There seems to be
no consensus on causation except the known added risk with deep chested and giant breed dogs and stress.
Not exact matches
In addition to the issues Rob raised regarding
causation, point 4 of the
consensus statement as articulated
on RealClimate implies a cost benefit analysis, and requires an assessment of what level of harm / damage is unacceptable, and an assessment of the cost and likelihood of avoiding it.
Still, they find a strong
consensus on human
causation of climate change: 87.4 % of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (question v007).