Sentences with phrase «conflicting opinions on the issue»

Although there are numerous conflicting opinions on the issue of breastfeeding during pregnancy, no research has ever found an increased risk of miscarriage in women who continue breastfeeding an older child during pregnancy.

Not exact matches

The major newspapers and public radio rejoice at how easy it turns out to be to change public opinion on an issue that many had feared would be fraught with conflict for years to come.

(i) The Committee on Ethics may, in its discretion, issue public or private advisory opinions with respect to questions of ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and other matters arising under this Article.

Wayne Hawley of the Conflicts of Interest Board said the board has not issued a public opinion on the Palma case.

«Public opinion regarding climate change is likely to remain divided as long as the political elites send out conflicting messages on this issue,» lead researcher Robert Brulle, a professor of sociology and environmental science at Drexel University in Philadelphia, said in a statement.

Paul Peterson interviews Robert Shapiro, an expert on public opinion, about how the partisan divide in education policy is shifting, as issues of school quality and accountability have produced «conflicted liberals,» at the same time that the presidential election is creating «conflicted conservatives.»

As Mike told me in his answer, it's sometimes difficult for non-expert to make his own opinion on a climatic issue, when there is a conflict.

Finding that conflicting decisions within the 2nd Circuit had left the Rule 23 standard unsettled there, the opinion conducted an in - depth review of case law on the issue, including Sotomayor's Visa Check case.

But what if every time a colleague outside your firm asked for your opinion on a legal issue, you became conflicted out of representing any party whose interests were opposed to those of... [more]

In addition to my advocacy practice, I provide legal opinions and practical advice to lawyers and law firms on their professional obligations, including confidentiality issues, law practice management, and conflicts of interest.

(c) If an opinion which conflicts with a prior opinion of this Court has been issued fewer than thirty (30) days before the issuing panel makes a recommendation for an en banc hearing, the issuing panel shall vacate and withdraw the conflicting opinion, pending the full Court's determination on whether to consider the case en banc.

An en banc proceeding may be initiated by the recommendation of a majority of the judges on the panel issuing or preparing the conflicting opinion.

This provision is also interesting in that it appears to conflict more or less directly with the U.N.'s own Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, who has issued an opinion that such cut - offs are likely inconsistent with the right to free expression enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (A / HRC / 17.27):

1) we agree to disagree:) 2) supremacy of EU law for the EU system is the equivalent of the hard core of constitutional values that some national Courts defend against EU (and ECHR)- it is not a matter of «legitimacy» or «patriotism» but of using a «lower rank» instrument (accession treaty) to interfere with a treaty rule: the identical issue is for States who have a «rigid» constitution (alike the Treaty binds the CIEU): the accession treaty to ECHR or EU has a «lower rank» than the Constitution itself, so that the national Constitutional Court can not accept it can derogate to a higher ranking rule - usually they will find a way to reconcile the «construction» of the two set of rules, but if they are requested of an opinion on the point of principle, they will always say that in the very end, if all other paths have been explored to avoid the conflict, eventually it is the Constitution and neither ECHR nor EUwhich prevails.

But what if every time a colleague outside your firm asked for your opinion on a legal issue, you became conflicted out of representing any party whose interests were opposed to those of that colleague's clients?

Naeema Choudry, partner at Eversheds, says: «The issue of maternity rights for surrogate parents caused confusion last year when two Advocates General gave conflicting opinions on the same day, highlighting the complexity of EU discrimination law in this area.

Conflicting opinions had been issued by the different state Courts of Appeals on whether or not to permit relocations.

When a marriage counselor views the problem, the couple get an objective opinion on the conflict which allows them to properly examine the issue and fix it and also understand the relationship better.

However, if there is a difference in opinion, then the time spent on this issue, and subsequently including this information in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) can reduce conflict and unnecessary future litigation.