Sentences with phrase «consensus picks of»

We track such hedge funds as part of our market - beating «Best Performing Hedge Funds Strategy», which invests in the consensus picks of the top 100 best performing hedge funds every quarter.

I want to legally steal the top stock recommendations and proprietary consensus picks of 200 of Wall Street's top guns through your exclusive investment advisory service, Wall Street's Best Investments.

Not exact matches

In discussing Old Testament ethics, we are not faced with the usual problem of trying to pick out a consensus from a welter of diverging viewpoints and methods.

I don't know if they ever fail to reach consensus ahead of the draft or who would make the pick if they did.

Also, the consensus at the time was that we'd pick Fultz, for whom there was no enthusiasm throughout the league (well, outside of Philadelphia, as it turns out...), and even after the offseason nobody thought we'd be a contender, let alone come out of the East this year.

Of all 30 teams, the Mets and their four excellent, young and cheap starters would be the consensus No. 1 pick in the Things Other Teams Would Steal fantasy draft.

Unfortunately, not every potential lottery pick has a player - specific prop bet so a number of later picks are based on consensus rankings from the most prominent NBA draft experts including ESPN's Chad Ford, NBADraft.net and Draft Express.

The consensus: A first - round pick and something else, which is an immense return for a player that only has one year left on his contract and a full file of problems from his early years in the league.

hurst was a projected top 3 pick at the beginning of the season and was the consensus overall pick for ’17 DPY at the end of last season.

That ranks 300 yards and 2 touchdowns ahead of Aaron Rodgers — the consensus number one overall pick.

Most casual bettors struggle with the psychology of ignoring the so - called experts and consistently picking against the consensus.

I didn't mean it so much as your article gave off that vibe, I definitely noted you mentioning several times that it isn't a massive factor for you, it's more that I was on a bit of a cycle of reading these types of articles combined with the comments to the article the consensus I picked up was the majority was on the side of «if he can't pull in a big wage his compassion and caring side count for nothing» and that just makes me feel like there's a slight double standard that exists with certain things.

Elders and key actors in the politics of northern Nigeria, on Saturday, converged on Abuja to brainstorm on strategies to be adopted to pick a consensus candidate from the region for the 2019 presidential election.

When some politicians try to sway public opinion, they employ the tricks of the debating chamber: cherry - picking data, ignoring the consensus opinions of experts, adept use of a sneer or a misplaced comparison, reliance on the power of rhetoric rather than argument.

As to which form of exercise to try first, there are not enough head - to - head comparisons to pick a winner, nor is there consensus on whether a specific form of exercise is a bad choice, per se.

Mark Lynas, a former anti-GMO activist who now considers GMO fears a «conspiracy theory,» notes that GMO opponents use the same rhetorical tactics beloved of climate deniers: cherry - picking evidence, emphasizing a few dissenting «experts» over the scientific consensus, and attempting to «capture and control the public - policy agenda to enforce its long - held prejudices.»

That consensus pick is of course, Frances McDormand.

Proceed with caution, of course: When talking great scenes, spoilers are inevitable, though we did manage to highlight our consensus pick for the best of the bunch — a grand finale, just like our number one choice last year — without giving away where it goes (though those looking to preserve the surprise should skip the clip, or any of the other sporadic few YouTube videos we included).

Although a few times in recent years the LAFCA has gone along with the year's critical consensus (picking, for instance, «The Social Network» and «The Hurt Locker»), it typically is one of the more adventurous and idiosyncratic groups.

Sure, Ethan Hawke (Boyhood) has been picking up steam recently but Josh Brolin (Inherent Vice) has lost most of his and no one else is finding any consensus support.

Two film polls of note: The L Magazine (a consensus Top 25) and The Daily Notebook at Mubi (in which each contributor picks a new and old title for a prospective double feature).

Amid a scattered range of responses, one film seemed to emerge as a consensus pick: writer - director Sean Durkin's «Martha Marcy May Marlene,» a solemn - sounding drama starring Elizabeth Olsen (younger sister of Those Twins) as a damaged young woman rebuilding her life after fleeing a religious cult.

Which film seems like the «consensus» pick, the one most voters can agree is the right work of art for this year (like 12 Years or Spotlight or Moonlight)?

In terms of the Best Acting races, fan response aligned with this year's awards season trends and consensus picks.

The consensus pick for Best Picture was Guillermo del Toro's The Shape of Water with 19 percent of the vote, followed by Christopher Nolan's Dunkirk with 17 percent and Jordan Peele's Get Out with 16 percent.

