Sentences with phrase «conflict over a decision»

Not exact matches

A conflicted decision over what to read at the airport led Chef Eric Ripert into his lifelong journey into Buddhism.
General Mills got into some public relations hot water recently over their decision to deny disgruntled consumers the right to litigate and instead force conflicts into arbitration.
Disney might have to divest a cable channel or two (the company's power over distributors would be even stronger; basically the opposite of the some of the concerns that halted the Comcast acquisition of Time Warner), and potentially be limited in its ability to make operational decisions about Hulu (Disney would have a controlling stake after the merger; Comcast was similarly restricted after acquiring NBC Universal, but there the concern was more about Comcast's conflict of interest with regards to its cable TV business competing with Hulu).
Ministry cites the economy as main factor in the decision; critic cites conflict over leader C. J. Mahaney.
Over the weekend, many newspapers ran an Associated Press story by religion correspondent Rachel Zoll, about the emerging conflicts between same - sex marriage and religious freedom — such as are exemplified in the unfortunate decision last week by the New Mexico supreme court in Elane Photography v. Willock.
Over the weekend, many newspapers ran an Associated Press story by religion correspondent Rachel Zoll, about the emerging conflicts between same - sex marriage and religious freedom — such as are exemplified in the unfortunate decision last week by the New Mexico supreme court in Elane....
There's conflicting advice in books and from professionals, and on top of that, your hormones are all over the place making every decision emotional.
People can reasonably consider it to be an unacceptable conflict of interest that investors who profit directly from Nestlé systematically violating the Code and Resolutions have influence over the FTSE4Good criteria and decisions on company inclusion.
Now you have a decision to make - use nuclear weapons, likely escalating the conflict to a full - out nuclear war, i.e. Game Over, Earth - or allow them to take one village.
The former prime minister expressed «sorrow and regret» over the mistakes made during the build up and aftermath of the conflict, but insisted he would make the same decision again.
The decision to hold a referendum at all was an attempt to limit the endemic conflict within the party over Europe.
The ugly conflict last winter on the 3 - 2 Republican town board over filling a board vacancy may have been a factor in Chipman's decision.
However, Starmer's decision to hail the early vote as a victory could mean shadow cabinet ministers who are conflicted over Brexit, such as Clive Lewis and Diane Abbott, may feel more comfortable with voting in favour of the bill on Wednesday, as they will be able to argue that the party helped shape the process.
The movie covers the brewing conflict as decisions are made to create a new Muslim homeland, Pakistan, as political leaders including Nehru, Jinnah and Gandhi come together in the house to wrangle over the birth of independent India.
A decision in favor of Trinity Lutheran would hardly end the legal conflict over school vouchers.
He told colleagues in an email that he expects to move to the new role over the summer, adding he is working with the national schools commissioner Sir David Carter to ensure there are no conflict of interests over decisions he is responsible for.
It's a timely decision, carried out against the backdrop of conflict, migrations and political upheavals all over the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region, as well as on a global scale.
That is to say, that tribal communities often conflicted over extraction, as a result of a historic set of decisions forced upon us, are able to be essential agents of change in this time.
The White House energy plan endorses this policy, even though it conflicts with traditional state authority over transmission siting decisions.
Erik Gerding thinks the discussion about the role of corporations in society isn't over, connecting two cases that would appear to be unrelated — the recent SCOTUS decision in Citizen United v. Federal Election Commission, and Google's conflict with China.
The debate has raged over differing interpretations of «lawful authority», and there are conflicting decisions from the Courts over whether internet service providers can disclose customer name and address information to the police in response to a request.
This is due to seemingly conflicting (or hard - to - decipher) decisions from the Court of Appeal for Ontario over that time.
Tony Mauro's coverage of the Supremes» 5 - 4 decision in Roper v. Simmons highlights the ongoing conflict between Scalia and other justices over nods to international law.
