After years and years of science
confirming anthropogenic global warming, that's official.
Not exact matches
«Here we present an analysis based on sea - level data from the altimetry record of the past ~ 20 years that separates interannual natural variability in sea level from the longer - term change probably related to
anthropogenic global warming... Our results
confirm the need for quantifying and further removing from the climate records the short - term natural climate variability if one wants to extract the
global warming signal.»
Assuming three of the four inches are due to
anthropogenic CO2, then the storm surge was 1.8 % higher due to
global warming (taking 14 feet as the storm surge maximum, a number on which there is little agreement,
confirming my hypothesis above that we are arguing in the noise).
Not only does it
confirm a root cause, but it yields an additional benefit of a confidence level: when 29 out of 30 experts vote that the «
global warming» is «catastrophic
anthropogenic», they have reached that conclusion on a 97 % confidence level.
Effectively, if we can not detect an
anthropogenic signal in deep ocean heat data,
anthropogenic global warming would necessarily be characterized as a belief, not a scientifically
confirmed hypothesis.
The (formerly respected) scientific journal Nature chimed in and announced in an (Oct. 26) editorial [i] that any results
confirming «climate change» (meaning
anthropogenic global warming — AGW) are welcome, even when released before peer review.