Sentences with phrase «conduct global warming research»

Not exact matches

In a video posted on his official Assembly website, Hanna is seen debating a bill on the floor and decrying a «conspiracy» by scientists who engage in climate research to «suppress» research conducted by those who challenge the existence of global warming.

► In other climate change news, Leigh Dayton wrote on Tuesday that in April, «the University of Western Australia (UWA) in Perth announced plans to set up an Australian Consensus Centre (ACC), chaired by [global warming skeptic Bjørn] Lomborg, that would conduct policy research on overseas aid, Australian prosperity, agriculture, and regional issues.

A new national survey conducted by The Associated Press - NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and researchers at Yale University found that fewer than 1 in 3 Americans, and 40 percent of Catholics, are aware of Pope Francis's efforts to publicize global warming as a priority issue for the Catholic Church.

Despite the ads» claims, an analysis by the Center of American Progress determined that ACCCE's companies spend relatively few dollars conducting research on carbon capture and storage, the most promising clean coal technology to reduce global warming pollution from coal - fired power plants.

After a decade of frank internal discussions on global warming and conducting unbiased studies on it, Exxon changed direction in 1989 and spent more than 20 years discrediting the research its own scientists had once confirmed.

An essay on global warmingIf you are writing an essay on global warming, you should be ready to conduct an extensive research.

Numerous «real» scientists conducting «real» scientific research on global warming, whose results are published in «real» peer - reviewed journals, have been quoted in interviews as characterizing their own research as «alarming».

This, in turn, could fuel global warming even more, according to research conducted last summer in the Arctic.

I have NO IDEA where either of these students stands on the issue of attribution of global warming (note the complexities of attribution are nicely summarized in a current post over at RC); none of us conducts specific research in that area and that is not what we talk about.

At the moment, the large lender is helping poorer countries prepare for global warming by building seawalls, conducting crop research, and improving freshwater management.

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley About 18 months ago, as soon as I heard of Dr. Richard Müller's Berkeley Earth Temperature project, I sent an email to several skeptical scientists drawing their attention to his statement that he considered his team's attempt to verify how much «global warming» had occurred since 1750 to be one of the most important pieces of research ever to be conducted in the history of science.

The letter cites an ongoing investigative series by InsideClimate News, which has revealed that Exxon scientists conducted rigorous climate research from the late - 1970s to mid-1980s and warned top company executives about how global warming posed a threat to Exxon's core business.

US District Judge William Alsup has asked lawyers representing San Francisco and Oakland, Calif., and those representing five major oil companies, to conduct research on the science of global warming and present their findings in a federal hearing.

The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Oct. 13 - 18 among 2,251 adults reached on landlines and cell phones, finds that 32 % say global warming is a very serious problem while 31 % think it is somewhat serious.

The research creates context around the idea of global warming effects, adding crucial information to the previously conducted studies in the attempt to understand the water climate.

There are a few scientists who don't conduct research into the climate who disagree, but going to them to find out how global warming works is a bit like going to a chiropodist and asking her to look at your ears.

Stay tuned, my long - held educated guess that Ross Gelbspan did no «investigative journalism» research into his claims that Western Fuels was out to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» is now something I can say (via interview results conducted by a renowned politics researcher), with absolute certainty.

But, ironically, for more than seven years, research that environmentalists have privately conducted on attitudes toward global warming has found the opposite: Cautionary tales and narratives of eco-apocalypse tend to provoke fatalism, conservatism, and survivalism among voters - not the rational embrace of environmental policies.

The #ExxonKnew campaign has gained enormous traction in the public mind and many want to know why the corporation started out as such an honest broker in the 1970s, conducting its own climate science research, and then doing an about - face in the 1980s, blatantly denying the reality of global warming and working with other groups to manipulate public opinion so as to thwart a rational public response.

For example, he has argued that the literature search should have been conducted with Scopus rather than the Web of Science in order to capture more papers, but also that fewer papers should have been included in the survey in order to focus on those specifically researching the causes of global warming.