This may seem silly on television, but it does wonders for helping a family stay
connected after an argument.
Not exact matches
At first she's unsure she wants to revisit the material; she doesn't feel comfortable playing the older character and she makes a compelling
argument that she's still
connected to the young character that she played early in her career but
after discussions with the director and pressure from her agent and her assistant, she agrees to take on the role and the challenge.
While it may be worthwhile to ask if the GCC ultimately did not drop skeptic climate scientists
after seeing convincing skeptic
arguments, a far bigger question to ask is this: Is it purely coincidental that Matt Pawa — of the Oakland / San Fransisco cases currently citing old GCC material — seems to have a potential appearance of being
connected with the 2009 NYT GCC documents story?
And when you can make repair attempts, like apologizing
after an
argument, it helps to decrease tension and make you feel more
connected to your partner.