In these respects it is like
conscious human experiences.
In
conscious human experience this becomes a very significant factor, so much so that we hold a human person accountable for the consequences of his acts and do not do the same for microbes.
Now, to speak of
conscious human experience in Whiteheadian categories is to speak of a regnant nexus of actual occasions which are enjoying rich supplemental phases.
Just as
our conscious human experience unconsciously feels the unconscious feelings of the cells of the brain and achieves a unity of its own life of feeling, so the Totality that is God feels our feelings in the unity of perfect experience.
This hardening occurs to the extent that particular gaps, such as that between self -
conscious human experience and that of animals, is asserted to be fundamentally different from all the other gaps to be found in reality.
Not exact matches
Compare with James's view, quoted above, the following passage of Charles Hartshorne: «If it be asked how the individual can be aware of this infinite range if his
experience is finite, the answer is that it is only the distinct or fully
conscious aspect of
human experience which is finite; while the faint, slightly
conscious background embraces all past time» (Beyond Humanism.
Theism explains everything we observe, argues Swinburne, including «the fact that there is a universe at all, that scientific laws operate within it, that it contains
conscious animals and
humans with very complex intricately organized bodies, that we have abundant opportunities for developing ourselves and the world, as well as the more particular data that
humans report miracles and have religious
experiences.»
I also believe that, in spite of Whitehead's reluctance to concede privileged status to
human occasions of
experience, the introduction of the wide range of
conscious anticipation of the future which humanity represents in comparison to lesser types of existence also introduces justice as a characteristic of the specially
human aim at harmonious beauty.
The within of things we
experience as
humans is richness of
conscious experience.
They had inculcated a deep sense of sin and a
conscious need of personal salvation; they had overpassed national and racial lines and had made religious faith a matter of individual conviction; they had emphasized faith in immortality and the need of assurance concerning it; they had bound their devotees together in mystical societies of brethren fired with propagandist zeal; and they had accentuated the interior nature of religious
experience in terms of an, indwelling Presence, through whom
human life could be «deicized.»
The theory generalizes the repetition of the past that is evident in
conscious, mnemonic occasions of
human experience into a feature of all actual occasions,
human or nonhuman.
Because of this, and because
human experience is so complex,
conscious introspection is not the best way to examine
experience for its most fundamental elements.
The stream of
conscious experience and synthetic activity is the dominant society of actual occasions in
human (and animal) bodies, being influenced by subordinate organic processes in those bodies, then influencing them in turn in an ongoing dialectic of causality and creativity.
the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad
experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the
conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The
experiences for us
humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.
The stream of
human conscious experience and creative activity (the
human mind or soul) has one vitally important property in process thought that it does not have in Cartesian metaphysics: it is spatially (as well as temporally) extended.
It is therefore possible and even probable that they
experience sensations and memory, that is to say,
conscious phenomena, but surely not in the sense of
human experience which is connected with a concept of one's own self.
Basically, his solution takes the form of distinguishing two different levels of
human experience, or of more or less
conscious thinking about
experience, on only the deeper of which is there an
experience of God that is both direct and universal.
The former — religious
experience — need not be highly articulated nor even highly
conscious of God as God; it may be vague, diffused, and unformed, yet also a deliverance of what it feels like to be dependent upon a reality greater than anything
human or natural.
We find such centralized control present in our individual
human experience, and we have immediate introspective awareness of the
conscious experience that functions in this control.
As explained in chapter two, Hartshorne regards
human conscious experience as our only reliable key to unlock the mysteries of reality.
Popper indeed believes that the reduction of chemistry to physics, of biology to chemistry, of animal
conscious or subconscious
experience to biology, and of consciousness itself and the creativeness of the
human mind to animal
experience, are all problems the complete success of which seems most unlikely if not impossible.
Thus
human conscious experience is our only reliable key to unlock the mysteries of reality.
More specifically, what kind of physiological event does an occasion of
human conscious experience become?
The term «
conscious superject» can be taken to refer to the physiological correlate of a moment of ordinary
human experience, although this does not exhaust its technical meaning.
This
experience «can be used to include not only
human and amoebic
experience,
conscious or non-
conscious as the case may be, but also non-
conscious taking account of the environment which characterizes molecular, atomic and quantum events as well» (LL 131).
Also, what I call «
conscious occasions are what Whitehead calls «final percipient occasions of
human experience.
In terms of the above discussion of what is truly primary in
human experience, we are now in a position to understand a statement in which Whitehead summarizes how the «more concrete fact» from which science abstracts should be conceived: «The emotional appetitive elements in our
conscious experience are those which most closely resemble the basic elements of all physical
experience» (PR 248).
It is not true that liturgical worship entirely fails to speak to the strictly
conscious levels of
human experience; it does indeed speak to these, but it has richer connotations and implications; and it is these which do most of the «work» in liturgical as distinguished from didactic or other types of Christian worship.
If one accepts this doctrine, one can account for the highly complex
conscious experiences of
human beings in a fully non-reductionistic way, while at the same locating
human beings fully in the context of the natural world.
Indeed one might say that liturgical worship by and large speaks not so much to the
conscious attention of its participants as to those profound and almost unconsciously
experienced areas of
human life where men live in terms of feeling - tone, of unutterable emotion, and of profound subconscious relationships, with an almost intuitive awareness of the «more» which is deep down in the structure of reality.
In other words, these biblical stories, which are not self -
conscious literary creations but genuine emergents from the
experience of a religious community — these stories are attempts to express an understanding of the relation in which God actually stands to
human life, and they are true in any really important sense only if that understanding is correct.
The events in the nerves leading to the brain succeeded the events in the eye and were in turn followed by the events in the brain and finally by the impact upon the
conscious human occasion of
experience.
As the level of transcendent meaning attempts to gather our
human consciousness into its embrace it becomes enfleshed in forms that are familiar to us in our
conscious experience.
To be sure, his panpsychism holds that the ultimate constituent units of all things are atomic; but they are atoms of
conscious experience» at least remotely resembling
human mental
experiences.
It is through symbols, those of art, poetry and especially religion, that the intrinsic value of cosmic reality insinuates itself into the
conscious experience of those organisms that we call
human beings.
The reduction of chemistry to physics, of biology to chemistry, of animal
conscious or subconscious
experience to biology, and of consciousness itself and the creativeness of the
human mind to animal
experience, are all problems that are unlikely if not impossible to succeed.
Its co-founders, Sean Kelly and Andy Mackensen, attribute this growth not only to
HUMAN's successful business model — which has ensured that its operators and locations
experience unparalleled success - but also to its
conscious culture, which has inspired social entrepreneurs around the world.
«On the contrary, I think that we need to come to terms with fear because the
conscious feeling of fear is a key part of
human experience and an important factor in psychopathology.
What robots can never have, which
humans have, argues Bringsjord, is phenomenological consciousness: «the first - hand
experience of
conscious thought», as Justin Hart of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, puts it.
«Uncomfortable sight from an ancient reflex of the eye: Reflexive system of the
human eye also produces a
conscious visual
experience that may be related to excessive light sensitivity.»
Being mindful of staying
conscious and aware of our senses amplifies our
experience as
human beings.
We must journal, reflect, and ask ourselves how we can learn from our pleasurable and painful
experiences to become more
conscious and aware as
human beings.
The theorist claimed that artistic
experience can change us into more aware and self -
conscious human beings, and inform new ways of being in the world.