Sentences with phrase «consensus on the human»

Pruitt is currently participating in a lawsuit against the EPA's regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and denies the overwhelming scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

«Similarly, a number of studies have found that telling people about the 97 % scientific consensus on human - caused global warming has a neutralizing rather than polarizing effect.»

The consensus on human - caused climate change is among the strongest observed in the sciences — about as strong as the consensus surrounding the link between smoking and lung cancer.

Today, many GOP legislators reject the scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

His favorable reference to «State of Fear» is a dead giveaway, as is his broad - brush scathing dismissal of the scientific consensus on human - caused climate disruption.

The details of Monckton's Apocalypse Cancelled luncheon lecture series were released late last week by tour organizer Friends of Science, the Calgary - based «astroturf» group devoted to opposing the scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

His favorable reference to «State of Fear» is a dead giveaway, as is his broad - brush scathing dismissal of the scientific consensus on human - caused climate disruption.

This independent approach produced a 97.2 per cent consensus on human - caused global warming, confirming the 97.1 per cent consensus we observed from the abstract text.

As we documented in our paper, research has also shown that when people are aware of the expert consensus on human - caused global warming, they're more likely to accept the science and support climate policy to address the problem.

Montford republished a quote in which I discussed reducing the public misperception about the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.

For example, in a recent hearing reviewing the UK 4th carbon budget, Labour Party Member of Parliament (MP) Graham Stringer said of the expert consensus on human - caused global warming,

While Naomi Oreskes first identified the consensus on human - caused global warming in the peer - reviewed literature in 2004, the first study to quantify it at 97 % came in 2009, reinforced by 97 % studies in 2010 and 2013.

The 97 % consensus on human - caused global warming is a robust result using two independent methods (volunteer abstract ratings and scientist self - ratings) and consistent with similar previous surveys.

YPCCC cited research published in Science that found that only 30 percent of middle school and 45 percent of high school science teachers understand the degree of scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

When Hulme queries the value of consensus on human - caused global warming in the peer - reviewed literature, he has it backwards in two important ways.

The IPCC report and the 97 % expert consensus on human - caused global warming are themselves not proof of anything.

quote: «Despite the 97 % expert consensus on human - caused global warming supported by peer - reviewed research, expert opinion, the IPCC reports, and National Academies of Science and other scientific organizations from around the world, a large segment of the population remains unconvinced on the issue.»

It came as no surprise to anyone working in climate research that there is an overwhelming scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.

That makes both of them authors of the less than 3 % of peer - reviewed climate science papers rejecting the consensus on human - caused global warming.

According to The Guardian, which describes the interview as «revealing,» Christy offers an innacurate response on the 97 % consensus on human - caused global warming: [12], [22]

Christy also devoted much of his written testimony denying the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.

The # 1 strategy they have pursued involves denying the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.

Perhaps the # 1 strategy they have pursued involves denying the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.

It noted that thousands of studies, including Mann's work, have «produced a growing mountain of evidence leading to the scientific consensus on human - induced global climate change.»

EJNet: The most comprehensive survey of the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming ever done reveals a 97.1 per cent consensus.

It was clearly intended by Congressman Lamar Smith, who is a climate change denier, he does not accept the overwhelming scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

President Trump, his top officials, and Republican leaders in Congress propose to dial back action on climate change, arguing that the scientific consensus on human induced - climate change is unconvincing.

Second, the consensus on human caused climate change is not as overwhelming as you seem to think.

When the science agrees with a pro-environmentalist position, like the consensus on human - caused global warming, then environmentalists happily cite the science and link arm - in - arm with scientists.

Given the importance of the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming in peoples» decisions whether to support action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the public lack of awareness of the consensus, we need to make people aware of these results.

The hockey stick graph is a high - profile example among literally thousands of pieces of evidence that have contributed to the present scientific consensus on the human influence on global warming.

Consistent with the original study, we find robust and replicated evidence that communicating the scientific consensus on human - caused climate change leads to significant and substantial changes in perceived scientific agreement among conservatives, moderates, and liberals alike.

Particularly, repeated exposure to simple messages that correctly state the actual scientific consensus on human - caused climate change is a strategy likely to help counter the concerted efforts to misinform the public.

There is currently widespread public misunderstanding about the degree of scientific consensus on human - caused climate change, both in the US as well as internationally.

Subjects were asked to provide an estimate (0 % — 100 %) of the perceived level of scientific consensus on human - caused climate change at both the beginning (pre-test) and at the end of the survey (post-test).

After being shown evidence of the consensus on human - caused global warming, Australian acceptance of this scientific reality grew across the political spectrum, but especially among conservatives.

Awareness of the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming is a key factor in peoples» decisions whether or not to support action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The slow rate reflects that there has been little room to grow, because the consensus on human - caused global warming has generally always been over 90 % since 1991.

In short, the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming is an indisputable reality, supported by many different lines of evidence, despite the strategic efforts to deny it.

Tol's critique explicitly acknowledges the expert consensus on human - caused global warming is real and accurate.

However, the good news is that the report is consistent with the 97 percent expert consensus on human - caused global warming.

97 % consensus on human - caused global warming has been disproven Cooks» 97 % consensus» disproven by a new peer reviewed paper showing major math errors (Anthony Watts)

I go into why there is a scientific consensus on human - caused global warming, explain the research in our consensus paper published in Environmental Research Letters and answer 5 criticisms of our paper.

After showing the misinformation, I asked people to estimate the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming, in order to measure any effect.

Our purpose: to raise awareness of the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.

Those who reject the consensus on human - caused global warming like to compare themselves to Galileo who challenged the Church's view that the sun revolved around the Earth.

Still, they find a strong consensus on human causation of climate change: 87.4 % of respondents are to some extent convinced that most of recent or near future climate change is, or will be, the result of anthropogenic causes (question v007).

Whether or not you agree with the 97 percent expert consensus on human - caused global warming, there is an undeniable risk that the consensus is correct and that we're causing dangerously rapid climate change.

We want our results to be transparent and replicable, so that anybody can quantify the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming for themselves.

The one thing these attacks have in common is almost all were conducted by individuals or groups who reject the scientific consensus on human - caused global warming.