Sentences with phrase «conclusions as the academy»

Not exact matches

Keister's conclusions are not exactly counterintuitive» except perhaps to members of the academy who can't bring themselves to think of religion as a significant factor in the world.

This is a belated recognition of the conclusions of a meeting of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences as long ago as 1980 that emphasised the worldwide need for nuclear power to provide the energy for an expanding world.

As the season drew towards its conclusion, I investigated the form of Joe Allen following his injury, looked at Jordan Henderson's improvement, and Jonjo Shelvey's appalling shot placement, as well as the contribution that the Reds» academy graduates made, and I wrote a tribute to Jamie Carragher as he pulled down the blind on a sensational Liverpool careeAs the season drew towards its conclusion, I investigated the form of Joe Allen following his injury, looked at Jordan Henderson's improvement, and Jonjo Shelvey's appalling shot placement, as well as the contribution that the Reds» academy graduates made, and I wrote a tribute to Jamie Carragher as he pulled down the blind on a sensational Liverpool careeas well as the contribution that the Reds» academy graduates made, and I wrote a tribute to Jamie Carragher as he pulled down the blind on a sensational Liverpool careeas the contribution that the Reds» academy graduates made, and I wrote a tribute to Jamie Carragher as he pulled down the blind on a sensational Liverpool careeas he pulled down the blind on a sensational Liverpool career.

It takes a similar plot (a girl's inexplicable obsession with a jerk as the crux of a police investigation), similar structure (flashbacks and an unreliable narrator expose the truth of the jerk's vanishing act), similar setting (a gothic academy), and even a similar conclusion (Abandon's is a million times sadder, if atonally winking in and of itself), but Gaghan, besides sparking with his characters in a way that is foreign to the makers of The Hole (there, director Nick Hamm is less interested in compulsion than in repulsion), has no use for sensationalism — The Hole is a piece of tabloid reportage next to Abandon, which wallows humanistically in the epidemic of loneliness.

At a basic level, this implies two possible conclusions: either films with outstanding female lead performances actually aren't as good (on average) as films with outstanding male lead performances, or there's an unfair perception among Academy voters that this is the case.

Consequently, it would be simplistic and misleading to draw firm conclusions and make a singular assessment of academies as a whole.

In a briefing paper prepared for the National Academy of Education (NAE) and the American Educational Research Association, Linda Darling - Hammond and three other distinguished authors reached the following conclusion: «With respect to value - added measures of student achievement tied to individual teachers, current research suggests that high - stakes, individual - level decisions, as well as comparisons across highly dissimilar schools or student populations should be avoided.»

Elizabeth Gray and John Burn have stepped away from the Grindon Hall Christian school in Sunderland as a lengthy takeover by the Bright Tribe academy trust nears its conclusion.

Bill Swafford, DVM, who has served as Executive Director of the Academy of Veterinary Consultants (AVC) for the past 10 years, officially retired from the position with the conclusion of last week's AVC winter confere

has led us to the conclusion, so far, that art is not a free, autonomous activity of a super-endowed individual, «influenced» by previous artists, and, more vaguely and superficially, by «social forces,» but rather, that the total situation of art making, both in terms of the development of the art maker and in the nature and quality of the work of art itself, occur in a social situation, are integral elements of this social structure, and are mediated and determined by specific and definable social institutions, be they art academies, systems of patronage, mythologies of the divine creator, artist as he - man or social outcast.

As John Broder explained on the Green blog and Greenwire laid out in detail, Mary L. Kendall, the inspector general, found that officials under Carol M Browner, the White House coordinator for energy and environment, had changed wording and moved text in a way that made it look as though independent experts assembled by the National Academy of Engineering had not only reviewed and approved of conclusions about safety issues, but also the moratorium recommendatioAs John Broder explained on the Green blog and Greenwire laid out in detail, Mary L. Kendall, the inspector general, found that officials under Carol M Browner, the White House coordinator for energy and environment, had changed wording and moved text in a way that made it look as though independent experts assembled by the National Academy of Engineering had not only reviewed and approved of conclusions about safety issues, but also the moratorium recommendatioas though independent experts assembled by the National Academy of Engineering had not only reviewed and approved of conclusions about safety issues, but also the moratorium recommendation.

Don't take my word for it: that's the conclusion the National Academy of Sciences reached in an «expert consensus» report, which examined numerous empirical studies on the matter and concluded that it was simply impossible to say one way or another whether such laws increase crime or instead decrease it as a result of their effect in deterring violent predation.

And that reality has been demonstrated over and over again, most recently in the work of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, led by Dr. Richard Muller, who began his comprehensive assessment as an avowed climate skeptic and ended it convinced by the clear evidence that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.This conclusion is emphatically shared by the best and brightest of the global scientific community, including our own National Academy of Sciences.

The trap was fully sprung when many of the world's major national academies of science (such as the... Australian Academy of Science) persuaded themselves to issue reports giving support to the conclusions of the IPCC.

On what specific basis do you disregard the mainstream scientific view that holds that the Earth is warming, that the warming is mostly human caused, and that harsh impacts from warming are very likely under business - as - usual, conclusions supported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the United States Academy of Sciences and over a hundred of the most prestigious scientific organizations in the world whose membership includes scientists with expertise relevant to the science of climate change including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and the Royal Society of the UK and according to the American Academy of Sciences 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on climate change?

As the Post noted («Study Confirms Past Few Decades Warmest on Record», June 2, 2006 [link]-RRB-, the academy study backed up the conclusions my colleagues and I reached more than a decade ago about the unprecedented nature of modern climate change.

[¶] The academies of science of the following 33 nations or regions have issued statements accepting global warming as real and human - caused: [lists] He is correct in his hypothesis, AGW is a hoax, and in his conclusion, it is unparalleled.

As if this were not daunting enough, in 2002 the US National Academies of Science not only endorsed the IPCC's conclusions but produced a new report entitled Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable surprises, which argued that global warming may trigger «large, abrupt and unwelcome regional or global climatic events» such as severe droughts and floodAs if this were not daunting enough, in 2002 the US National Academies of Science not only endorsed the IPCC's conclusions but produced a new report entitled Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable surprises, which argued that global warming may trigger «large, abrupt and unwelcome regional or global climatic events» such as severe droughts and floodas severe droughts and floods.

Further, these major conclusions have been objectively reviewed and independently verified by the National Academies of Sciences of all major countries including the U.S., and all relevant scientific organizations such as the American Geophysical Union, American Meteorological Society, American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Royal Society of the United Kingdom.

If this happened, I suspect there would then be a strong temptation among some in the National Academy of Sciences to have NAS publish an official report which essentially adopts the full list of IPCC AR4 conclusions as NAS «principal findings» thus allowing Section III to be neutralized, for all practical purposes.

As climate science denial goes, Roberts» position is as far to the fringe as you can go, mixing conspiracy theories with outright rejection of the conclusions of science academies and institutions across the world that humans are causing climate changAs climate science denial goes, Roberts» position is as far to the fringe as you can go, mixing conspiracy theories with outright rejection of the conclusions of science academies and institutions across the world that humans are causing climate changas far to the fringe as you can go, mixing conspiracy theories with outright rejection of the conclusions of science academies and institutions across the world that humans are causing climate changas you can go, mixing conspiracy theories with outright rejection of the conclusions of science academies and institutions across the world that humans are causing climate change.

Anti nukes must laugh as they see pro nukes attack scientists, the National Academies, and anyone who would rather support the conclusions of independent expert panels repeatedly set up over several decades by the NAS rather than the ideas of individual scientists.