That's the threshold that the scientific consensus says we must not exceed if we're to avoid the grimmer
consequences of a warming planet.
In California, local grassroots groups have been successful in pushing polluters to clean up their communities and compelling government agencies to protect residents from
the consequences of a warming planet.
At best, it will cut emissions by about half as much as is necessary to stave off the most devastating
consequences of a warming planet.
Sea level rise is the least worrisome of the negative
consequences of a warming planet.
Although ongoing efforts to reduce carbon emissions could mitigate even worse catastrophe, momentum has shifted in part to preparing for the inevitable
consequences of a warmer planet.»
This is the only so - far - ultimate
consequence of warming the planet and the oceans.
There are negative
consequences of a warmer planet, and there are positive effects as well.
Not exact matches
Because our knowledge
of the many delicate balances in the ecology
of the
planet is still in its infancy, and because what is known is not widely understood, the
consequences of what the human race is (in its ignorance) doing to the earth may turn out to be even more serious than global
warming.
In climate science, for example, where we don't need an elaborate climate model to understand the basic physics and chemistry
of greenhouse gases, so at some level the fact that increased CO2
warms the
planet is a
consequence of very basic physics and chemistry.
As extreme weather events likely connected to the
planet's
warming climate become increasingly common, low - income communities are positioned to suffer the worst
consequences during the aftermath
of natural disasters, write the authors
of a report from the Center for American Progress called «One Storm Shy
of Despair.»
A complete failure
of the agreement at this point, with business - as - usual growth for another decade, would almost certainly commit the
planet to significantly more
warming than the Paris goals, and the human
consequences of this would be catastrophic.
The
planet is getting
warmer, ocean temperatures are rising, the polar ice caps are melting, and all
of the incontrovertible science
of climate change is that more extreme - weather events are an inevitable
consequence.
The steady rise
of Earth's temperature as greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere and trap more and more heat is sending the
planet spiraling closer to the point where
warming's catastrophic
consequences may be all but assured.
As the
planet warms, scientists have observed a radical disruption in the geographic distribution
of thousands
of animals and plants, which has unknown
consequences for species survival.
Gilles Langourieux, CEO
of Virtuos, said: «We wanted to deliver a game that provokes greater social awareness around the threats and
consequences of global
warming to our
planet if we don't change fast enough.
If the
planet's climate were changing solely because that's what
planets do, evolve through different climatic periods
of warming and cooling over millions
of years, adverse
consequences like the loss
of coral reefs and the potential for disappearing Polar Bears would still be undeniably sad, but at least a little easier to swallow.
Never before has it been possible for people from all over the world to access the latest information and collectively seek solutions to the challenges which face our
planet, and not a moment too soon: the year 2015 was the hottest in human history, and the Great Barrier Reef is suffering the
consequences of warming oceans right now.
Coal that's mined from federal lands is burned in coal - fired power plants; coal - fired power plants emit carbon pollution; and carbon pollution
warms our
planet and contributes to increasingly destructive weather events and other
consequences of climate disruption (2).
Gore's call to «make peace with the
planet» requires an integrated awareness and action against both global
warming and global warring, simultaneously — Gore describes the problem as huge, but in limiting it to civilian activities, not including military madness and mayhem, it is not huge enough — if a patient has both diabetes and severe trauma, both conditions must be treated now — militization trumps civilization in the headlines
of today and tomorrow — if the truth is that both global
warming everywhere and global warring anywhere are linked in the human biosphere, and if that truth is inconvenient to Mr Gore and the civilian scope
of his campaign against global
warming, lethal
consequences for both humans and other species will continue — in cinematic terms, the great «An Inconvenient Truth» must be blended and coordinated with the great «Why We Fight»
Because the Arctic is
warming twice as fast as the rest
of the
planet, with grave
consequences for local biodiversity and cultures, and for low - lying communities around the world at risk from climate change.
Although the countries
of Africa have some
of the lowest overall and per capita global
warming emissions on the
planet, they are also likely to suffer from some
of the worst
consequences of climate change.
Roger disputed that carbon (as CO2) caused any
warming, that honest, unaltered science thought CO2 to be the
consequence rather than the driver
of temperature increases, that increasing CO2 in the air was sourced by natural phenomena rather than mostly man - made, and that to decrease CO2 to levels required by regulation would start to starve plants, making more folks on the
planet to starve accordingly.
To me all the witnesses and senators are obviously persons
of consequence but I don't think your excerpt shows that anyone should think he takes issue with this statement — «No one questions that surface temperatures have increased overall since 1880, or that humans are adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, or that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have a
warming effect on the
planet.»
