Sentences with phrase «conscious level of»

It seems that every kind of intervention should face these implicit processes that do not reach a conscious level of elaboration.

Focus: Group Psychotherapy The conscious level of groups.

These areas are thought to be associated with negative emotion processing (Heller et al., 2003), and the right fusiform gyrus is considered to be critical in processing cues that are above conscious level of perception (supraliminal cues).

For growth and change to take place, a couple needs to move into a conscious level of functioning.

Because behavior problems originate at the level of a dog's emotions and obedience training reflects a more superficial, conscious level of behaviors.

In respect to the way these potentialities or «abstract entities» are actualized, Collingwood, however, makes a distinction between actualization on the conscious level of thought and on the non-conscious level of material reality.

Process suggests that most of the relations that we experience are much deeper than the conscious levels of our being.

It is not true that liturgical worship entirely fails to speak to the strictly conscious levels of human experience; it does indeed speak to these, but it has richer connotations and implications; and it is these which do most of the «work» in liturgical as distinguished from didactic or other types of Christian worship.

Not exact matches

«Despite the injunction, we made the conscious decision to raise pay across the board to exceed the threshold for some of our managers,» Adam Shapiro, another Shake Shack spokesperson, wrote in an email, adding that managers already earning above that level were given raises as well, to avoid so - called wage compression.

Being conscious regarding resources and spending habits is very sensible and can be a lot of fun, but of course there is a certain savings level where it does not make any sense to decrease spendings even further.

It has been conscious that a balance needs to be struck between the benefits of monetary stimulus and the medium - term risks associated with rising levels of debt relative to our incomes.

Conscious awareness, memory, and learning depend on a minimal level of electrical activity in the cerebral cortex.

As a result of the brief, violent moment of crisis in which it became conscious at once of its creative power and of its critical faculties, humanity has quite legitimately become hard to move: no stimulus at the level of mere instinct or blind economic necessity will suffice for long to goad it into moving onwards.

There is much empirical evidence for mental operations of high complexity below the level of conscious attention.

A typical case is of a middle - aged business executive who, on a conscious level, desires to stop drinking.

Where before in the unconscious level, time was gathered without being consciously grasped, now there is a conscious gathering of time, so that the past is able to coexist with the present reduplicatively.

It is also entirely consistent with the patterns we notice in cosmic emergence for us to maintain that the human sphere of mentality is now being invited by the «forces of evolution» to leave itself open to an informing and patterning by a yet higher and more «conscious» level.

Not a little of the everlasting new curriculums that are issued from the boards of Christian education is, at some level not clearly conscious, aimed at qualifying the motherly - person image in the direction of masculinity and the intellect — without getting rid of Mom altogether.

But this much is clear: those factors found on the most basic level of conscious experience are precisely those that he attributes to the world at large.

More precisely, from a Whiteheadian standpoint, we should say that, if God is loving, then we all feel this, at some level, all the time, so that the only extraordinary feature of mystical experiences is that in them this feeling of the holy rises to the level of conscious awareness.

However, he does hold that the goal towards which physical processes are directing the behavior of an animal finds conscious expression at the level of spirit by its intuition of the goal's essence under the form of the good.

In this, as Lincoln discovered in the tragic days of the Civil War, we find a level of experience which does the seemingly impossible of making us firm in the right, «as God gives us to see the right,» but also humble because we are conscious that «the Almighty has his own purposes.»

In fact, and although it operates successively on two different levels (that of the purely organic functioning of the mother, and that of her conscious action applied to another consciousness) what takes place is one and the same process pursued externally from one end of the chain to the other.

In every present moment we are «aiming» — at the human level with a genuine degree of conscious awareness — at a future.

To become fully human, man has to achieve, on a self - conscious level, a process that operates on a non-conscious level, in all living things, namely, the synthesis of individuation and interaction, or of independence and interdependence... Accordingly, God as the power that makes for salvation is the cosmic process of organicity, which, in sub-human creatures, synthesizes individuation and interaction on an unconscious level, and in man, on a conscious level.

This process happens not just on a conscious level, but rather is the fundamental nature of reality.

I sympathize with your outburst and you indeed are correct at an «etiquette - conscious», neutral level, unless one decides to give this area of inquiry some serious thought.

The meaning of history is the creation of the human level of existence when human level means that level where there can be indefinite increase in range and depth of values appreciated and evils distinguished; indefinite increase in range and depth of what can be known and controlled; indefinite increase in the depth and complexity of man's subjectivity, both conscious and unconscious.

