Not exact matches
Another critical piece of information one must understand to really «
get» how hard / soft forks are created is the fact that full nodes are needed to enforce
consensus rules on the blockchain.
He will be looking for answers on how we invest in our infrastructure, how we
get the planning
rules right and how we can create
consensus across the political spectrum on some of the most difficult decisions.
Surely this is something more appropriate to
get posted under «Australian Silliness» http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/video-zebra-finch-call-prepares-their-eggs-climate-change It would also logically add to the 97 %
consensus according to the
rules of the Lewandowsky survey
They accurately perceive the deck to be stacked, and the
rules always changeable against them: a woman who sacrifices a part of her career for her children loses that part of her career, but
gets to «keep» the family; a man who does the same does not, and that inequality is becoming more commonly noticed, despite academic and elite
consensus that it would be best if that reality went not only unresolved, but unaddressed.
Before
getting into possible solutions, Lombrozo first discussed the current issues with coming to
consensus on new
rules for the Bitcoin network.
The
consensus seemed to be that the new
rules (a requirement to
get a license from the Financial Services Agency, register with the anti-money laundering authorities and submit to periodic audits and inspections) would be good for the sector.