Not exact matches
† Because many of the
case - control studies demonstrated a protective effect of breastfeeding against SIDS
in univariate analysis but not when
confounding factors were taken into account, 62,184,198,231,238 these results suggested that
factors associated with breastfeeding, rather than breastfeeding itself, are protective.
This provoked a strong rebuttal by wildlife ecologist Graeme Caughley, who suggested that because the
factors that may have resulted
in this irruption were «hopelessly
confounded,» a
case study of the Kaibab provided an ineffective example of top - down control.
In a prospective European case - cohort study stratified by sex, overall effects tended to be slightly stronger in men compared with women, although adjustment for confounding factors like obesity, physical activity, or educational level attenuated the association in men but strengthened it in women (135
In a prospective European
case - cohort study stratified by sex, overall effects tended to be slightly stronger
in men compared with women, although adjustment for confounding factors like obesity, physical activity, or educational level attenuated the association in men but strengthened it in women (135
in men compared with women, although adjustment for
confounding factors like obesity, physical activity, or educational level attenuated the association
in men but strengthened it in women (135
in men but strengthened it
in women (135
in women (135).
In particular I don't understand what you mean by «integral factors» and «confounding factors» in this cas
In particular I don't understand what you mean by «integral
factors» and «
confounding factors»
in this cas
in this
case.
It has been suggested that the positive associations reported
in case - control studies may have resulted from recall bias or
confounding by
factors such as smoking.19, 34 However, because we observed an association between coffee and risk of MI among carriers of the * 1F allele, and not among those homozygous for the * 1A allele, the associations between coffee and MI are unlikely due to recall bias or residual
confounding.
ENSO is a
confounding factor of course because the tropical variability
in the model is not correlated with the observed record (and is too weak
in any
case), but
in the real world was coincident with both El Chichon and Pinatubo.