Sentences with phrase «conclusions about reality»

True, true... we really must take the time to consider if some climatologists have switched to Bayesian statistics because Frequentist statistics fails to yield conclusions about reality that AGW True Believers are willing to accept.

He draws his conclusions about reality mainly from existential and personalistic, Western European philosophy, Roman Catholic (neo --RRB- thomist theology and certain branches of Indian philosophy.

Not exact matches

«If you're not going to be in the top half of the class, you're going to run the risk of mistakenly thinking that you are not a good student, of coming to a conclusion about your own abilities that's at odds with reality.»

While we do not all necessarily agree with the manner in which he dealt with the conclusion of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, we sincerely believe that his abrupt and belated termination for this conduct, occurring months later and on the heels of his public testimony about his oversight of the investigation of Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election, has the appearance — if not the reality — of interfering with that investigation.

@ Derrick Yu, This actually may come as a shocker, but there are believers out there who still continue to ask questions about God, about the Universe, and so forth, and unlike certain atheists out there who if they can't get definite answers to just come to conclusions that can not be verified like conclude that there is no God, at least there are believers out there who at least are willing to at least be open to the possibility that there is a God, and from there they develop their faith, which even though is not a perfect knowledge, at least can help keep those minds open, unlike certain atheists who take the easy way out and convincing themselves that it is a fact that there is no God, when in reality it is not a fact at all.

A major difference, however, between Bergson's theory and James's notion of the stream of thought as outlined in his Psychology is a matter of stress: whereas James, in the Psychology, was hesitant in extending his conclusions beyond the flow of our experience itself, 1 Bergson was always concerned primarily with what is revealed in our experience about the nature of reality, and in particular the nature of time.

In this system, pushed to its logical conclusion, it becomes impossible to say or know anything about God because God is a transcendental reality and therefore beyond words orconcepts.

But in her selection of subjects — Promise Keepers and porn stars, ex-shipyard and aircraft workers, Vietnam veterans and militiamen, notorious street gang figures and members of the Spur Posse — Miss Faludi shaped her conclusions before she had conducted her interviews, revealing more about contemporary journalism than about the reality of men's choices.

This conclusion is not only a biological claim; it is also a claim about the nature of reality.

The reality of past events is partially preserved as newly synthesized elements in later events but fully and infallibly in the never - failing memory of God.51 Hartshorne explains further that a denial of the full reality of the past would entail the conclusion that no true statements could be made about the determinate character of past events («Lincoln was assassinated»), whereas acceptance of his doctrine of the nonactuality of the future entails the falsity of all statements that ascribe completely determinate character to future events.52 «Maybe» is the only correct mode of reference to the future.

Consequently his epistemology avoids the pitfalls of nineteenth century Traditionalism which, carried to its logical conclusion, by undermining the possibility of any rational discourse about reality - and God as its ultimate cause - leads either to radical scepticism or fideism.

Schwartz's conclusion — that today's reality may be tomorrow's discarded truth, and that ideas which run counter to received wisdom should not be dismissed out of hand — is particularly welcome, and a refreshing sentiment from a participant in the current debates about human evolution.

There's nothing Beresford or Stepansky can do about the open - ended reality of the calamity, an arc that leads to an unsatisfying conclusion that probably should have shifted the focus to a look at what Flint looks like in fall 2017 and a clearer call - to - action regarding what can be done there and to prevent similar situations, rather than trying to land on a hollow «inspirational» ending.

OECD analysis finds that about 15 percent of variability in the performance of American students is explained by socio - economic factors; the OECD average is 10 percent.13 Research suggests that if the PISA results of U.S. students are adjusted such that the distribution of low - income students is more similar to other countries with comparable post-industrial economies, both math and reading results would look significantly higher.14 This does not mean the United States should not be concerned about international comparisons of educational achievement, but it suggests that the conclusions drawn from rankings based on national averages are limited and that reality is more nuanced.

In so doing, Dahlby maps out the chilling realities of what radical Islam has planned for us as our worlds inevitably collide — and offers some surprising conclusions about how America's leaders — and its citizens — can best defend our country against Asia's new Osama bin Ladens.

They are, by far, the best objective benchmarks available for use by buy - and - hold fundamentalists as tools essential, most of the time, for reaching reasonable conclusions about what economic reality might be.

The chances are that at some point you've been watching a mindless reality TV show or yet another horrible program about a daft subject and come to the conclusion that if you were in charge of the network you could do so much better than this drivel.

Furthermore, this exhibition expects such a historical experience stretching back generations to serve as one of major pivotal points for profound reflections, rather than to bring about a hasty conclusion, wherefrom we can map out alternative routes to grasp and re-narrate realities.

That 40 % number is a falsehood - there is about a 98 % consensus of all scientists who study this phenomena that anthropogenic climate change is a reality, and every major scientific institution in the world supports the conclusion of man caused global warming.

This means he overestimated solar energy entering the lower Venusian atmosphere by a factor of about 7 so came to the conclusion that he could assume NET surface IR was much greater than reality and imagined it, rather than gravity, causes lapse rate warming.

In conclusion, become mindful about your thoughts because your beliefs are creating your reality.