She and others challenge the team's
conclusions point by point.
Not exact matches
Since then, additional sources and reports continue to
point to the same
conclusion: that hundreds, not dozens, of people died from the storm, despite claims
by President Trump and Puerto Rican officials that the count is 62 or fewer.
While the subjective and policy - laden nature of this particular exercise
points to a highly deferential approach
by the judiciary, it seems clear that the JRP must have some basis for its various
conclusions.
In
conclusion our main
point is that we think it is important that one understands how the «Eurozone debt crisis premium» impacts the gold market and the ramifications that price movements caused
by the changes in this premium have on how one analyses and trades gold.
But this does not mean that Suniva necessarily has a detailed or effective plan to resume manufacturing after the
conclusion of the Section 201 process, a
point which has been raised repeatedly
by Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).
The question is ridiculous, since yes, the religious leaders (Jews) had a hand in killing Jesus, but the
conclusion that modern Jews are responsible is also ridiculous, as well as the insistence on retracting the question
by the ADL, whose whole
point is to prevent people from blaming modern Jews, not whether the answer is true or not.
In
conclusion it is appropriate to
point out that God was always in control of the entire situation, which is why such evil that radiated from Satan was always limited
by God's control (Job 1:12; 2:6), and the end saw Satan condemned (Job 42:7 - 8), whilst upright Job was blessed (Job 42:12 - 17)
Since you mentioned it, I'm glad to
point that the Big Bang is just a way to dodge the facts and logic
conclusions made
by Edwin Hubble in his Observational Approach to Cosmology,
pointing that Earth was in a privileged position, in the center of universe, which obviously has to be done for a purpose,
by whoever is responsible for the Creation.
This
conclusion also leads to a more general
point about the nature of culture that is consistent with the previously mentioned criticism leveled
by Zaret against the idea of abstract values legitimating practical ethics.
The direction
pointed by David Gelernter, however, ends up in
conclusions that contributed to discrediting such thinking in the past.
To help
point the way out of the problem I will turn to the writings of Whitehead (particularly his later works), drawing from his work certain
conclusions which, while not explicitly stated
by him may nevertheless be said to follow from his overall philosophical scheme.
A large number of leading New Testament scholars have now rejected these traditions as unhistorical, leaving us with two
conclusions: the first, that none of the Gospels was written
by an eye - witness of the events described in it, and the second, that the earliest Gospel, that of Mark, was written thirty - five years or more after the death of Jesus, and the other three Gospels were written nearly sixty years or more after the same
point.
From the merely biological
point of view, so to call it, this is a
conclusion to which, so far as I can now see, we shall inevitably be led, and led moreover
by following the purely empirical method of demonstration which I sketched to you in the first lecture.
Systematic problems and developing solutions as raised
by Whitehead are discussed, but with some
points which lead to
conclusions definitely not accepted
by Whitehead.
And we must not forget that a quantum - mechanical calculation even on one particular bacterial cell would be incorrect for every other cell, even of the same species — a
point clearly made
by Elsasser in his
conclusions about the heterogeneity of the material with which the biologist has to deal.
Whatever
conclusion one reaches on this
point, no one could be more affected than the preacher
by the changes in the structure of the human psyche and the shifts in the areas of sensitivity within modern man's sensorium.
Nonetheless, from the starting
point of these principles (received
by faith) further
conclusions can be drawn, and this is done
by philosophical reasoning.
As Don Reiher
pointed out in the first comment of the previous post, it it tempting to go through Stegall's article paragraph
by paragraph and
point out all the misquotes, false definitions, false
conclusions, and logical fallacies.
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking
point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated
by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone
conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced
by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
Point being is although we might not have spent as much as our rivals in previous seasons we've still had opportunities to be in with a shout otherwise we wouldn't have consistently finished 3rd / 4th and as the seasons go
by and money is being spent the
conclusion is drawing towards wenger not being able to motivate our players throughout a season or concocting strategies to counter teams with gameplans designed to nullify us, or even bring in adequate replacements when necessary (kallstrom).
However, the real
point in Barcelona's case, is the title is
by no means a foregone
conclusion although it is likely.
While we know from first hand experience that no game is a foregone
conclusion pre-match, were Chelsea to drop
points in this home fixture with newly promoted Blackpool, it would rate amongst some of the biggest shocks in Premier League history, although, in actual fact, most punters are worrying over how many Chelsea will win
by rather than deciding whether or not Blackpool can spring another surprise at tasty odds.
Quiz Ref IDOur
conclusions are limited
by our study population, which was selected from a single cohort from the United States and sampled at a single time
point; thus, our findings may not be entirely generalizable to populations elsewhere or to different
points in infant development.
Danielle, you ARE trying to obfuscate things
by torturing the data and attempting to
point to
conclusions that have no basis in truth.
This general
conclusion is bolstered
by case law specifically on
point decided after Heller in the conservative 5th Circuit.
The scientists, whose
conclusions were published online December 24, 2008,
by Advances in Space Research, also
point out that chemical processes could even make the silk digestible.
Thus, he
points out, the tensor network approach supports the
conclusion suggested in previous work
by Raamsdonk and others: «Gravitational spacetime emerges from quantum entanglement.»
