Sentences with phrase «condition at baseline»

In particular, the study found that coaching was effective for vulnerable people who typically had worse control of their chronic condition at baseline.

Cardiovascular Disease A small subset of women (n = 400; average follow - up, 57.4 months) in WHI reported conditions at baseline that would have made them eligible for HERS, ie, prior MI or revascularization procedures.

Although we can not preclude reverse causality, when we excluded those who had conditions at baseline that are commonly influenced by lifestyle modifications (eg, CVD, cancer, or diabetes), we obtained similar findings.

There was a moderate effect of treatment on physical violence victimization in the expected direction at all four follow - up waves regardless of conditions at baseline, indicating both primary and secondary prevention effects.

The SFP 10 — 14 parents were higher in parenting skills than any of the conditions at baseline.

Not exact matches

The National Athletic Trainers» Association 2014 position statement on the management of sport - related concussion [14] says all athletes should «ideally» undergo a preseason baseline assessment, but, that, at a minimum, athletes who are at a high risk of concussion based on their sport should be included in any baseline testing program, with athletes with a significant concussion history, or other relevant pre-existing condition, such as attention - deficit hyperactivity disorder, tested on an individual basis.

After significant fury, the implied volatility settled out at a baseline level, and the carry trade returns because conditions are more placid.

At SAFARI we recommend a comprehensive physical examination for your bird to determine overall condition and to obtain a baseline body weight.

At this point, we have no valid concept of what those conditions were, or whether they have been altered by forces unknown, or what the new baseline is.

The Large Marine Ecosystem (LME) approach recommends a baseline of information at the LME management scale on changing states of productivity, fish and fisheries, pollution and ecosystem health, and socioeconomic and governance conditions.

self - reports of negative parenting behaviors on the Parenting Scale were lower than baseline at all follow - up assessments in both parent - training conditions (PTG and NR - PTG).

Differences between conditions at follow - up displayed precisely the same pattern of results noted here, with the following exceptions: (1) change in ECBI Intensity Scale score from baseline to the 6 - month follow - up was statistically significant between WL and PTG, but the ECBI Problem Scale score was not, and (2) change in the DPICS - CII child disruptive behavior at posttreament was significant in the NR - PTG condition.

Primary outcome: treatment response defined variably; number of patients with at least a 50 % reduction from baseline score on a condition relevant scale: the Hamilton Anxiety Scale for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), the Panic Disorder Severity Scale or the Sheehan Panic Anxiety Scale — Patient for panic disorder, the Brief Social Phobia Scale or the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for social phobia or a Clinical Global Impressions — Improvement (CGI - I) score of 1 or 2.

No differences were found between baseline and posttreatment in the WL condition, but both child disruptive behavior and negative parenting were lower at the 12 - month follow - up.

Tests of longitudinal change within conditions revealed that Quiz Ref IDself - reports of negative parenting behaviors on the Parenting Scale were lower than baseline at all follow - up assessments in both parent - training conditions (PTG and NR - PTG).

As seen in Table 2 and portrayed in Figure 2, the 3 CII components (ie, negative parenting, child disruptive behaviors, and negative parent - child interaction) were lower at posttreatment and the 12 - month follow - up compared with baseline in the PTG and NR - PTG conditions.

In addition, there were no differences among conditions on outcome variables at baseline.

The present results support previous studies.39) According to Hauschildt et al., 40) the PTSD group had lower HRV than did non-trauma-exposed controls at baseline and throughout different affective conditions, implying decreased parasympathetic activity and inflexible response regulation.

Symptoms of PTSD, comorbid conditions, and relationship satisfaction were collected by blinded assessors at baseline, at mid treatment (median, 8.00 weeks [range, 1.71 - 20.43 weeks] after baseline), and at posttreatment (median, 15.86 weeks [range, 7.14 - 38.57 weeks] after baseline).

After all youths within a wave completed baseline measures, parents and youths received ImPACT if randomized to FOK plus ImPACT or an attention control condition regarding employment readiness and education if randomized to FOK only.17 Follow - up assessments were conducted at 6 and 12 months after intervention.

Baseline measures will be collected prior to randomisation and parents will be asked not to reveal their condition allocation to the research team at follow - up.

There were no significant differences between conditions a baseline and at three months.

The three treatment conditions were comparable on all child and parent demographic and outcome variables collected at baseline.

Limitations include reliability of self - report measures and participants were not blind to condition and parents who selected to take part in the intervention reported greater youth SC at baseline.

Maltreated infants randomized to the community standard condition continued to evidence extremely high rates of insecure attachment consistent with that present at baseline.9 Interestingly, in the latter preventive intervention, a didactic and more behaviourally focused intervention was just as effective as one dealing with maternal representations in promoting secure attachment.

Observers masked to treatment condition coded an index of emotion regulation (i.e., global regulation) during a videotaped 10 - min parent — child interaction at the initial baseline assessment.

Participants are assessed at baseline, randomized to condition, and reassessed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postbaseline.