Sentences with phrase «consensus model as»

That successful performance is achieved through the utilization of both a permissioned and prioritized consensus model as well as the Hypernode Protocol.

Not exact matches

By employing a rudimentary combination consensus algorithm containing both Ethereum's standard PoW as well as its future PoS consensus models, Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin believes risk can be mitigated during the changeover.

[6] Although many young Earth creationists (YECs) are active in the development of creation science, an endeavor that holds that the events as - sociated with supernatural creation can be evidenced and modeled through an interpretation of the scientific method, the consensus among scientists is that creation science is unscientific in both conception and methodology.

Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.

A consensus document that has been recognized as an important model for improving the healthcare and well being of children beginning at birth, the Mother - Friendly Childbirth Initiative has been translated into several languages and is gaining support around the world.

As a preface, the idea of the chart is accurate, in a sense that there is a consensus among political scientists or pretty much anyone else with interest in politics that a multi-axis political spectrum model (like Nolan chart, or the chart you show which is an example of a political compass) is a far better, more accurate, more useful, and overall less...

The results also indicated a need to identify financially sustainable models for patient navigation and clinical survivorship programs, as well as a consensus on core measures.

I don't follow climate science in detail, with all the ins and outs of competing models, but as an interested non-specialist I hope to live long enough to see a consensus explanation emerge!

By Kenneth Richard «Consensus» Science Takes A Hit In 2017 During 2017, 485 scientific papers have been published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate's fundamental control knob... or that otherwise question the efficacy of climate models or the related «consensus» positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media.

As evidenced by the U.S. Department of Education's recent move to allow states flexibility in using growth models to calculate average yearly progress, there is a growing consensus that indicators of teacher effectiveness should be based on student growth rather than on predetermined levels of performance.

Lohr, C.A., L.J. Cox, and C.A. Lepczyk, Patterns of hypothetical wildlife management priorities as generated by consensus convergence models with ordinal ranked data.

It is appropriate to refer to it in the evolutionary past tense, however, as there is more or less a general consensus that the game console business model is the dinosaur in a world of mammals.

Remember, these agencies are using the models and forecasts of the «so - called» consensus view as put forth by the UN IPCC and Mr. Gore, etc..

So, Jacob, if you can show me a theory that makes as much sense of Earth's climate and makes as many verified predictions as the current consensus model and which doesn't imply serious problems due to warming, I'll be the first to pat you on the back.

«Yes, sea ice seems to behaving as the consensus of the climate models have been projecting — more rapid and larger response in the northern high latitudes than anywhere else, flat to possible increase in [southern hemisphere] sea ice as warming takes hold,» he wrote.

Authors concludes that — to the extent that we have simple plausible physical arguments that support the model consensus — we believe that one should have nearly as much confidence in these results as one has in the increase in temperature itself

I am talking about a consensus of multiple lines of evidence (empirical evidence in addition to modeling, logic etc.) When there is a large degree of uncertainty, as there is in climate science, a consensus of evidence is most definitely very important.

So, in fact, models are a plague on humanity; not susceptible of confirmation and taken as «scientific consensus» where none exists.

«Consensus» Science Takes A Hit In 2017 During 2017, 485 scientific papers have been published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate's fundamental control knob... or that otherwise question the efficacy of climate models or the related «consensus» positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media.

But as far as the computer models go, there isn't a useful consensus at the level of detail relevant to assessing human influences,» explained Steven Koonin, who served as «undersecretary for science» in the Energy Department during Obama's first term and now works as director of New York University's Center for Urban Science.

A classic case in point was the discovery that field observations of the loss of arctic sea ice showed that by 2007 it had advanced to a level predicted by the mean of models of that loss as occurring in the 2100s, while that mean was used as the consensus projection in AR4.

Forgot to add: DDT has a 1/2 life of a year or so, orders of magnitude different than the consensus modeling predicted and everyone accepted as gospel.

I don't have much doubt that there has been some mild warming due to AGW, but I think that there are many claims of * possible * catastrophic outcomes (based on sketchy models) that pose as * probable * outcomes and consensus science.

Thanks for the 3 papers, the 1st was a real eye openner but was essentially confirming what I said which is that most model attribution expts based on comparison of historical forcing and runs held at pre - industrial condition suggest long term change is essentially forced.The point is the Karnauskas paper bucks the trend in understanding as expressed by the Ipcc (the consensus or whatever).

The relative dominance of different plant types is also predicted to change, but there is little consensus among the models as to the details.

Thinking the pre-1998 warming phase was of permanent nature, not transient, the consensus climate «experts,» and their sophisticated climate models, predicted this steady warming trend would just drone on year after year, as far as the mind could speculate.

There's of course all the new solar physics models that have been released in the past few years which indicates the sun, not CO2, is the primary climate factor, and they are predicting global cooling as well (and having a difficult time getting published and taken seriously by the «consensus» holders):

I expect that over time as the observational record grows and the models improve, that difference will resolve and a consensus will emerge.

