On at least one occasion,
the concurrent jurisdiction of a tribunal and the courts was sufficient to rebut the presumption of reasonableness (Rogers Communications Inc. v Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35 (CanLII)-RRB-, but the Supreme Court has resisted making such statutory schemes their own correctness category.
Not exact matches
The issue in this appeal is how that discretion ought to be exercised when another
tribunal with
concurrent human rights
jurisdiction has disposed
of the complaint.
Justice Rothstein noted that while the courts «don't always practise what they preach», one
of the differences between the relationship between the Copyright Board and the courts as opposed to other
tribunals is that the federal and provincial courts have
concurrent jurisdiction with the Copyright Board in interpreting rights.