Sentences with phrase «conflict court hearings»

Not exact matches

Thus, in a lawsuit where a constitutional rule conflicts with a statute or executive policy the court hearing the case must follow the Constitution and ignore the conflicting act.

Now, this cultural conflict is coming to a head in the U.S. Supreme Court, which will hear oral arguments April 26 in a...

The Canadian Bar Association will urge the Supreme Court of Canada to water down its bright line rule on conflicts during Thursday's hearing of Canadian National Railway v. McKercher LLP.

A Court hearing requires proceedings to be drafted, issued, responded to, documents to be disclosed, Expert Opinions sought, Review Hearings, Direction Hearings and obtaining a date for a Final Hearing can take many months or longer in high conflict or complexhearing requires proceedings to be drafted, issued, responded to, documents to be disclosed, Expert Opinions sought, Review Hearings, Direction Hearings and obtaining a date for a Final Hearing can take many months or longer in high conflict or complexHearing can take many months or longer in high conflict or complex cases.

Chicago criminal defense attorney Michael O'Meara understands that every case has multiple points of view that may conflict, and knows how to get your side of the story heard in court.

The court will hear three appeals, two of which challenge British Columbia's drunk - driving laws and the power of police officers to impose penalties at roadside stops, and another involving the paramountcy of the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act over conflicting provincial statutes.

and family law conflicts without hearings, trial or other intervention of the courts.

Unified Family Court increases efficiency and is better for families by eliminating duplicate hearings, decreasing the potential for conflicting orders, creating opportunity for alternative dispute resolution and promoting more informed judicial decision making.

Actions or Motions subject of the conflict of jurisdiction shall not proceed further until the Judicial Body issued a decision determining the court having jurisdiction to hear the same.

The first branch upon which leave may be granted requires the moving party to establish that there is a conflicting decision of another judge or court in Ontario or elsewhere, and that it is in the opinion of the judge hearing the motion «desirable that leave to appeal be granted».

In summary, the JT ruled that at the point of determining Assas» application there was no conflict between the two courts but a conflict of jurisdiction would arise if, at a later time, both courts endeavored to hear the case.

(c) If an opinion which conflicts with a prior opinion of this Court has been issued fewer than thirty (30) days before the issuing panel makes a recommendation for an en banc hearing, the issuing panel shall vacate and withdraw the conflicting opinion, pending the full Court's determination on whether to consider the case en banc.

(b) Absent exceptional circumstances, all members of this Court shall participate in the en banc hearing unless disqualified for conflicts.

Leave may be granted under (a) where there is a conflicting decision by another judge or court in Ontario or elsewhere on the matter involved in the proposed appeal and it is, in the opinion of the judge hearing the motion, desirable that leave to appeal be granted.

The Judicial Tribunal is reported to have decided that the Dubai Courts had jurisdiction to hear the case, on the basis that they have «general jurisdiction» in the event of a conflict of jurisdiction, and the DIFC Courts should cease to entertain the case.

However, where there is a conflict in either the factual or expert evidence, the court hearing the certification motion does not resolve that conflict; that is a task for the judge presiding over the trial.

She held that allowing defence counsel to attend at a first stage hearing under a confidentiality undertaking would breach this rule and would place defence counsel in a a conflict of interest (torn between her duty to the court and client).

The principal problem with divorce is created by the fact that the court that hears the petition applies only its own law; in conflicts terms, there is no choice of law component.

Which is why defendant considers Rome II: if the English courts were to hear the case, they would have to apply Rome II even if their jurisdiction is a result of residual English conflicts rules).

Together they provide an unparalleled combination of extensive experience providing conflicts of interest legal opinions, representing government clients in Commission investigations, representing clients in public hearings before the Commission and litigating ethics issues in both trial and appellate courts.

Courts, tribunals and arbitrators have increasingly heard cases where an employee's needs relating to his or her family status have come into conflict with workplace requirements.

An important case on the scope of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest, Canadian National Railway v. McKercher LLP and Gordon Wallace (on appeal from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal), was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada on January 24.

The court never hears from both parties at the same time, and will never know at the time of hearing whether conflicting evidence will be adduced by the other side until after the provisional order is made.

• Assess family's financial, medical and parenting needs • Develop and implement family goals of services to support objectives • Conduct 2 - 4 home visits on a daily basis • Organize workshops for parents to teach them regarding parenting and social interaction • Help parents and children in creating and maintaining a positive home environment • Work hard to develop trust between family and district to support child's educational • Create and maintain record of cases • Resolve conflicts between parents, teachers and students to increase the ratio of student's success • Ensure the privacy and confidentiality • Document case reports and file the cases for court hearings, furnishing the attorneys with all necessary documents • Provide counseling services to families in need of assistance • Perform regularly scheduled home visits and on - site inspection to probe certain suspected child abuse or family violence cases

The annual convention of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) is also being held in Washington, D.C. that week, offering us an additional opportunity for the voice of targeted - chosen parents to be heard by the primary legal - psychological professional organization involved in child custody and high - conflict divorce.

This is a much more difficult task than you can imagine, having heard more than my share of horror stories regarding unnecessarily lengthy court proceedings, unmanaged couple conflicts, and attorneys who seem to have only their best interests at heart.

They observed the devastating impact of divorce proceedings where children were traumatized by finding themselves in the midst of terrible and protracted conflict between their parents and in which life savings were drained by the need to fuel perpetual court hearings.

Even if parties are unable to agree or completely negotiate their high conflict divorce, courts will try to get the parties to agree on as many issues as possible to narrow the contested issues that would have to be heard in a trial or hearing.

NAR and its fellow trades advocated for the case to be heard by the United States Supreme Court in order to address conflicts in the interpretation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by various courts across the U.S.