Our inner
confidence limits range from -2.3 % (Unlucky) to +3.7 % (Lucky).
Our outer
confidence limits range from -5.3 % to +6.7 %.
The outer
confidence limits range from -6.4 % to 3.6 % (real).
Not exact matches
That's how we flush enough error out of the system so that we can have some
confidence that within some
limited range of social behavior that we're going to get some degree of accuracy.
Vertical lines indicate 95 %
confidence limits, the
range within which 95 % of results fall.
If a child has
limited opportunity to experience a wide
range of textures and shapes and qualities of materials then this has impacts such as losing the ability to walk with
confidence and other skills like holding tools or objects such as pencils and pens, which affects the ability to manipulate those materials in order to process symbols, such as the alphabet.
In addition, cooperative control between the AWD torque distribution, brake
limited slip differential and Hill Start Assist optimizes performance on hills starts and rough roads — adding to the sense of
confidence and driving pleasure under a
range of driving scenarios.
Its likely
range is from -2.2 % to +3.8 % (inner
confidence limits).
Its outer
range is from -5.2 % to +6.8 % (outer
confidence limits).
The Outcome Matrix does not include
confidence limits directly, but it does bound the
range of likely outcomes.
He includes
confidence limits, which
range from plus and minus 6 % to 7 % for US equities.
However, Judith has recently claimed a 1 - 10 deg C
range (90 %
confidence limits) for 2x C02 so, presumably, there must be reasonable grounds for thinking that the upper
limit prior must be higher than 7.5 degC?
If the aim is to establish
confidence limits over the entire
range of probability space, then I would agree that you need the pdf to be correct over the entire interval of calendar dates, something which it is not possible to obtain unambiguously whatever method is applied.
Consistent with the last IPCC assessment report, we find that most of the observed warming over this period (+0.65 K) is attributable to anthropogenic forcings (+0.67 ± ± 0.12 K, 90 %
confidence range), with a very
limited contribution from natural forcings (− 0.01 ± 0.02 − 0.01 ± 0.02 K).
Though there has been little sign of improvement in our certainty as to its precise value, there has been greatly increased
confidence in the
limits of that
range: pretty much everyone in the business accepts that the number (to the extent it is well - defined, which I question) is in that
range.
It is the evidence evaluated from the combined results that has led to the current estimate climate sensitivity
range of about 2 - 4.5 C per CO2 doubling, typically with 90 percent
confidence limits.
Consistent with the last IPCC assessment report, we find that most of the observed warming over this period (+0.65 K) is attributable to anthropogenic forcings (+0.67 \ (\ pm \) 0.12 K, 90 %
confidence range), with a very
limited contribution from natural forcings (\ -LRB--0.01 \ pm 0.02 \) K).
The
confidence limits were produced by spanning the
range of sensitivities diagnosed from the 11 C4MIP models (Tables 7.4 and 7.5).
The report includes information such as property address, real - time value, valuation date, upper
confidence limit, lower
confidence limit, year built, frontage, depth, site area, property type and description, square footage
range, total finished basement area, number of bedrooms, number of bathrooms and other detailed property information on the property.