One of the main efforts of the AGW advocacy community (as distinct from any individual at random within that group) has been to
confuse feedback issues with gas theory issues, to prevent discussion of any challenges to their views by blocking publication, and to demonize and marginalize anyone questioning their data or disagreeing with their interpretations.
There are a whole host of conventions / semantics that have evolved around the topic of climate
feedbacks that
confuse people, I would like to clarify these, and also further explore the
issue as to whether there might be better (or at least other) ways to approach this
issue.