Vertigo — The consensus pick for the greatest of all Alfred Hitchcock films, a movie dangerously close to supplanting Citizen Kane from the # 1 spot in the decennial Sight And Sound poll, but I've only got it rated the fourth best film of its year.

(By the way, the consensus theory from email colleagues is that the Times is picking up the pace on education reporting in order to stay ahead of the Wall Street Journal.

Help them reach a consensus on disputed aspects of design by writing down three top picks and taking a vote.

This Houston Chronicle series, telling the story how an obscure state memo limiting special education services had innumerable effects, has already led to real - world changes and seems to be the consensus pick for education coverage of the year.

By now you've probably picked up on the general consensus that the 2018 North American International Auto Show represents something of a down year for one of the industry's annual events.

While there was a remarkable degree of consensus on our main picks, it was by no means unanimous, so we've included a few extras that some panel members felt strongly about in the «Honourable mentions» sidebar on page 50.

I haven't picked up the 6 - 8 pm block but picked up a 6 - 10 pm before so I don't have a lot of personal experience picking up the Amazon flex block, but there is a general consensus that it is an easy Amazon flex block to pick up.

On policy, the consensus among experts matters, and so does its history for those left picking up the pieces of «what went wrong».

Comparing «Big Oil» to «Big Tobacco» and climate change to smoking has been used by Michael Mann, James Hansen, Gavin Schmidt (Hansen's hand picked replacement at NASA), and John Cook (perpetrator of the fraudulent 97 % consensus «study»).

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

NASA's Gavin Schmidt even throws out a challenge: «Regardless of these spats, the fact that the community overwhelmingly supports the consensus is evidenced by picking up any copy of Journal of Climate or similar, any scientific program at the AGU or EGU meetings, or simply going to talk to scientists (not the famous ones, the ones at your local university or federal lab).

Lindzen's critics say his dissent consists of taking cynical potshots at the consensus model of global warming and that he chooses to pick his fights before general audiences who don't understand the science.

There's probably no doubt that the organization's formal position will be picked up by the warmists and touted as further evidence of their «97 % consensus» nonsense.

Several skeptical scientists picked apart the general consensus of their peers, who say humans are warming the Earth at an unprecedented pace.

In a nutshell, the consensus hypothesis that fats and cholesterol cause heart disease is a result of extreme cherry - picking and other fraudulent practices of establishment science.

Fudging and cherry - picking data to «erase» the cooling periods after 1940 and 1998 and to produce the infamous «hockey stick», publishing exceedingly biased studies to convince the public of a 97 % consensus, and revising Wikipedia articles to eliminate opposing evidence and opinions are reprehensible and repugnant actions for anyone working in science.

The time flow line issue is open to all sorts of nit picking which is never going to reduce to a «consensus».

It is intellectually dishonest to devote several pages to cherry - picking studies that disagree with the IPCC consensus on net health effects because you don't like its scientific conclusion, while then devoting several pages to hiding behind [a misstatement of] the U.N. consensus on sea level rise because you know a lot reasonable people think the U.N. wildly underestimated the upper end of the range and you want to attack Al Gore for worrying about 20 - foot sea level rise.On this blog, I have tried to be clear what I believe with my earlier three - part series: Since sea level, arctic ice, and most other climate change indicators have been changing faster than most IPCC models projected and since the IPCC neglects key amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks, the IPCC reports almost certainly underestimate future climate impacts.

Despite an overwhelming consensus among scientists that the Earth is warning at an alarming rate, critics Thursday accused the researchers of consciously cherry - picking facts to mislead the public.

If there are too many models for there to be some general consensus of what the prediction should be, then we do in fact revert to the problem of cherry picking.

Spectrum: I'm sure you don't want to speak for whoever hacked into East Anglia's e-mail, but is it a fair guess that East Anglia was picked precisely because of its key role in establishing the consensus temperature record?

NPR ran with a story the other day, picking on a particularly miffed climatologist that his paper showing snowfall in the Sierras (I believe; haven't gone back to check the story on that yet) hasn't diminished despite what he claims are the consensus predictions, hinting at dark conspiracies — and the NPR reporter went with this in spite of his own reporting in the same story that the paper was merely cumulative of others that had already pointed out the «anomoly»!

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutor - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

REM took those consensus picks and added our own and the results will be revealed on REMonline every day until the end of June.

REM took those consensus picks and added our own and the results will be revealed on REM online every day until the end of June.