Sentences with phrase «confused by that argument»

I am always confused by this argument, because it truly sounds like people want to use keeping the child as a punishment for se.x.

Many good people are confused by arguments for «marriage equality» that sound persuasive but lead in unintended and hurtful directions.

Nonetheless, I am still confused by the argument that you aren't seeking to discredit a person's argument through the (acknowledged) act of (as least in your mind) «discredit [ing that] person.»

I'm confused by this argument.

Not exact matches

On the reading I propose, the Reformation schism was brought about instead by contingent human choices in a confused historical context defined less by clear and principled theological argument (though that of course was present) than by a peculiar and distinctively sixteenth - century combination of overheated and ever - escalating polemics, cold - blooded Realpolitik, and fervid apocalyptic dreaming.

Quit trying to confuse the argument by saying that Christians want to deny people access to God!

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Mehta may be as confused by Lewis» conversion story as Leah's, but the young mathematician's story is evidence that some roads to Christ involve profoundly intellectual journeys and that the moral argument continues to be a powerful reason for sceptics to embrace God.

There was first his return to the original argument without, we may say, benefit of Descartes, who confused the issue by asking for the cause of the idea of God.

@JJPawn: So next time you attempt to try and confuse or trick forum members using a fallacious argument, make sure it is logical; honest and backed up by undisputed facts, otherwise you will meet people like me who will discredit you.

From what was, at times, a confused and halting justification for this position your correspondent gleaned three interrelated strands of argument: that the lands of Judea and Samaria are the Jewish people's «homeland;» that while the area is also claimed as a homeland by the Palestinians this merely means the territory is contested and does not detract from the Jewish claim and finally; that the Palestinians lost their right to this land by engaging in violence in 1948 and 1967.

In many respects the no immigration controls argument is idealism, and something that confuses tactics needed now by socialists in a capitalist world with what we would want in a socialist world where such a thing could be envisaged.

After doing so, I can help investigators sharpen their logic by, for instance, suggesting information they should add to justify their proposed research activities more convincingly or identifying red herrings (arguments that are not centrally relevant to the grant topic and may confuse the reviewer).

Its argument, most recently made in David Cohen's Teaching and Its Predicaments, is that America's teachers are being set up to fail by a system that is fragmented, divided, and confused about its mission.

Austria's 97 Years of Loss This article by John Authers stresses how difficult it is to time the market because the mean (to which the argument goes that everything will revert) itself inflates, rendering the data at the time of the bubble much more confusing that in hindsight.

Start an argument by being focused or maybe even one - sided instead of just by being confused or simply too big or small.

Even people with an academic degree can easily can get confused by some of the arguments raised by skeptics.

And being scientifically literate, I am not confused by many of the arguments.

So, in case there is now or there will be some newbie to these arguments who may have been confused by the disinformation you (and Memphis) have been producing here, here is an example from a genuine study to remind of what the AGWSF fisics passes off as real physics, as used generally in all the variety of science studies because this has been introduced into the education system and, apart from the applied scientists in the field who can spot this is fake, the majority simply take it as if real physics basics:

David Rose mislead his readership with his simplistic math argument and by confusing an absence of a warming trend as a significant statistical signal for a plateau.

I have used your information in many arguments with people who have been confused by the misinformation industry.

This seems the strongest candidate for identifying Pielke Jr.'s point of view, and as Neil Fisher deigns not to clarify, to spare him charges of plagiarism (which would, by the way, be scientific misconduct), we'll just say Neil obviously confused the link to Pielke Jr. with Revkin due the difficulty in editing on WordPress, but that this Pielkeism represents Neil Fisher's argument too.

We have learned jurors can be quickly bored by legal arguments and hopelessly confused about injuries, medicine, medical malpractice and medical issues.

Considering what a mess the Monday testimony and lawyer argument on the effect of the new claim construction was (because, frankly, both parties had previously hedged their bets as they didn't know what the appeals court would do), the jury is probably now very confused about it (and Judge Koh did the right thing by denying both parties» motions for judgment as a matter of law since there are reasonable arguments for and against infringement, for and against validity).

This argument seems to confuse judgments that MAKE policy with those that REFLECT or IMPLEMENT policy choices made by others.

This philosophy is a well - trotted - out argument used by many left - wing, as well as by some confused right - wing, political theorest economists, in the name of of pursuing so - called equity within the operation of a now - centralist, so - called freely inspired, but controlled nevertheless, free market system of distributing goods and services in a manner serving the best economic interests of the most people most of the time... yes?