Old - time liberals dismissed him along with Barth as being biblicistic and pessimistic, and fundamentalists rejected his alleged neo-orthodoxy as a «new modernism» (so Cornelius Van Til of Westminster Seminary) Even so, self - confessed liberal Wilhelm Pauck and leading
conservative evangelical theologian Carl F. H. Henry found much that was challenging and admirable in Brunner's theology.
Not exact matches
«But in the past several years, a new current has arisen in
conservative evangelical thought: A small but significant number of
theologians, psychologists, and other
conservative Christians are beginning to develop moral arguments that it's possible to affirm same - sex relationships not in spite of orthodox theology, but within it.
Fuller
theologian Jack Rogers, for example, reports in Confessions of a
Conservative Evangelical (Westminster, 1974) the shattering of his inherited view that his «orthodox theology» stood in «unbroken continuity with the theology of Warfield, the Westminster Confession, Calvin, Augustine, and Paul.»
Are all
evangelical theologians conservative?
Liberal
theologians,
evangelical revivalists, and Princeton
conservatives were all fundamentally dualistic in their thinking about human nature.
Those who interact with
evangelical theologians will not encounter simply a
conservative, theological monolith based in philosophical rationalism.
Greg Downes, our
theologian in residence, unpacks the traditional,
conservative,
evangelical stance and I have interviewed others.
Five
theologians, ranging from
conservative evangelical to radical, present their views, criticize one another, and then defend themselves against the criticism.