Not exact matches
According to Whitehead (PR 28f) the analysis
of an actual entity into prehensions exhibits the most
concrete elements in its
nature, and such an analysis is called a division.
Thus Cyril C. Richardson has criticized the classical formulations
of the Trinity as imposing an arbitrary «threeness» upon our theological thinking, and proposes instead a basic twofold distinction between God as Absolute and God as Related.1 This is for Richardson a basic paradox, an apparent self - contradiction, for if we try to bring these aspects into relationship, we compromise God's absoluteness.2 Charles Hartshorne accepts this same twofold distinction, but he removes the contradictory
element by understanding it in terms
of the abstract and
concrete dimensions
of God's
nature and experience.3
In Whiteheadian terms a prehension does not have the full concreteness
of an actual entity, but «the analysis
of an actual entity into prehensions is that mode
of analysis which exhibits the most
concrete elements in the
nature of actual entities» (PR 28).
This exhibition picks up where Transitions left off by exploring «the continuous use
of concrete by blending together both
elements of nature and synthetic materials into abstract patterns and bold structures.»
Recurring themes include a return to
nature, the relationship between light and space, aspirations
of climbing the building, and the interplay
of diaphanous
elements with the
concrete structure.
Fu - Tung's passion for innovative design and sustainable materials culminated in a reinvention
of the traditional kitchen by using
concrete as a sculptural
element and incorporating the aesthetics
of Nature.