Two years ago legal AI systems
conducting doc review for M&A transactions were seen somewhere between a novelty and «robots»... (remember when people still used that term to talk about legal AI software...?)
Not exact matches
The image is then
reviewed with parents by a Clinician, who
conducts an overall head shape evaluation and determines whether or not the baby is a candidate for
DOC Band treatment.
Fortunately for many
doc review attorneys, software hasn't completely eliminated the need for human reviewers, and predictive coding raises at least two important issues for attorneys: (1) their legal obligations to
conduct a reasonable search for responsive documents under federal discovery rules, and (2) their ethical obligation to safeguard a client's privileged information.
You want to consider some other case - e.g., whether paralegals or other non-attorneys will be deemed to be engaged in the unauthorized practice of law when
conducting a document
review if Lola finds the
doc review at issue in that case was the practice of law.