Brands ignores it, though at one point he does announce the difference between «the genuine
conservatism of small government and the pseudo-conservatism of «family values.»»
Not exact matches
(For all the fights the 2012 budget sought to pick with the Yankees and the environmentalists, there were a lot
of hangdog expressions at Hy's that night among Conservatives who had hoped for real
small -
government conservatism from a majority
government and thought Flaherty had delivered thin gruel.)
Among these many principles is the issue
of fiscal
conservatism - the belief in lower taxes and
smaller government.
So it might be the case that the most promising approach to training is one that relies on the basics
of conservatism: Concede our inability to perfectly foresee what's around the corner; avoid centralization; don't assume the
government will have all
of the answers; and rely on a vast array
of small - scale, nimble, local solutions crafted by civil - society actors.
The idea
of smaller government, stronger civil society, and a robust environment for free markets has been at the heart
of modern
conservatism since the days
of Russell Kirk.
I tend to believe in many
of the bedrock foundations
of fiscal
conservatism such as a balanced budget, the responsibility
of the individual, and
small governments.