The consequences for law students and future law students are potentially profound.
Not exact matches
Many states have set the bar so low
for children who are learning English that
students in those states could leave high school without being taught to read or write the language, yet their schools would face no
consequences under federal education
law.
In August 2016, the National Consumer
Law Center (NCLC)-- supported by nearly 40 other public interest groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)-- sent a letter to Education Secretary John King demanding the department track and remedy the disproportionate
consequences of
student loan debt
for borrowers of color.
The accountability system, policy experts argue, is largely responsible
for the
law's most negative
consequence: Allowing states to «dummy down» their academic standards so that more
students could be classified as proficient each year.
This new
law will provide a measure of protection
for our teachers, districts and
students from
consequences for student test scores on a standardized test whose validity and reliability as a tool
for measuring their performance is not supported by data.
The federal
law requires states to administer high - stakes tests with
consequences for inadequate
student performance.
WHEREAS, the new evaluation system based on NYS Education
Law 3012c disproportionately weights the use of high stakes test scores over qualitative assessments as «Measures of
Student Learning (MOSL)» in determining teacher performance, leading to a proliferation of Common Core - aligned tests with devastating
consequences for teaching and learning conditions in our schools, and
During the 84th Legislative Session in 2015, the legislature passed a
law with the unintended
consequence of reducing the funding
for public charter schools with unique programs, often serving vulnerable
student populations.
«The Rule of
Law for Citizenship Education: International
Law and Human Rights» introduces
students to the international legal order with powerful examples of the deprivation and
consequences of deprivation of rights across the world.
In recent years with new state and national education
laws (e.g. No Child Left Behind),
students» scores on standardized tests can also have
consequences for individual teachers (their evaluation is partially based on their
students» test scores) and
for schools (
for example, potentially closing schools with a certain percentage of failing
students).
Most importantly, as schools work to improve attendance
for ESSA accountability, state education leaders must continually scrutinize state
laws and school district policies and practices regarding attendance to be sure that they do not have unintended negative
consequences for students with disabilities.
Since then, demand
for these limited - edition bobbleheads has grown so fervent that one
law professor has written a scholarly article on the federal income tax consequences of the phenomenon, and students at George Mason University School of Law have set up a bobblehead redemption cent
law professor has written a scholarly article on the federal income tax
consequences of the phenomenon, and
students at George Mason University School of
Law have set up a bobblehead redemption cent
Law have set up a bobblehead redemption center.
Posts cover the rising costs of legal education and the
consequences of that, run letters from
law school graduates and former
law students with tales of woe, and address how much
law professors who do (or don't do) what their job asks of them are responsible
for law graduates» unsatisfactory outcomes.
I would argue that the principal factor causing the most dire problem is not the lack of utility of a
law degree, the tuition of the
law school and the debt it created or even the competitiveness of the job market
for lawyers upon graduation, but the four years that the
student was required to spend learning something unnecessary to obtain an undergraduate degree that is utterly useless to the practice of
law and that delays the entry to a competitive job market to a point in a person's life where the
consequences of unemployment or underemployment can not be borne socially or financially.