As expected, much of the criticism of Revkin's piece illustrates how egregiously so many climate activists misjudge the current
political consensus on global warming and its policy implications.
London: Former prime minister John Howard has poured scorn on the «alarmist» scientific
consensus on global warming in a speech to a gathering of British climate sceptics, comparing those calling for action on climate change to religious zealots.
Mr Cohn eventually gets around to admitting that «In the end, the so - called scientific
consensus on global warming doesn't look like much like consensus when scientists are struggling to explain the intricacies of the earth's climate system, or uttering the word «uncertainty» with striking regularity.»
When researchers looked into how the scientific
consensus on global warming evolved from 1996 to 2009 they found a steady increase in the agreement among scientists (Bray 2010).
Even if you choose to dismiss the overwhelming
scientific consensus on global warming, there's no getting around the fact that fossil fuels are both polluting and nonrenewable and that we're better off seeking out economically feasible alternatives sooner, rather than later.
I have often heard that their is a scientific
consensus on global warming and can no longer be denied, that 97 % of...
When his turn to question Holdren arrived, Rohrabacher began by requesting permission to submit the names of 100 climate scientists who disagree with
the consensus on global warming, including people Rohrabacher described as prominent academics.
Republicans are then less likely to conform to the scientific
consensus on global warming, while Democrats are much more likely to do so.
The IPCC, the United Nations institution that compiles the scientific
consensus on global warming, has issued a series of reports since 1990 based on those models.
Fact check: Actual scientific
consensus on global warming (from real scientists that research and publish scrutinized reports) is getting stronger.
In recent years, Dr. Pachauri has been a target of some writers, scientists and research groups who challnge
the consensus on global warming or who oppose actions to make big cuts in greenhouse gases.
But, given how pathetic our response has been to scientific
consensus on global warming, I'm not holding out hope.
Your reasoning seems to be that, because a consensus * can * be wrong,
the consensus on global warming * must * be wrong and the minority view must be correct.
a Greenpeace research project highlighting the more than a decade - long campaign by Exxon - funded front groups — and the scientists they work with — to deny the urgency of the scientific
consensus on global warming and delay action to fix the problem.
There is
no consensus on global warming among scientists and as the saying goes, Opinons are like assholes, everybody has one; and most of them stink.
The world's largest energy company is still spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund European organisations that seek to cast doubt on the scientific
consensus on global warming and undermine support for legislation to curb emission of greenhouse gases.
«There's a recent paper by John Cook and co-authors who looked at thousands of research papers which have been published in the scientific literature to see what fraction support the scientific
consensus on global warming.
The charts in question are among the best known in the portfolio of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the established curators of the scientific
consensus on global warming and the UN's chief scientific advisors to climate treaty negotiators.
You can not dispute that claim so you make up a strawman that she claimed there was
a consensus on global warming.
One result is that in their efforts to provide «balanced coverage,» U.S. media have given disproportionate attention to the skeptics, creating the impression of less scientific
consensus on global warming than exists within the mainstream scientific community.
He is rather well known for claiming that «There's
no consensus on global warming.»
Because the perception of a scientific
consensus on global warming is so widespread, this has led some people to believe that any criticism of man - made global warming theory is by definition «anti-science», and part of an apparent «war on science».
Wrote the Leipzig Declaration in 1996, arguing that there was no scientific
consensus on global warming and therefore no grounds for an international agreement regulating greenhouse gas emissions.
Several climate scientists have spoken of how they have felt peer pressure to promote the idea that there is a scientific
consensus on global warming.
So, it seems to have played a substantial role in creating the perception of a scientific
consensus on global warming.
Avery also disputes the scientific
consensus on global warming, ascribing the warming to «sunspots,» purportedly based on information about ice cores and deep ocean sediment deposits.
With the IPCC increasingly in the spotlight, the denialists can trivialize the entire environmental crisis simply by casting doubt on the scientific
consensus on global warming.
Certainly there's
no consensus on global warming, they say.
All of the above is part of the emerging, solidifying scientific
consensus on global warming — a consensus that raises the urgent political and economic issue of climate change.
What is new is «
the consensus on global warming» admits that AGW True Believers simply assume global warming is manmade.
Have you read our essay called Is there a scientific
consensus on global warming?.
of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and efforts to create the illusion of scientific
consensus on global warming.
Phrases with «consensus on global warming»