The best available evidence, gathered
by the world's leading experts,
points us now to a single
conclusion: we must act to halt and reverse the unsustainable use of nature — or risk not only the future we want, but even the lives we currently lead.
«From the practical
point of view, there seem to be some countermeasures, such as driving with windows open, solar screens on the side windows, etc., that can be applied
by drivers to deceive the system,» the authors wrote in their
conclusion.
A new paper published in Frontiers in Earth Science
by archeologist Dr. David Wright, from Seoul National University, challenges the
conclusions of most studies done to date that
point to changes in the Earth's orbit or natural changes in vegetation as the major driving forces.
Bero
points to a large body of research
by herself and others that shows industry - funded studies preferentially reach
conclusions that favor sponsors» products or interests.
I think it makes the
point validly that climate sensitivity (response to doubling CO2) above 5 deg.C is at least possible, albeit quite unlikely; a
conclusion borne out
by many other arguments and simulations.
Spencer does this
by both mis - characterizing the recent National Academies Report on the subject which indeed
pointed out that there are numerous lines of evidence for precisely this
conclusion, and
by completely ignoring the recently - released IPCC Fourth Assessment report, which draws the stronger
conclusion that the warmth of recent decades is likely anomalous in at least the past 1300 years.
Wigley et al. (1997)
pointed out that uncertainties in forcing and response made it impossible to use observed global temperature changes to constrain ECS more tightly than the range explored
by climate models at the time (1.5 °C to 4.5 °C), and particularly the upper end of the range, a
conclusion confirmed
by subsequent studies.
At the
conclusion of the presentations, the chairs will summarize the key
points presented, and allow further time for more general questions and answers, followed
by a final summing up.
When I wrote my review in spring of 2005 I
pointed out that Campbell was jumping the gun
by making
conclusions about other animal proteins and even all «nutrients from animal foods» when he only studied powdered casein, but I went no further than that.
To me it seems pretty clear that while things may change with further research, at this
point in time, the truth claims made
by people promoting these products are more of a marketing artifact than a scientific
conclusion.
Points to make: soy protein isolate and other highly processed modern soy protein products are not safe and have no long history of use in the food supply; studies published since 1999 undermine the credibility of — and
conclusions drawn — from key studies evaluated
by the FDA when it approved the health claim in 1999; recent studies show that soy can contribute to or cause heart disease, including endothelial damage (especially in women), heart arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy, an increasingly prevalent condition that affects 1 in 500 Americans.
I don't think this negates Dr. Greger's
points /
conclusions in this video but I have noticed that he asserts that «the benefits of caloric restriction on health and aging has been clearly demonstrated» (i'm assuming he means in humans) in several videos and blog posts including today's (15June 2015) post «Living Longer
by Reducing Leucine Intake».
This
conclusion is essentially the same as the
conclusion reached
by the Weston A. Price Foundation and the research of Chris Masterjohn; we have continually
pointed out that vitamins A and D work together and that without vitamin D, vitamin A can be ineffective or even toxic.
By the
conclusion of Garland's adaptation, it's clear he understands and respects VanderMeer's
point to the extreme, even if the expectations of a mid - to major - budget sci - fi film these days demand traditional closure.
In
conclusion, there are melodramatic spells, as well as some focal unevenness, spawned from hurrying past certain plot aspects that really aren't all that needed in the first place, being not much more than supplements to the rather repetitious bloating that makes this overambitious effort too overblown for its own good, though not to the
point of completely dismissing its engagement value, as there is enough sharpness to the production designs, cinematography and score work to provide striking style, as well as enough story value, brought to life
by inspired writing, direction and acting, - particularly
by leading lady Halle Berry - to make «Alex Haley's Queen» a rewarding near - epic study on the struggles faced
by the mulattoes who struggled to fit into a post-slavery society that was rich with racial tension and plenty of other life challenges.
At some
point, From Software must have been aware that their game was literally unplayable, but
by then it was too late and they had to grit their teeth and carry it through to its infuriating, fumbling
conclusion.
Perhaps MGSV's best quality is how in pulling gameplay to the foreground and letting much of the exposition remain optional, it opens it up to be enjoyed
by people who have in the past been put off
by its weirdness, serving as both the perfect entry
point and a satisfying
conclusion.
But there's not enough under the surface, and
by the time the film comes to a
conclusion, what the
point of the whole thing is seems lost.
Played extremely straight
by Hutton and with a satisfyingly reserved level of camp
by Boyle and Oliver Platt (as a corporate dirtbag), The Temp walks the tightrope of
pointed satire for a delirious stretch before being swallowed whole
by the great beast known as Faye Dunaway (chewing scenery) and the twisty genre formulas of its
conclusion.
by Barrett Hodsdon, follows the question mark at the end of its title all the way to a pessimistic
conclusion, making it one of the most extensive and
pointed critiques of any national cinema ever published.
«And we are focusing on bringing,
by that
point, an unprecedented, 22 - movie, continuous shared fictional narrative to a
conclusion in a satisfying way.
Fights and arguments among secondary characters were clearly included to both resolve character arcs and build the severity of the climax, but all they end up doing is ruining the pace and prolonging what has become a foregone
conclusion by this
point.
The climax may seem perfunctory
by the time it arrives, and the narrative labors in the direction of its
conclusion rather than developing organically toward its ultimate
point, but that
point is still well worth making.