Under the terms of that settlement, L.A. Unified agreed that its practice of
conducting teacher layoffs according to strict seniority created a hardship for students in the most disadvantaged schools so severe that it amounts to a deprivation of rights.
Just 17 percent said California should continue to
conduct teacher layoffs in order of seniority....
Not exact matches
Research Now
conducted a survey of 618 California
teachers, principals and superintendents to find out their opinions on
teacher effectiveness, tenure, dismissal and «last - in, first - out»
layoffs.
Tiffini was stunned to find out that this
teacher was laid off due to «last - in, first - out» (LIFO) dismissal policies, which prioritize seniority over
teacher quality when a school district
conducts budgetary
layoffs.
By state law, those
layoffs would have been
conducted on a last - hired, first - fired basis, meaning most
teachers hired after 2007 in New York City would lose their jobs, no matter how they performed in the classroom.
In a review of California's «last in, first out» process
conducted over four years ago, the state's own Legislative Analyst Office concluded that seniority - based
layoffs lead «to lower quality of the overall
teacher workforce» and recommended that «the state explore alternatives that could provide districts with the discretion to do what is in the best interest of their students.»
The announcement came as the New York State Senate geared up for a vote on a bill that would end the
teacher seniority system and allow the city to
conduct layoffs based on merit.