Sentences with phrase «conditions of the court orders»

This standard form is used by the court to define the terms and conditions of the court orders regarding child support or spousal maintenance.

Not exact matches

When an offender has satisfied all the terms and conditions of a judge's order — including incarceration, parole and probation, payment of court costs and restitution — they have earned their way back into the community.

Without limiting the foregoing, under no circumstances shall the Company be held liable for any delay or failure in performance resulting directly or indirectly from acts of nature, forces, or causes beyond its reasonable control, including, without limitation, Internet failures, computer equipment failures, telecommunication equipment failures, other equipment failures, electrical power failures, strikes, labour disputes, riots, insurrections, civil disturbances, shortages of labour or materials, fires, floods, storms, explosions, acts of God, war, governmental actions, orders of domestic or foreign courts or tribunals, non-performance of 3rd - parties, or loss of or fluctuations in heat, light, or air conditioning.

Without offering any specifics, the order signed by the judge Thursday evening said that prosecutors notified the court that «revocation of the defendant's bail conditions is appropriate at this time.»

Although, Turaki was granted a fresh bail conditions but Justice Nnamdi Dimgba of the Federal High Court ordered the defendant to remain in Kuje Prisons, Abuja, pending when the bail conditions were met.

An order for the release of the three former South African police officers to the registrar of the Accra Circuit Court until all their bail conditions are met has been defied by the Bureau of National Investigations (BNI).

Although Justice Nnamdi Dimgba of the Federal High Court granted bail to the ex-governor on fresh bail conditions on Tuesday, he ordered the defendant to remain in Kuje Prisons, Abuja, pending when the bail conditions were met.

The election tribunals and Court of Appeal ordered the re-runs, after voiding the returns for most of the Rivers legislative seats, federal and state; before the Supreme Court, in a bizarre verdict, endorsed the governorship poll, held the same day, and under the same bloody conditions, as the state legislative elections.

Some of the grounds the Federal Government is seeking the revocation of Kanu's bail are that; the offence for which he is standing trial is not ordinarily bailable; that among other conditions for the bail of the 1st defendant is that he should not be seen in a crowd exceeding 10 people; that he should not grant any interviews, hold or attend any rallies; that he should file in court medical updates of his health status every month; that rather than observing all of the conditions listed above, the 1st defendant in flagrant disobedience to the court order flouted all conditions of the bail.

This means that it would not be unlawful for a doctor to end a patient's life, on condition that an order is sought from the courts, that a judge is satisfied that the patient's medical condition involves «unbearable suffering», that the patient has given a «a voluntary, clear, settled and informed wish to end his own life», and that there are no other means of relieving the patient's suffering.

Many people have reacted to the Federal Government's application to the court to revoke the bail conditions of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, and order his re-arrest.

Counsel to Dasuki Mr Ahmed Raji (SAN) confirmed to PRNigeria that the former NSA had met all the bail conditions given by Justice Affem but regretted that the court order was not obeyed by the operatives of the SSS.

The order came after the court's attention was drawn by the prosecution to the fact that, the two failed to meet aspects of the bail condition requiring them to deposit their passports before...

The judge said that since the prosecution counsel Mr. Oladipo Okpeseyi (SAN) did not object to the bail of the ex-NSA, the court has to affirm same and ordered the defendant to continue to enjoy the bail condition granted him in 2015 when he was first arraigned.

The Judge also ordered that the traveling passport the defendant submitted to the Deputy Director Litigation of the Court as part of the bail conditions should be forthwith released to him.

The National Eczema Association reserves the right at all times to disclose any information as necessary to satisfy any law, regulation, government request, court order, subpoena or other legal process, or to edit or remove any information, in whole or in part, that in the National Eczema Association's sole discretion is objectionable, disruptive to the Site or in violation of these Terms and Conditions.

The study, «Resegregation and Equity in Oklahoma City,» authored by Jennifer Jellison of the Harvard Project on School Desegregation, examined the assumptions underlying the Supreme Court's 1991 Oklahoma City - based Dowell decision, a landmark decision that for the first time sanctioned a return to segregated schooling by stating that districts may be released from a desegregation order if they had met certain conditions.

But the Republican governor, who is prohibited by law from running for a third term, also asked the legislature to concentrate on issues other than just school facilities — a topic that has dominated the legislature since a 2002 Arkansas Supreme Court decision ordered the state to improve student achievement and the conditions of schools.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

(1) Where it is necessary for completing transfers, or (2) In order to verify the existence and condition of your account for a third party, such as a credit bureau or merchant, or (3) In order to comply with government agency or court orders, or (4) If you give us your written permission.

Term Life Insurance By Jeff reserves the right to fully cooperate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing Term Life Insurance By Jeff to disclose the identity of anyone posting any e-mail messages, or publishing or otherwise making available any materials that are believed to violate these Terms and Conditions of Use.

That's why inspectors are armed with copies of a court order giving them the power to impound endangered or mistreated animals if poor conditions are not corrected.

We may disclose your personal information with or without your knowledge or consent when we are permitted or required to do so by applicable law, government request or court order, or based on our good faith belief that it is necessary to do so in order to comply with such law, request or court order; to enforce or apply applicable terms and conditions and other agreements; or to protect the rights, property or safety of our organization, our supporters, other users, pets in the care of organizations that we work with, the public or others.

In these circumstances the Court decided to refer the following questions for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU: 1) whether for the purposes of Art. 2 (2)(c), Member States can require the direct descendant who is older than 21 years to have tried, without success, to obtain employment in the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be met.

The Court indeed starts by recalling its case - law according to which «in order to assess whether the same measure would have been adopted in normal market conditions by a private investor in a situation as close as possible to that of the State, only the benefits and obligations linked to the situation of the State as shareholder — to the exclusion of those linked to its situation as a public authority — are to be taken into account.»

