This does not explain
the consensus on the denial -LRB-!)
Not exact matches
Hackers may attempt to interfere with the Purchaser's digital wallet, whether located
on the Caviar Platform or otherwise, (Purchaser's Wallet), the Caviar Smart Contract or the availability of Caviar Tokens in any number of ways, including without limitation
denial of service attacks, Sybil attacks, spoofing, smurfing, malware attacks, or
consensus - based attacks.
With the establishment of the scientific
consensus on climate change, is it reasonable and sensible to ask of government officials who remain obstructive and in
denial of such overwhelming scientific data if they are perfidiously engaged in a violation of public trust and, therefore, malfeasant in office?
DeSmog reported that the House Committee
on Science, Space and Technology hearings «have officially turned into theater to stage climate science
denial,» noting that Michael Mann was the only witness
on the committee to represent the 97 %
consensus view that humans cause climate change.
Quite frankly, the various arguments
on consensus (and
denial thereof by the pseudoskeptics) are equivalent to discussing the number of angels who can dance
on a pin, given that by any measure the scientific
consensus on AGW is as high as that
on ozone depletion by CFCs, acid rain, or the dangers of smoking tobacco, in all of which we found the
consensus sufficient to act.
Climate change
denial is a set of organized attempts to downplay, deny or dismiss the scientific
consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons.
But painting this as the «normal», opinion - based sort of
consensus is a good
denial tactic, as is highlighting the views of the very few contrarian climate scientists (who are in the same boat as the people who authored negative trials
on aspirin, if there are any - they're destined for the dustbin of science history.)
Climate change
denial is a term used to describe organized attempts to downplay, deny or dismiss the scientific
consensus on the extent of global warming, its significance, and its connection to human behavior, especially for commercial or ideological reasons.
This can also be seen in print and TV news coverage of GOP presidential candidates» climate
denial, which frequently failed to indicate that the candidates» statements about climate change conflicted with the scientific
consensus on the issue.
Denialism: The
denial of basic facts and concepts that are undisputed, well - supported parts of the scientific
consensus on a subject, in favor of radical and controversial crank theories.
Like other forms of disinformation, this
denial of the expert
consensus impinges
on the public's right to be adequately informed about the risks it is facing.
Since 1998, a total of at least $ 30.9 million has been doled out from ExxonMobil to think tanks running climate
denial campaigns, blocking policy solutions, and attacking the scientific
consensus on climate change — including $ 1.8 million last year alone.
The Heartland Institute, a think tank funded by the fossil fuel industry and infamous for backing ACD
denial, recently distributed a non-science-based report denying the scientific
consensus on ACD to elected officials.
Claims that a scientific
consensus on climate doesn't exist despite multiple studies or even cursory looks at the literature, or that expert opinions are meaningless, are really just efforts in
denial, and attempts to halt reality - driven public policies.
Attacks
on any scientific
consensus, whether it be human - caused global warming or the link between smoking and cancer, exhibit five characteristics of science
denial.
Every movement that has rejected a scientific
consensus, whether it be
on evolution, climate change or the link between smoking and cancer, exhibits the same five characteristics of science
denial (concisely summarized by the acronym FLICC).
Incontrovertible: There is NO
consensus on «climate change»: Only consistent data point: The
denial that deni... http://t.co/0v3T6Y6jmm
Incontrovertible: NO
consensus on #ClimateChange; only consistent data:
Denials that deniers exist!
Participating in the struggle against
denial of the scientific
consensus on climate is something I would dearly like to continue doing, but force majeure dictates some triage of my efforts.
In contrast to
denial of the problem's existence is the
consensus statement
on the desirability of shared parenting following parental separation for most children (Warshak, 2014).