Sentences with phrase «consensus on anthropogenic climate change»

Scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change.

In terms of your request for something substantial, I responded to your original claim that «the theory relies on computer models» with a link to a RealClimate post that shows this claim is not correct — rather than computer models, the foundations of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change are built upon our understanding of how the atmosphere works and how we are changing it by emitting greenhouse gases.

Not exact matches

For example, Saunders quotes William Gray's off - the - cuff criticism of a study by Naomi Oreskes that demonstrated the existence of an overwhelming consensus in the peer - reviewed scientific literature on the reality of anthropogenic climate change (see our previous discussion of that study).

There is broad scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change but there still a huge amount of ongoing research into many of the details.

Is there really «consensus» in the scientific community on the reality of anthropogenic climate change?

In 2013, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report stated a clear expert consensus that: «It is extremely likely [defined as 95 - 100 % certainty] that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic [human - caused] increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic forcings together.»

The consensus in climate science is that recent climate change is overwhelmingly identified as anthropogenic in cause, and furthermore (as per AAR5 on Impacts) there is a consensus that climate change will have significant impacts that while a value judgement can quite reasonably be described as «dangerous».

The various official Conservative policy statements cited above contain no implicit or explicit acknowledgnment of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic (human - caused) global warming, as outlined in the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Science magazine supports the prevailing view, stating, «There is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change» that accounts for «most of the observed warming over the last 50 years» (Oreskes, 2004).

«We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, examining 11944 climate abstracts from 1991 — 2011 matching the topics «global climate change» or «global warming».

Morano then said that the oft - touted 97 percent consensus on climate change being real and anthropogenic (meaning human - caused) was illegitimate because less than 100 scientists were polled to arrive at the 97 percent value.»

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature — Abstract — Environmental Research Letters — IOPscience We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, examining 11944 climate abstracts from 1991 — 2011 matching the topics «global climate change» or «global warming».

The term «enforcers of the climate consensus» is a bitter and resentful way to refer to competent and productive climate scientists, in particular those who care enough about the current and future impact of anthropogenic climate change on Earth's ecosystems and on humanity.

Given that the majority view here on WUWT appears to be that the scientific consensus is simply wrong (or non-existent)-- as opposed to mendacious — I should have said ``... if anthropogenic climate change is a false alarm you — and your whole team — will without doubt deserve Nobel Prizes»

Peiser has long opposed mainstream science's conclusions about anthropogenic global warming; in 2005 Peiser said he had data which refuted an article published in Science Magazine, claiming 100 % of peer - reviewed research papers on climate change agreed with the scientific consensus of global warming.

Still, they find a strong consensus on human causation of climate change: 87.4 % of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (question v007).

Cook found a 97 % consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature on climate change.

In our paper, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature, we analysed over 12,000 papers listed in the «Web Of Science» between 1991 to 2011 matching the topic «global warming» or «global climate change».

I challenge all who, like me, have doubts about one or another aspect of the conventional consensus regarding catastrophic unprecedented anthropogenic global climate change to see our mission as changing Mr Connolley's mind on that topic; not destroying his general opposition.

Naomi Oreskes, from the University of California, noted in an article in Science in 2004: «there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change.

Of all the papers, 75 % fell into the first three categories, either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view; 25 % dealt with methods or paleoclimate, taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change.