Sentences with phrase «consensus on exactly»

It seems that there is a consensus that something is happening, and no consensus on exactly what.

There is no consensus on exactly how to do this, but there is clear evidence that good teachers produce consistently better student test scores, and that teachers who do not need to be identified and counseled.

That should give companies confidence that they will make money, although as yet there's no consensus on exactly how to do it (see «Superbug crisis: Global push to save antibiotics begins «-RRB-.

Not exact matches

The memory - eating disease, expected to afflict 15 million Americans by 2060 (and tens of millions more around the world as life expectancy increases), has no cure; a new drug for the condition hasn't been approved in well over a decade; initially promising experimental treatments seem to be failing with clockwork regularity; and there's not even a definitive consensus on what, exactly, biopharma companies should focus on while developing Alzheimer's medicines.

«I would like to find a way — and I don't know what exactly that's going to be — how do we get bipartisan consensus to fix these looming, debt problems we've got on the horizon,» Ryan said.

Although there was disagreement on exactly what should be done, there appeared to be a consensus that action should be taken to avert a 2 - degree Celsius (3.6 - degree Fahrenheit) rise in average global temperatures and to cut emissions of greenhouse gases in half by 2050.

What You Need To Know: Pixar are going through a rough patch at the moment (even if we contest that «Brave» was undervalued by many, the critical consensus was that it was something of a miss), and we're not sure that their third sequel in four years is necessarily going to be the way out of it (what is the audience for a CGI animated kids flick take on «Animal House,» exactly?).

He has mentioned that there is not yet consensus on what exactly schools should be accountable for and to whom they are accountable.

While there appears to be an emerging consensus on key issues such as the need to limit what vendors can and can not do with student data, beyond purposes related to learning, what exactly any new law should look like is still somewhat cloudy.

If you are like me, and are wondering what the appeal of this controller is, and exactly why it's so popular, diving through the comments on forums, It seems to me that the general consensus as to why people are mostly down to drop the $ 39.99, is due to the retro design which resembles the sega genesis controller, the fact that it features customisable input settings and that a lot of people actually still do play 2 - D fighting games or want that specific controller feel when playing the more recently released fighting games such as Tekken or even Mortal Kombat X

Climate knowledge is growing rapidly now and while there still remain some interesting challenges to the status quo on certain points (for example, exactly how it is that CO ₂ and CH ₄ started rising some 5000 years ago, if not by human impacts, or how it is that humans overwhelmed expected gradual declines and added enough to achieve those rises that far back) that need further research... the very conservative consensus, which must be conservative by its nature since it takes time for consensus to develop as further research helps to close gaps and remove or improve assumptions, is always playing catch - up it seems.

Mr McIntyre is exactly right: If we take Big Climate at their word that the entire global economy needs massive re-orientation on a scale never before contemplated, it will require the largest societal consensus â $ «left and right and center, in America, in Canada, in Britain, in Europe... Yet all Big Climate does is retreat ever deeper into its shrinking echo chamber and compile ever longer lists of people who are beyond the pale â $ «Professor Curry, Professor Christy, Professor Bengtsson, Professor Pielke, Professor Soon, Lord Lawson, the Bishop of Chester, the winner of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics, the winner of the 1998 Nobel Prize in Physics... It might be quicker for Mann, Trenberth, Gavin Schmidt and the other climate enforcers to make a short list of those to whom they are prepared to grant a say in the future of the planet.

There has always been some degree of bipartisan consensus for protecting clean water and air, she claimed, even if there are disagreements on how exactly we should go about doing that.

In full, pseudoscientific surround stereo: ------------------------------------------ «I take a bit of issue with this comment, ATTP: >> science doesn't work via consensus I guess that depends on exactly what facet of science you're talking about (or what you mean by «work»).»

In today's post, I suggest the late Dr Stephen Schneider provided the recipe in mid 1996 on exactly how this could be done — question their associations, suggest they don't deserve fair media balance because of that, and emphasize the settled consensus about global warming.

1) Depending on exactly how you measure the expert consensus, it's somewhere between 90 % and 100 % that agree humans are responsible for climate change, with most of our studies finding 97 % consensus among publishing climate scientists.

This sort of broad policy could only work where there is a very broad consensus among those sought to be governed that it's right to go along with it — and that's exactly what you don't have here — or, alas, where there's a majority that wishes to enforce conformity on the minority and is willing to use social and other pressures to bring that about.

or even agreement on how to measure consensus, to prove that there is an attack you would need to at least agree on what Bitcoin is and what exactly was attacked.