conclusion that either there is no reasonable prospect
of conviction or that is not in the public interest to proceed.
The primary basis for this
conclusion was the 2011 decision
of the Federal Court
of Appeal in Corlac Inc v Weatherford Canada Inc., 2011 FCA 228 which in the relevant portion focused on statements made by an applicant to the patent office during
prosecution.
This, the
Prosecution argued, coupled with the use
of pay as you go phones indicated that secrecy was being deployed in order to hide criminal activity, though the defendants denied this and the
conclusion of the jury is not clear cut.
Concerning the second strand
of the
prosecution case, namely the finding
of fibres on TPUs and at the mobile home, Weir J noted that there was no «significant challenge either to the findings or the
conclusions arrived at by those scientists» (Dr Logan and Dr Griffin
of FSNI) on the fibre evidence: «The dispute rather centred on whether the
conclusions did or did not support the
prosecution contention that the N Ireland TPUs were made by one person, the accused.»
com This, the
Prosecution argued, coupled with the use
of pay as you go phones indicated that secrecy was being deployed in order to hide criminal activity, though the defendants denied this and the
conclusion of the jury is not clear cut.
Numerous commentators jumped to the
conclusion that the book was some sort
of recipe to escape
prosecution for international crimes.