Although parenting coordination can produce evidence, its primary purpose is to help resolve
conflicts about the implementation of parenting plans made in an agreement or final order.
Not exact matches
The unions themselves see little or no
conflict between their support for the standards and their concerns
about their
implementation and use.
(I'm going to bracket technical concerns
about the
implementation of the Recommendation, which really reduce to drafting matters — e.g., presumably the statement of principles will be drafted in such a way that it does not
conflict with lawyers» duties to their clients (for example, presumably a criminal defence lawyer will not be put in a position where their representation of a client charged with or convicted of a hate crime is somehow a breach of the statement of principles).)
• Assisting the parties in creating an agreed - upon, structured guideline for
implementation of the parenting plan; • Developing guidelines for communication between the parties and suggesting appropriate resources to assist the parties in learning communication skills; • Informing the parties
about resources to assist them in improving parenting skills; • Assisting the parties in realistically identifying the sources and causes of
conflict between them, including but not limited to identifying each party's contribution to the
conflict, when appropriate; and • Assisting the parties in developing parenting strategies to minimize
conflict.
The Court of Criminal Appeal of the Northern Territory also noted that to date «consultation with Aboriginal communities
about (these) principles has too often been perfunctory» and suggested that it may be an appropriate matter for HREOC «to give consideration to the
implementation of educational programs
about (
conflicts between customary law and criminal codes) in Aboriginal communities».