While Canadian courts have repeatedly expressed reluctance to embrace Sullivan - style changes regarding actual malice, 175 three matters must be stressed: first, this proposal is markedly different from Sullivan and does not conflict with the reasons for which the SCC disparaged Sullivan; second, the public figure concept itself predates the Sullivan decision as a defence applicable in infringement of privacy cases and so can be relied on without being dragged into the vortex of debate over the advisability of Sullivan and its progeny; and third, Canadian defamation law already recognizes that certain plaintiffs require different treatment vis - à - vis the remedies available to them, 176 which can be construed as a latent foundation for acceptance of the public figure concept.
A 5 - member panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal released a significant, 150 - paragraph reasoned decision this morning involving conflicts of laws and when Ontario should take jurisdiction over out - of - province defendants — see:
The NS decision to go its own way creates two conflicting lines of authority on the issue of the deductibility of CPP disability benefits under the SEF 44 endorsement in Atlantic Canada — and uncertainty over which road PEI and NL will follow.
When parents don't agree about how decisions should be made or what living arrangements should be in place, the conflict can take over and take hold.
Twenty years ago, when Canadians were first debating how best to address potential conflicts over frozen embryos, the government - appointed Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies recommended that gamete providers be jointly required to make decisions regarding the disposition of their embryos prior to gametes being retrieved or embryos created, and to indicate their preferences in consent forms that would be binding for the clinic involved.
As expected from the Court, there were times when the Chief Justice directly found herself in conflict with the government over Charter rights, notably in the unanimous 2010 decision in Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr that concluded the government had violated Omar Khadr's s. 7 rights.
Yet this decision demonstrates what many have feared: the temptation for courts will be to assert jurisdiction over online activities and leave it to the parties to sort out potential conflicts.
Unfortunately, the stresses of the entrepreneurial world and disagreements over business decisions can quickly bring conflict, anger, and resentment into your business relationship.
Sadly, many (but certainly not all) divorce attorneys approach essentially all divorcing couples assuming the parties are in an extreme state of conflict and need the attorney to take over the case and make decisions for them (or work through the courts for the judge to make all of the decisions).
Since Dr. Gottman, author of The Relationship Cure, started his Love Lab, more than 100 couples have agreed to talk about their subjects of chronic conflict — the distribution of household tasks, decisions about the children, the management of family finances, relations with in - laws, disagreements over smoking and drinking, and so on.
In April 2003, it further announced a separation of powers between ATSIC's policy making and service delivery roles as an interim measure to remove the potential for conflicts of interest in decision - making over funding.
However, in a collaborative case, the parents have control over the process, the decisions that are made, and the parenting arrangement, all with the help of a mental health professional that is trained to handle custody related conflicts.
This interim measure will promote good governance and accountability by removing the potential for conflicts of interest in decision making over funding.
Joint custody * increases *, not decreases, covert resentment and conflict, because it permits the parent who is not spending the day - to - day time raising the children and operating the household to exercise veto power over decisions made by the other, and if so inclined, to meddle and interfere, creating stalemate between the two parents, followed by power plays attempting to break it.
It's knowing when to get involved and how to get involved, whether it's a decision to let this child try to sort out this conflict he's having with another child over who had the truck first.
Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual beliefs that place high value on taking personal responsibility for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.
She has worked with 1000s of families of divorce and conflict over the past 12 years as a child family investigator, parenting coordinator / decision - maker, children's therapist and divorce and parenting educator for the state of MN and CO..
For over 25 years I have helped hundreds of clients resolve both personal and interpersonal conflict, learn to make fair and successful decisions and / or deal with heartbreak surrounding tragedy concerning loved ones.»
Families are beginning to realize that even though they are in conflict, they should still have control over these major decisions.
With Parents Aging, Squabbling Siblings Turn to Elder Mediation» AARP Bulletin «Mediators Help Families with Tough Choices of Aging» NPR Morning Edition «The Caregivers: Sibling disputes over care» CBS Evening News Video «Mediators Save Caregivers» Relationships» CBSNews.com «Mediators Ease Decisions on Elders» Boston Globe «Elder Mediation: Optimizing Major Family Transitions» Marquette Elder's Advisor Law Review «When Aging Leads to Family Conflict» Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
Consequently, the adolescents may attempt to gain control over these decisions, a process that may be associated with more conflict between parents and adolescents (Holmbeck & O'Donnell, 1991).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z