Sentences with phrase «consequences of misconduct»

A supervisor is required to intervene to prevent avoidable consequences of misconduct if the supervisor knows that the misconduct occurred.

Not exact matches

Consequences of these reforms: increased length of employment required to qualify for EI, reduced duration of benefits as well as the amount of paid benefits and the complete exclusion from the program of people who resign or are dismissed for misconduct (see table 1).

Still thinking of discipline in terms of child care, it becomes apparent, however, that the best prevention is education whenever it can be achieved that is, that the child who can learn to anticipate consequences for himself is in a much better position to avoid harmful misconduct than the child who relies wholly on external admonitions.

I've never before heard the consequences of sexual misconduct charges described as a «season of reflection.»

Getting these issues wrong can lead to consequences ranging from poor communication to disputes with mentors and colleagues and, beyond that, to accusations of research misconduct and legal trouble.

Letter of warning is a written communication that informs the Postdoctoral Scholar of the nature of the inadequate performance or misconduct; the requirements for continuation in the training program; and the probable consequence of continued inadequate performance or misconduct.

C.K. joins the ranks of more than two dozen media and entertainment power players who have faced consequences for sexual harassment and misconduct following last month's downfall of producer Harvey Weinstein.

The idea is to get kids to think about the underlying causes of their behavior, and to impose consequences for misconduct that allow students to remain in school while prompting them to change their ways.

As you note, a simple perusal of the ORI website will clearly show the consequences of research misconduct findings.

Donald Trump has had many allegations of scandal and sexual misconduct made against him and has made it through them with little consequence.

Legislation, jurisprudence and the practice of family law have evolved over the last decades in an attempt to eradicate allegations of marital misconduct unrelated to financial consequences.

Rather, spousal support entitlement generally arises as a consequence of the marriage and its breakdown, and (as I have discussed in many prior Blogs is calculated based on numerous factors, but misconduct is not one of them.

Summary dismissal for gross misconduct is such a serious consequence for a person, both immediately and in terms of future job prospects, that it is a decision that can not and should not be taken lightly.

But if you need to be convinced, consider that failing to notify your liability insurer of a potential claim could have consequences beyond potential coverage issues under the policy, including the possibility that you could be found guilty of professional misconduct.

When an allegation of professional misconduct arises the person must answer before a tribunal to determine what consequences, if any, are to flow from the offence.

Put simply, in McKinley the Supreme Court of Canada recognized the serious consequences of a dismissal for just cause and held that a summary dismissal will only be upheld by a court if the employee has committed a serious act (s) of misconduct.

In determining the seriousness of the misconduct, the Court must consider the consequences of the wrongful act or omission.

Under Georgia law, punitive damages may only be awarded in a tort action if «it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's actions showed willful misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness, oppression, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of conscious indifference to consequences.»

Moreover, where the consequences of failing to properly investigate allegations of employee misconduct are becoming so large, including the possibility of damages being awarded against employers, employers may no longer be able to afford not to retain a lawyer.

A warning letter is an elaborative document containing text about the breach of HR policy, details of misconduct, and consequences.

In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.