This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading scientific
consensus report produced in 2008 by the Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO): «Forests and Energy, Key Issues» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading scientific
consensus report produced in 2008 by the World Health Organization (WHO): «World Malaria Report» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading scientific
consensus report produced in 2010 by The Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP):» Proceedings of the GESAMP International Workshop on micro - plastic particles as a vector in transporting persistent, bio - accumulating and toxic substances in the oceans» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of the leading scientific
consensus report produced in 2008 by the World Health Organization (WHO):» Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance in the World» Learn more...
This Digest is a faithful summary of two leading scientific
consensus reports produced in 2003 and 2004 by the World Health Organization (WHO):» Health Aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide» and» Answer to follow - up questions from CAFE (2004)» Learn more...
Not exact matches
While many other bodies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, have
produced consensus reports on climate change scenarios and impacts, Harvard's McCarthy said he hopes the
report's clarity and brevity (it is 15 pages long, not including references) will help it break through.
The Soon and Baliunas paper
produced political results in one respect: it seems to have emboldened the Bush administration to edit a June Environmental Protection Agency
report so that it no longer represented a scientific
consensus about climate change.
By 1988, the EPRI
produced a
report that concluded «there is a growing
consensus in the community that the greenhouse gas effect is real,» the EPI said.
The growing
consensus on steps needed to reform elementary science education will not
produce results without the «purposeful involvement» of the federal government, a forthcoming
report contends.
On the contrary, even as confidence in the mainstream scientific
consensus was solidified be the released of the IPPP Fourth Assessment
Report in 2007, the rightwing opponents of science were buoyed by the La Nina event of early 2008, which
produced a sharp, but temporary drop in temperatures, particularly in the Pacific.
Perhaps it is because the same procedures have been adopted by many other assessments in many other contexts; the National Academies of Science, for example,
produces consensus documents from diverse committees and panels that are subjected to expert review from selected external scholars (and it is perhaps noteworthy that NAS
reports occasionally feature signed dissents on particular points).
The hitherto unchallengeable IPCC — the body that
produces the «scientific
consensus» — has announced in the wake of criticism that the teams constructing its next
report will take «guidance» on the inclusion of non-peer-reviewed literature, the way it handles uncertainty, and its error - checking.
«The process that
produced the
report was highly political, with the Editor taking the lead in suppressing my perspectives, most egregiously demonstrated by the last - minute substitution of a new Chapter 6 for the one I had carefully led preparation of and on which I was close to reaching a final
consensus.
Starting a week tomorrow, about 40 of the 250 authors who contributed to the
report — and supposedly
produced a definitive scientific
consensus — will hold a four - day meeting in Stockholm, together with representatives of most of the 195 governments that fund the IPCC, established in 1998 by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
E-mails leaked last November cast doubt on the integrity of a few of the 4000 scientists who
produce consensus reports for the U.N. body on climate change science (Science, 4 December 2009, p. 1329).
By contrast, a clear
consensus in the literature indicates that there is a causal role for television violence in
producing aggressive behavior,22 - 26 although only 1 study27 specifically correlated television viewing with bullying behavior and this in a Swiss cross-sectional sample with self -
report of both media use and bullying.