Sentences with phrase «confidence limit»

The report includes information such as property address, real - time value, valuation date, upper confidence limit, lower confidence limit, year built, frontage, depth, site area, property type and description, square footage range, total finished basement area, number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms and other detailed property information on the property.

So in what way does your off - again / on - again relationship with the 95 % confidence limit change the need to mitigate AGW?

The horizontal lines indicate the 95 % confidence limit.

Having noted that its been a while since anyone has tried to put up a «IPCC falsified» headline I assume that even under Lucia's preferred analysis method observations lies within the confidence limit.

But of course the confidence limit is arbitrary, and I hope I understand correctly that a 95 % confidence level simply means that the opposite result can only happen 5 % of the time by chance.

It appears to me that at times the difference between prediction an reality has been near the borderline of statistical significance — hence posts several years back from Lucia that the trend was «falsified» and counter posts here that a correct analysis auto - correlation etc puts observations back within the confidence limit.

The blue uncertainty bars (95 % confidence limit) account only for incomplete spatial sampling.

A quick answer to your query: A confidence interval is intended to indicate the reliability of an estimate, in terms of the probability that the true value of the parameter being estimated falling below the lower confidence limit, inside the confidence interval, or above its upper limit, as the case may be.

The bound is, given the statistical model, an exact confidence limit by construction.

Any confidence limit can be used.

The obtained correlation coefficient has a confidence limit of more than 99 %, and thus, these parameters can be effectively used in the prediction of the descent time of forthcoming SCs.

Its median climate sensitivity estimate of 1.6 C wsn't materially changed by the replot, but the upper tail was fattened, with the upper 97.5 % confidence limit being increased from 4.1 C to 8.6 C.

-- S09 show fast warming in West Antarctica, with a central estimate over twice its lower 95 % confidence limit (0.20 ± 0.09, using our geographical definitions).

Applying the equation: the lower confidence limit, which is 2 % less than the Calculated Rate, never falls to zero.

Applying the equation, the lower confidence limit, which is 4 % less than the Calculated Rate, equals zero when the earnings yield equals 5.0 % and P / E10 = 20.

The odds are (roughly) 95 % that the return will be lower than the higher confidence limit.

The lower confidence limit, which is 2 % less than the Calculated Rate, equal zero when the earnings yield is 5.4 % and P / E10 = 18.0.

The Safe Withdrawal Rate is the lower confidence limit.

The lower confidence limit is 0.9 % below the Calculated Rate with 1.0 % TIPS, 0.8 % below the Calculated Rate with 1.8 % TIPS and 0.7 % with 2.0 % TIPS.

The odds are about 20 % that the balance at year 10 will be higher than one - half way between this level and the level of the high confidence limit.

It is the other confidence limit about the calculated rate.)

The lower confidence limit is the Safe Withdrawal Rate.

The lower confidence limit equals 0 % when y = 4 %.

When the most likely return y is 4 %, the lower confidence limit is 0 %.

At the lower confidence limit (with a 5 % probability), the annualized return is — 0.8 %.

Today's Safe Withdrawal Rate, which is the lower confidence limit, is 4.4 %.

Today's High Risk Rate, which is on the upper confidence limit, is 5.9 %.

The lower confidence limit, which is the Safe Withdrawal Rate, is minus 0.7 %.

Today's Safe Withdrawal Rate, which is on the lower confidence limit, is 3.6 %.

If the balance approaches an upper confidence limit, we may be able to relax our restrictions on the withdrawal rate.

This is the equation for the Calculated Rate of portfolio HFWR50 The lower confidence limit is the Safe Withdrawal Rate.

The upper confidence limit is plus $ 100K.

The lower confidence limit is 0.7 % below this or 7.0 %.

This is the equation for the Calculated Rate of portfolio CTVR50 The lower confidence limit is the Safe Withdrawal Rate.

We call the upper confidence limit the High Risk Rate.

We find that the years with the lowest Historical Surviving Withdrawal Rates were closer to the regression line (which we call the Calculated Rates) than to the lower confidence limit, the Safe Withdrawal Rate.

Values above the upper confidence limit indicate a well with a potentially active compound.

If a reduction in type 2 diabetes risk of 15 % (based on the conservative confidence limit) is associated with breastfeeding in Westernized populations where the prevalence of diabetes is ≈ 6 % and the proportion infants who are bottle - fed is at least one - third, the proportion of diabetes in the population that could be attributed to breastfeeding would be 5 % (51).

Horizontal lines represent 95 % confidence intervals and arrows 95 % confidence intervals that were clipped when the confidence limits extended to extreme values (e.g., odds ratios of 0.03 or 9.5) in order to maintain the readability of the central portion of the graph.

Finally, for the statistically significant associations of breastfeeding with later cognition, 95 % CIs were narrow and exclude a null result, but the lower confidence limits include values with little clinical importance.

The absence of any appreciable association between breastfeeding and fasting glucose concentration in children and adults (with confidence limits around the pooled estimate excluding any appreciable association) is not necessarily surprising or inconsistent with the observations on diabetes risk.

Where cluster adjusted confidence limits were presented but not the ICC, the design effect was estimated from comparison with limits based on the raw numbers.

A coalescence model predicts an expected time to a most recent common ancestral male lineage of 270,000 years (95 percent confidence limits: 0 to 800,000 years).

These confidence limits assume that the overall risk for a given individual is provided by our estimates and should not be interpreted as measuring the overall uncertainty in the absolute risk estimates, as shown in Table 5.

In 2001 the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), which produced the A2 population projectiion put the 95 % confidence limits for the world's end - century population at 4.3 — 14.4 billion.

In your sixth last line, you've put the Annan and Hargreaves (A&H) estimate of the lower bound of the 95 % confidence limits for climate sensitivity at 1.9 ºC.

Vertical lines indicate 95 % confidence limits, the range within which 95 % of results fall.

From that, lower and upper confidence limits representing 3SD units above and below the mean are plotted.

The mean expression level and confidence limits of HMOX1 protein were estimated from the raw pixel intensities using JMP software (SAS Institute).

After log - transforming total IgE, linear regression was used to estimate geometric mean ratios for IgE; confidence limits were calculated using Huber variances.