The 2009 Climategate emails and the current effort to prevent public debate through legal action have increased interest in two questionable models that appeared in 1946 as consensus science [1]:

Furthermore, as detailed in a recent review by Cunningham and Marsh (2010), modeling estimates have been unable to help in this regard: there is currently no consensus on the strength of the AMOC in assimilation / re-analysis products, and ocean general circulation models are in disagreement about the strength and variability of the AMOC.

TSI is the only solar variable included in the «consensus» climate models so they have too little 20th century forcing (and hence too high a sensitivity) on this front as well.

A Growing Volume Of Evidence Undercuts «Consensus» Science During the first 6 months of 2017, 285 scientific papers have already been published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate's fundamental control knob... or that otherwise question the efficacy of climate models or the related «consensus» positions commonly endorsed by -LSB-...]

Fear and loathing that humans might destroy life on Earth, as large sections of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would be destroyed three weeks later, on 6 and 9 August 1945, laid the foundation for five unscientific consensus models that still prevail today:

«The models» are spoken of as if they are a sort of wise jury coming to a consensus judgement.

The poster child recently for this absurdity has been the GPS system, and recently there was some clock put on a satellite which they claimed proved speed slowed down the clock, which on closer inspection showed the same wishful thinking as we note in reading the variety of models produced of an alien world with a cold Sun and no atmosphere passing itself off a this one — here, a real world analysis by a real world scientist blanked out by consensus:

During the first 6 months of 2017, 285 scientific papers have already been published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate's fundamental control knob... or that otherwise question the efficacy of climate models or the related «consensus» positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media.

As you see, according to the AR4 — a consensus document written for the UN's IPCC and published in 2007 — models predict the effect of GHG's as distinctly different from that of solar or volcanic forcingAs you see, according to the AR4 — a consensus document written for the UN's IPCC and published in 2007 — models predict the effect of GHG's as distinctly different from that of solar or volcanic forcingas distinctly different from that of solar or volcanic forcings.

As Chris Castro and Dave Gutzler write, there is still a lot of uncertainty about how the monsoon might change, if at all, because «the current generation of global climate models doesn't come close to any consensus as to what the expectation is for a changed monsoon.&raquAs Chris Castro and Dave Gutzler write, there is still a lot of uncertainty about how the monsoon might change, if at all, because «the current generation of global climate models doesn't come close to any consensus as to what the expectation is for a changed monsoon.&raquas to what the expectation is for a changed monsoon.»

Within a few years, after his unprincipled, unsupported and unscientific attacks on climate «sceptics», my opinion had changed, to what it is now, that he's the very model of an unthinking and ill - informed little s ** t. Presenting «evidence» that you haven't checked out yourself is both irresponsible and unscientific, as is accepting «current thinking» or some form of consensus without questioning it in any way.

It reports that over the 1998 - 2012 interval 111 out of 114 climate model runs over-predicted warming, achieving thereby, as it were, a 97 % consensus.

Returning to the issue of future projections of aggregate activity (PDI, as in Fig. 1), while there remains a lack of consensus among various studies on how Atlantic hurricane PDI will change, no model we have analyzed shows a sensitivity of Atlantic hurricane PDI to greenhouse warming as large as that implied by the observed Atlantic PDI / local SST relationship shown in Figures 1 (top panel).

Finally, there's consensus that we can not look at climate forecasts — in particular, probabilistic forecasts — the same way we view weather predictions, and none of us would sell climate - model output, either at face value or after statistical analysis, as a reliable representation of the complete range of possible futures.

And just as there is no credible alternative theory to evolution, there is no credible model of Earth's climate other than the consensus model.

I'm not very up on this stuff, but if you'll indulge my dumbness for a moment, the consensus here seems to be saying that something that can never be measured directly is used as a baseline for the scary model forecasts (questionable feedbacks added) that the IPCC has 95 % confidence in?

Of course, if the consensus climate models turn out to be falsified just a few years later, average temperature having remained at levels not even admitted to be have been physically possible, the authority of consensus will have been exposed as rather weak.

The product of this socioeconomic research resulted in my attending the 2001 United Nations World Conference on the Elimination of Racism in Durban, South Africa, at which I successfully advocated as a credentialed member of a NGO, for the inclusion of mediation processes based on my Transformative Voice and Global - Meta Power Structural Arrangements models, in the conference's Declaration and Programme of Action, which was adopted by consensus by the international member states of the United Nations.

Casper provides a model where consensus is as cheap as possible for everyone, except for hackers conducting an attack.

The initial consensus appears to be that while the iPad isn't very surprising in terms of form factor and features, it's a solid entry - level model that benefits from added Apple Pencil support.Engadget said the new iPad is «as fluid and fast as the iPad Pro,» which it described as an «impressive feat.»

Both the larger platform and the Stratis token are actually based on bitcoin, with some modifications and additions such as implementing a proof - of - stake consensus model rather than the proof - of - work model used by bitcoin.

[79] Part of the Government's commitment is an initiative to explore with aboriginal people the possible establishment of government resource centres to assist aboriginal people with developing models of governance, providing guidance on community consensus building and dispute resolution, and serving as a resource on best practices.