What is particularly galling to me is when my colleagues predict all sorts
of adverse health
consequences from a small amount
of warming and greening
of the
planet, when the reverse is far more likely, and when health and life expectancy always rise hand - in - hand with the deployment
of reliable, affordable fossil fuel energy.
These several billion individuals, who IPCC officials confirmed are currently operating in 195 countries worldwide, are together responsible for what experts called the «lion's share»
of the devastating
consequences of global
warming affecting the entire
planet.
A documentary
of people living with the
consequences of global
warming as well as scientists» new approaches to mitigating climate change and adapting to an evolving
planet.
While it is widely recognized that continued emission
of greenhouse gases will cause further
warming of the
planet and this
warming could lead to damaging economic and social
consequences, the exact timing and severity
of physical effects are difficult to estimate.
Now, you've got your Apple - lovers (aka: warmists or hysterics) who seek to discern the «signal»
of combustion's
consequence in
warming a
planet between 2 / 3rds & 3 / 4ths covered by oceans whose mixed layer is some ten times as massive as its air.
CAN the countries
of the Caribbean Community and Common Market (Caricom) take international legal action against the states that are
warming the
planet with devastating
consequences, not only for their survival, but in some cases even their existence?
(4) In
consequence, it may well be that the
planet has
warmed over the 20th century, and maybe one day we will be able to say so with confidence from new data and new methodologies (WRT proxies,
of course).
There is not even a shred
of credible evidence that any
warming we have experienced or will experience will, on the scale
of things, have adverse
consequences for human life on the
planet.
With
consequences of global
warming on our
planet already changing our weather systems, predictions suggest our output
of CO2 into the atmosphere will not peak until...
A natural
consequence of science is that over time, as evidence accumulates and points in a certain direction, is that the experts start agreeing on the most likely explanation (eg that smoking increases the risk
of cancer; that GHG emissions will cause a positive energy imbalance
of the
planet which will
warm up as a result).
The report, The Human Cost
of Weather - Related Disasters 1995 - 2015, is intended to focus attention during the UN climate change conference — which opens in Paris on Monday − on the damage already inflicted by global
warming as a
consequence of rising levels
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, in turn as a
consequence of the human combustion
of fossil fuels and the destruction
of the
planet's forests.
Climate scientists know that the
planet is
warming, and dangerously, as a
consequence of ever higher carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere thanks to changes humans have made to the
planet's atmospheric chemistry — and they know it can get worse.
Release URL BRIDGETOWN, Barbados, Thursday January 2, 2014 By Sir Ronald Sanders Can the countries
of the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) take international legal action against the States that are
warming the
planet with devastating
consequences not only for their survival, but in some cases even their existence?
We know that the
consequences of unchecked global
warming would be catastrophic... We as a human species have a deep and abiding obligation to this
planet and to the generations that will come after us.
There are people who would rather drastically manipulate the Earth's environment with technology without understanding the
consequences instead
of investing first in doing the heavy lifting that would be necessary by humans to reduce the
warming of the
planet.
In light
of the
consequences that runaway global
warming poses to human civilization and life in all forms on the
planet, this is unconscionable.
Climate models predict that as a
consequence of anthropogenic global
warming, the
planet should
warm more at night than during the day.
The fight has evolved from clashing over human actions and whether they are
warming the
planet to portraying the
consequences of warming as harmful, insignificant or even beneficial.
And it's downright deceitful to focus on this minucia while ignoring the bigger picture
of a
warming globe and increasingly stressful extreme weather events that will continue inflicting greater damage on a complex society that seems to be committed to ignoring the
consequences of increasing our
planet's atmosphere's insulating medium (GHGs) by a third.
It comes down to this: We know the human burning
of fossil fuel is very rapidly
warming the
planet, and we know that the longer we wait, the harsher the
consequences and the more costly it is to prevent them.
Only recently has the general public come to realize the grave
consequences that a
warmer planet would have and that climate change is truly one
of the greatest challenges we have ever faced.
De Witt, are you saying «THS???» because you don't know it stands for tropical hot spot [which I can't believe] or because you don't get the connection between backradiation and a THS, which I understood to be the case because the Troposphere would
warm faster than the surface since it is being heated by a
warmer surface, to wit, the surface
of the
planet which is getting
warmed by the aforesaid backradiation; and in addition to but not withstanding that the troposphere whould also rise which would be another aspect
of the THS, with the final characteristic being that said THS would occur in the tropics where the
warming effect
of extra water would be most pronounced, also as a
consequence of backradiation?
These cloud changes are,
of course, hardly without
consequence — the growth
of so - called dry zones or drylands, as the
planet warms, has been long predicted and indeed, observed by climate scientists.
The
consequences of the
warming can not be accurately predicted but it is generally acknowledged that the
warming will result in significant changes to the
planet with serious
consequences for mankind.