«We are pleased the court ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restore DACA under the same conditions set forth by a federal court in California,» said New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the plaintiffs, in a statement.

The sentence was delivered pursuant to Section 75 of Nova Scotia's Occupational Health and Safety Act, which allows the court to order any number of creative conditions which serve the purpose of «securing the offender's good conduct and... preventing the offender from repeating the same offence».

On the 24th January 2017, the United Kingdom Supreme Court returned the Miller judgment on appeal confirming the High Court's decision of 3rd November 2016 that a further Act of Parliament was required in order to fulfil the necessary condition for withdrawal mandated by the European Union Treaties» withdrawal clause.

This post will consider the proposal with a particular focus on whether the joint court could violate the Court of Justice's stringent conditions for protecting the autonomy of the EU legal ocourt could violate the Court of Justice's stringent conditions for protecting the autonomy of the EU legal oCourt of Justice's stringent conditions for protecting the autonomy of the EU legal order.

Temporary order issued by the court giving legal custody of a child to a parent, guardian, relative, or person with a significant relationship with the child subject to such conditions and limitations as the court may deem necessary to provide for the safety and welfare of the child.

The court observed that section 17 of the Divorce Act allows a court to vary any spousal support order, provided it is satisfied there has been a «material change» in the «condition, means, needs, or other circumstances of either former spouse» since the original order (or last variation) was made.

Having appeared before the Ontario Court of Justice, Superior Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Scott Pearl has gained great experience representing his clients that have been charge with various criminal offences ranging from sexual and domestic assault, possession and trafficking of drugs, robbery, breaking and entering, mischief, fraud, and breaching bail conditions and probation orders.

The appellant's repeated failure to comply, coupled with the other instances of non co-operation, by failure to comply with bail conditions and community sentences, are clearly, as the judge found, part of a deliberate policy of disobedience to court orders.

The Court recalled that a legislative act must fulfil two conditions in order for it to be adopted on the basis of article 114 TFEU.

However, the Court of Appeal ordered NNPC to provide an additional security of US$ 100 million (having previously provided security of US$ 80million) as a condition of being entitled to advance a defence that enforcement should be refused because the award had been procured by IPCO's fraud.

In particular, this judgment from the jurisdiction's apex court has clarified definitively the limits of an enforcing Court's power to order security as a condition on the right to have a decision of a properly arguable challenge under the New York Convention 1958 and the English Arbitration Act court has clarified definitively the limits of an enforcing Court's power to order security as a condition on the right to have a decision of a properly arguable challenge under the New York Convention 1958 and the English Arbitration Act Court's power to order security as a condition on the right to have a decision of a properly arguable challenge under the New York Convention 1958 and the English Arbitration Act 1996.

Furthermore, the German court inquired whether there are any other conditions that must be fulfilled in order to consider a service to be «provided» within the meaning of Article 12 (1) E-Commerce Directive, other than that access to a network has been made available.

Section 281 (5) provides as follows: «Discharge does not, except to such extent and on such conditions as the court may direct, release the bankrupt from any bankruptcy debt which --(a) consists in a liability to pay damages [of specific types]... in respect of personal injuries to any person; or (b) arises under any order made in family proceedings or under a maintenance calculation made under the Child Support Act 1991.»

Judicial interim release (bail) is an order of release permitting a person to be out of custody, on various conditions, while they await resolution on their matters that are before the Court

The Court of Appeal found that in order to impose interim conditions on a massage therapist who is subject to a complaint, the Inquiries Committee has to conclude that there was a prima facie case to support the allegation and an interim order is required to protect the public.

Elisabet's post guides us through the meaning of the CILFIT judgment and the apparent relaxation of its conditions in order to maintain the good working relationship between the Court and national courts.

Once the accused is faced with the crushing reality of a year or more battling charges (all the while separated from his family) our system will dangle a carrot offering to vary bail conditions to permit family reunification if the accused will enrol in a course of court - ordered counselling and enter a guilty plea to the charges.

The alternative argument suggested by IPCO was that Rule 3.1 (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules gave the courts general powers to order conditions, and such powers were unaffected by the Arbitration Act 1996 and the New York Convention.

The situation fell within section 103 (3) rather than section 103 (5), and the order of security as a condition was outside the court's remit because there was no power to order security under section 103 (3).

The appellate court also stated that the condition for producing these patient records was that they be subject to a protective order that (1) prohibited the parties from disclosing the records outside the confines of the litigation, and (2) required that the records be returned to the covered entity or destroyed at the end of litigation.

Often a court or police officer will order persons to comply with certain conditions, most commonly through a recognizance of bail or through an undertaking.

HB 1506 Requires that the guidelines for conditions of all deferred or installment payment agreements for the payment of court - ordered fines or other penalties be reduced to writing as well as posted in the clerk's office and on the court's website, if a website is available.

This decision reflects the provisions of the Divorce Act, which states (s. 15.2 (4)-RRB- that the court in considering a spousal support award shall take into consideration the condition, means, needs and other circumstances of each spouse, including the length of time the spouses cohabited; the functions performed by each spouse in the relationship; and any order, agreement or arrangement relating to support of either spouse.

The Court of Appeal was also satisfied that the threshold conditions for making such a blocking order were satisfied in these circumstances.

In particular, in scrutinizing the exercise of this choice, the Court's review must focus «as to whether the EU legislator could reasonably have taken the view, first, that in order to be implemented, the legal framework which it laid down regarding the system of fees referred to in Article 80 (1) of Regulation 528/2012 needs only the addition of further details without its non-essential elements having to be amended or supplemented and, secondly, that the provisions of the Regulation -LRB-...) relating to that system, require uniform conditions for implementation».