Not exact matches
The end result of a perfect democracy is actually
consensus and not
rule of the majority or
voting.
Coming to
consensus, by the way, can be anything from the students running a quick pro / con debate, majority
rules vote, or even a rock / paper / scissors smack down.
Since the Illinois Supreme Court
ruled last fall that the law violated the «one person, one
vote» principle, members of several coalitions that support the 1988 measure have been working to reach
consensus on a new
voting plan.
That level of
consensus was not possible in this case, and the COP
rules don't enable
voting.
Up to this point, the main way to judge support for a change to Bitcoin's
consensus rules has been miner
voting.
During the interview, Todd summarized why having users
vote for changes to Bitcoin's
consensus rules would be an improvement over miner
voting:
Todd explained that the simplest implementation of user
voting would likely be a flag in Bitcoin wallets that asks users whether they support a potential change to Bitcoin's
consensus rules.