After a catastrophic week for Labour, and defections and scandals for the Tories, many in Glasgow believe that there is simply no way that Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems could have a worse
conference than the other parties.
Not exact matches
The Democrats» short - lived stint in power was chaotic and dysfunctional, and the death of the marriage vote caused advocates to change their tactics, focusing on ousting «no» voters regardless of their
party affiliation rather
than putting all their hopes in one
conference or the
other.
[14] However, referring to a
Conference speech by the
party's former leader, Campaign Manager Andrew Mitchell said: «William Hague made a great speech which many people will judge to be better
than all the
other leadership candidates put together.
If after a vote at
Conference i) the proposal from the Commons
Party is agreed but ii) the majority is less
than 2 / 3rds then, if after further consideration, the Commons
Party still wishes to support the arrangement with one or more
other parties then at their request the Federal Executive shall arrange a ballot of all
Party members pursuant to clause 6.11 or 8.6 of the Constitution, the consent of a majority of those voting shall be taken as giving support to the arrangement.
it is inexcusable (and irresponsible with the lives of millions of NYers) that Sampson, the
conference leader, should have anything on his schedule
other than resolving his
party's failure to pass an on - time budget (obviously, pressing personal / family matters are ok).
It was however obvious that many
party members had different ideas
other than the
conference for rebranding the
party.
Assuming that the Republican
conference is roughly 50 members and the Democrats» roughly 100, if Silver gets the 51 votes within his
conference and wins his
parties nod for Speaker, what are the odds that 26 Democrats who voted against Silver in
conference will join 50 republicans on the floor of the assembly and vote for someone
other than Silver for Speaker?
At any time after the filing of a joint case
conference report, or not sooner
than 10 days after a
party has filed a separate case
conference report, or upon order by the court or discovery commissioner, any
party who has complied with Rule 16.1 (a)(1) may obtain discovery by one or more of the following additional methods: depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or
other property under Rule 34 or Rule 45 (a)(1)(C), for inspection and
other purposes; physical and mental examinations; and requests for admission.
Proposed final orders, a financial declaration and, if parenting is at issue, a proposed parenting plan, as well as any
other materials requested by the neutral third person must be provided to the neutral third person and all
parties no later
than two (2) working days before the day scheduled for the
conference.