Sentences with phrase «conclusion of the prosecution»

The Canadian Government has asked, through diplomatic channels, for consular access and other assurances, but it is its policy not to request his repatriation until the conclusion of the prosecution.
At the conclusion of the prosecution's case, you will testify and have the option to call witnesses as well.

Not exact matches

His conclusions were scathing: with little investigation or prosecution of food crime there was a «huge incentive for the criminal to pursue food crime».
«We urge the court to pursue this matter to a satisfactory conclusion by taking the case forward as required by the provisions of the Rome Statute, and ensuring a thorough investigation and prosecution of suspected perpetrators of grand corruption in the electricity sector in Nigeria,» he added.
Libous» case is one of three recent, high - profile New York political corruption prosecutions brought by Southern District U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara that are at or near their conclusions.
On the war against corruption, although the Church lauded the Federal Government, it urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, «to stop media trials of suspects in their custody and ensure the conclusion of investigations before arraignment and prosecution of alleged offenders.»
Because French was not required to waive his immunity from prosecution when he testified before the grand jurors, the report said, under state law he can not be prosecuted «regardless of the ultimate conclusions» reached by the the attorney general's office.
I can comfortably state that there should be nothing less than disgrace for any scientist that selectively choses data to influence results or overexaggerates conclusions and most of us would be in favor of prosecution if fraud had occured.
In reaching this conclusion, Arbitrator Stewart stressed that inspectors act in furtherance of regulatory prosecutions (as opposed to criminal prosecutions) and that CPIC data is not directly accessible to the investigating agency (as it is with police).
He served in the US Army infantry during World War II and stayed on at the conclusion of the War to assist in the war crimes prosecutions at the Dachau prison camp.
What is more, there are numerous examples of public inquiries (both statutory and non-statutory) being conducted either in parallel with legal proceedings or when such proceedings were contemplated, from the Ladbroke Grove Rail Crash inquiry to the Bloody Sunday inquiry, since the conclusion of which there has been considerable discussion of possible criminal prosecutions.
As a conclusion, one can say that the CJEU did not only reply to the question raised by Advocate General Kokott whether «EU law require [s] the courts of the Member States to refrain from applying certain provisions of their national law on the limitation periods applicable to the prosecution of criminal offences in order to guarantee the effective punishment of tax offences» (§ 1 of the Opinion).
It is readily apparent, in the cases presented to me for investigation, that if detailed and thorough investigation were replaced by a simple few hours of analysis, and acceptance of the prosecution findings at face value, then it is likely that this could in some cases result in erroneous trial conclusions.
Assuming the Canadian courts continue to exclude consideration of the patent prosecution when construing claim terms, it is possible for courts in the United States and Canada to come to opposite conclusions on the meaning of claim terms even if the patents are the same.
Conversely, it is the obligation of the Crown Attorney to withdraw cases from prosecution when he or she comes to the conclusion that either there is no reasonable prospect of conviction or that is not in the public interest to proceed.
The primary basis for this conclusion was the 2011 decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Corlac Inc v Weatherford Canada Inc., 2011 FCA 228 which in the relevant portion focused on statements made by an applicant to the patent office during prosecution.
This, the Prosecution argued, coupled with the use of pay as you go phones indicated that secrecy was being deployed in order to hide criminal activity, though the defendants denied this and the conclusion of the jury is not clear cut.
Concerning the second strand of the prosecution case, namely the finding of fibres on TPUs and at the mobile home, Weir J noted that there was no «significant challenge either to the findings or the conclusions arrived at by those scientists» (Dr Logan and Dr Griffin of FSNI) on the fibre evidence: «The dispute rather centred on whether the conclusions did or did not support the prosecution contention that the N Ireland TPUs were made by one person, the accused.»
com This, the Prosecution argued, coupled with the use of pay as you go phones indicated that secrecy was being deployed in order to hide criminal activity, though the defendants denied this and the conclusion of the jury is not clear cut.
Numerous commentators jumped to the conclusion that the book was some sort of recipe to escape prosecution for international crimes.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z