As illustrated in the Farbeh case,
conclusions of professional misconduct must be supported by findings in reasons that support such conclusions: Farbeh v. College of Pharmacists of British Columbia, 2011 BCSC 1676.
Not exact matches
Condon's own investigation said the findings
of misconduct against Fisher were based on faulty evidence and «inaccurate
conclusions» that «did not meet
professional standards.»
[2] The Law Society Act provides that the Law Society has certain investigative powers where the
conclusion is reached that there is sufficient information indicative
of professional misconduct or lack
of capacity.