And because consciousness is not a simple phenomenon but admits of differences, of «levels» of consciousness, of more or less complex supplemental phases, our conscious experience can be more or less temporal.

The building block electronic and protonic actual occasions are, in the case of human beings, swept into vastly more complex, Chinese box - like sets of containing societies within which there are social levels that can be identified with cells, others which answer to Aristotle's levels of tissues and organs, and which finally are presided over by what Whitehead refers to as the regnant nexus, a social thread of complex temporal inheritance which, Whitehead suggests, wanders from part to part of the brain, is the seat of conscious direction of the organism as a whole, and answers to what in Plato and Aristotle is called the soul.

This reflection process need not be at explicitly conscious levels for its effectiveness; it is enough that one has absorbed the institutional purpose to whatever degree into the internal structures of one's identity, and then, in the naturalness of a relational world, woven that purpose into the projections of one's own influence upon others.

Socialism replaces bourgeois society's objectified, rationalistic view of humanity with a new appreciation of the human being in terms of a spiritual and vital «center,» lying beneath the level of the conscious mind.

Basically, his solution takes the form of distinguishing two different levels of human experience, or of more or less conscious thinking about experience, on only the deeper of which is there an experience of God that is both direct and universal.

On the one hand, he claims that our concept of «know» comes partly from «some dim but direct awareness of deity,» which may often be driven below the level of conscious thought, even if it is never wholly absent there; in a word, we have a feeling of God as distinct from thinking or knowing God (1970a, 155; cf. 1962, 110).

The distinction Hartshorne insists on making here as applied to our present question can be expressed by saying that, whereas mere experience or feeling of God can be not only direct but immediate, high - level thought or cognition of God, being mediated, as it is, by the conscious judgment or interpretation of such feeling, is of necessity mediate.

made us conscious of our need to grow, to move from the more - or-less satisfying but static level... a helpful start to deeper levels of communication.

And since the world has a radical freedom, being in fact the realm of choice, such as we know at the human level in conscious decision but which in differing mode is present at every level, this may be not only a «natural» recalcitrance but a quite definitely elected refusal to move.

In the organic responses of the adverbial level, selective processes operate according to what is relevant to the fulfilment of the organism as a whole.12 At the same time, although some selectivity may occur, adverbial responses tend to take the character of «total assertions» of the whole organism about the whole object it confronts.13 At the accusative level, or level of conscious symbolization, whole masses of irrelevant detail are excluded according to some principle of relevance operating in consciousness at the time.

Millions of persons suffer from severe guilt feelings which are below the conscious level.

Unless he accepts it at a heart as well as at a head level, he will convey a judgmental attitude in spite of his conscious intentions.

When biology snaps out of this restriction it will become the basic science because it will be studying those individual entities where feelings exist at the conscious level.

Feelings don't have to be conscious, Consciousness enters only at the highest levels of organization of the living organism.

Why is it better to talk about a probability that is an actual state of a body (which in the sleeping state is presumably not the same as waking), than to talk about the dynamics of a telic being which, at the personal level, is to be understood in terms of activity - potentials by which it maintains itself at conscious, unconscious, and self - conscious levels?

In consequence we have a description of the world that allows room for decisions made by particular «occasions» or moments — and these decisions, whether at the conscious level in man or at lower or nonconscious levels elsewhere, make a difference.

Then come complex multicellular organisms, societies of animals with new emergent properties at the ecosystem level, and, finally conscious beings who create culture, use symbolic language — and experience the first intimations of transcendence.

Monad's were for Leibniz just as real on the subhuman, even subanimal, levels, as on the human level; they were merely much less capable of thought and definite conscious recollections and perceptions, more limited to simple feeling and extremely short - run memory of what has just happened.

The chiasm enacted through physical feelings not only remains beneath the level of conscious experience, but also below that of clear, sharp sensory perception in feelings of presentational immediacy.

At a human level, creativity is the «prius» of all our feeling, acting, thinking, and hoping, of our reality as language - speakers and as conscious deciders.

As the level of transcendent meaning attempts to gather our human consciousness into its embrace it becomes enfleshed in forms that are familiar to us in our conscious experience.

At a deeper level the lack of interest in critical reflective reason may be a form of anti-intellectualism but the conscious irrationalism of groups such as the «romantic German youth movement is quite missing.