Not exact matches
Before a
single child's information is turned over to any 3rd party, policymakers should give assurance to parents and educators that no harm will come to Tennessee school children by adopting the following principles: The state and districts should be required to publish any and all existing data sharing agreements in printed and electronic form, and include a thorough explanation
of its purpose and provisions, and make it available to parents and local school authorities statewide; The Department
of Education should hold hearings throughout the state or testify before the legislature to explain any existing data agreement, and answer questions from the public or their representatives, obtain informed comment, and gauge public reaction; All parents should have the right to be notified
of the impending disclosure
of their children's data, and provide them with a right to
consent or have the right to withhold their children's information from being shared; The state should have to define what rights families or
individuals will have to obtain relief if harmed by improper use or release
of their child's private information, including how claims can be made; and finally, any legislation must ensure that the privacy interest
of public school children and their families are put above the interests
of any 3rd Party and its agents and subsidiaries.
Within a
single consent document, the
consent for use and disclosure
of protected health information required or permitted under this rule must be visually and organizationally separate from the other
consents or authorizations and must be separately signed by the
individual and dated.
Under § 164.506 (b)(4),
consents for uses and disclosures
of protected health information to carry out treatment, payment, and health care operations may be combined in a
single document covering all three types
of activities and may be combined with other types
of legal permission from the
individual.
73 DOS 95 Matter
of DOS v. Marotta - consolidation
of actions; dual agency; disgorgement
of broker commission; broker may act concurrently in a
single transaction as an agent and a principal with informed
consent of and full disclosure to principal; broker's agreement breached by broker where broker obtained property incompatible with client's stated needs; no broker's fee earned where brokerage agreement breached by broker; broker engaging in business under trade name acts as
individual; agency created between broker and buyer by conduct
of parties; dual agency allowed upon full disclosure and informed
consent of both buyer and seller; no commission earned by broker where breach
of fiduciary duty; refund unearned commissions