Sentences with phrase «consensus on certainty»

If Dr Curry's scientific position is «there is a considerable amount of uncertainty, therefore we should at least be able to draw some boundaries around them before pushing for a consensus on certainty» (I hope my paraphrase is close to the mark), then advocating for a change in the process of conducting climate science follows logically.

Not exact matches

From there, they inferred the consensus temperature change and the degree of certainty about the change, Cressie, the author of two books on spatial statistics, told LiveScience in an email.
In 2013, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report stated a clear expert consensus that: «It is extremely likely [defined as 95 - 100 % certainty] that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic [human - caused] increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic forcings together.»
As we have pointed out before, in 1992, the «consensus» was characterised very differently to today, and the UNFCCC agreements proceeded not on the basis of scientific evidence and certainty, but according to the precautionary principle.
There is no one consensus on just how soon they'll occur, and how bad they'll be, because science, not being in the business of making prophecies, is not able to say with absolute certainty just what's going to happen in the future.
Penetrating both the pretense that the consensus arguments are «all about the science,» and the exaggerated claims of certainty, is a great service, regardless of where one sits on the political spectrum.
I see it happen often when some «skeptics» misrepresent the «certainty» of the «consensus» perspective on AGW.
Given the acknowledged uncertainties and limitations expressed in the title, it is hard to believe that the graph showcased in the paper would later become the poster child of certainty for a scientific consensus on global warming — but it would become just that.
As to your fifth point, on what basis do you conclude with certainty that AGW consensus has taken on a «religious» status.
Recent arguments dominating the public discussion on climate change seem to have been about the «scientific consensus» achieving certainty, rather than advising caution in the face of doubt.
The theme of the conference, «Restoring the Scientific Method,» acknowledges the fact that claims of scientific certainty and predictions of climate catastrophes are based on «post-normal science,» which substitutes claims of consensus for the scientific method.
The theme of the conference was «Restoring the Scientific Method,» and based on the premise that «claims of scientific certainty and predictions of climate catastrophes are based on «post-normal science,» which substitutes claims of consensus for the scientific method.»
The ECJ approach neglects the negative effects on fundamental principles built by a national constitutional consensus and enshrined in the Constitutions, such as legal certainty in criminal matters (v.g. the Taricco case) and to that constitutional courts can not look the other way.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z