Not exact matches
Mr. Viersen is the former treasurer of the Barrhead / Neerlandia local of the Association for Reformed
Political Action, a social
conservative Christian organization that has spoken against Gay - Straight Alliance legislation for Alberta schools and questioned the existence of human - influenced
climate change.
She cites a study which analyzes survey data revealing that, since the mid-1970s, a falling percentage of college - educated
conservatives claim to «trust science,» compared to relatively stable numbers among liberals, and argues that those who oppose contraception, question the Neo-Darwinist narrative of evolution, or disagree with certain
political measures to address global
climate change, are opposed to science in general....
Indeed there is no doubt that the future direction of the European Union will have a major impact on the
political landscape of the UK: Completion of the single market, enlargement,
climate change and security are some of the salient challenges which Member States will confront over the coming years and we as British
Conservatives should be at the forefront of those advocating sensible and workable solutions.
«The time for petty point - scoring on
climate change, from any
political party, is surely past,» the
Conservative MP said.
So both right - wing and independent voices also think this is a potentially significant
political issue, as This Independent piece shows, However, the main post showing the scale of
climate scepticism was primarily about the disagreement between
Conservatives, noting the frontbench's support.
But, in the current
political climate, it seems to me perfectly conceivable that the
Conservatives could push Labour into third place.
I am also confident that any attempt to compile the
political associations of prominent, self - proclaimed
climate change deniers would find that they are overwhelmingly associated with
conservative and not liberal
political groups.
The
Conservative peer and former party co-chair told the Guardian she was deeply worried about the current
political climate, claiming a surge in «respectable racism» was feeding the far right.
Joe Pinion, 34, is African - American, founder of the
Conservative Color Coalition, a spokesman for
climate change advocacy group RepublicEn, and a prominent
political commentator on CNN, MSNBC and Fox News Radio.
An expensive
political football Critics of throwing billions of dollars at the technology, including Australia's Green Party and some
conservative coalition members, argue it will be developed too late to address
climate change and is too expensive.
The jump accounts for the single biggest change among all voting groups, and it could symbolize a softening among
conservatives on an issue that has sharply divided the
political parties, according to Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Program on
Climate Change Communication.
It appears that the announcement could reinforce the idea that Obama's
climate policies produce
political discomfort for Democrats in
conservative states.
Political conservatives become more open to environmentalism after seeing
climate change messages rooted in nostalgia, found a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.
Andrew Hoffman and Jenna White at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, recently argued this, saying it would create «
political cover for emerging Republicans to upend the notion that you can't be a
conservative and believe in
climate change».
He says that's a lesson from his work on
climate change doubters, whose real driver often isn't their beliefs about the role of carbon dioxide but rather their
conservative political views.
«Atmospheric CO2 is not a pollutant, it is in fact the very elixir of life,» CO2 Coalition adviser Craig Idso says of the
climate change debate at the
Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC.
Ann Hart Coulter (/ ˈ k oʊ l t ər /; born December 8, 1961) is an American
conservative social and
political commentator, writer, syndicated columnist Tom Harris is executive director of the Ottawa - based International
Climate Science Coalition, which challenges the hypothesis that carbon dioxide emissions
Layering his story with grim warnings about the horrors of
climate change and the co-opting of Christianity by the
conservative right, Schrader's movie begins in quiet introspection and ends with a crescendo of
political rage.
This shift in orientation occurred for diverse reasons, including growing public concern about the level of violence and disorder in public schools, the changed
political climate following the end of the Vietnam era, and a pattern of increasingly
conservative judicial appointments during the Nixon, Reagan, and Bush administrations.
However, with an increase in school violence and gang - related activities, the
political climate seems to have turned more
conservative, and the Supreme Court has begun to return many decisions back to the discretion of the local school board.
In an essay entitled The Clinton Crew: Privileged White Art, Ho tries to articulate how the social and
political climate of the late 90's produced such a relatively
conservative group of artists interested in autonomous, formal artistic practices, while being fundamentally decent people.
This tribal theory applies to peoples
political affiliations such as liberal or
conservative, or membership of other social groups, and we know liberals do tend to accept
climate science more than
conservatives from polls by Pew Research etc, although its not black and white.
Rev. Cizik is a card - carrying evangelical,
conservative, Republican, Christian
political activist who now gets the urgency of
climate change.
I had a bit of an «a-ha» moment reading this paper by the excellent Australian
political scientist Clive Hamilton, in which he argues that a great many American
conservatives have come to see
climate science as a threat to their core ideological identity.
Every
political group uses spin to try to persuade the public, but some of the groups that represent
conservatives and industry use what can be called extreme tactics in the
climate change science debate.
I have lost count of the number of
climate sceptics, or in your case a renewable energy sceptic, and eventually it turns out they have some sort of ideological or
political motive, usually
conservative leaning.
This Twitter item leads to a Grist /
Climate Desk piece on «
Political ideology affects energy - efficiency attitudes and choices,» a fascinating new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that, in part using light bulb choices, shows how polarization over the merits of cutting greenhouse gas emissions appears to torque the behavior of
conservatives away from commonsense energy choices.
Political scholar Steven F. Hayward recently presented in Issues the
conservative position on global warming and
climate change, including a look at measures that
conservatives might accept as part of any action plan.
Arguments that unilateral action by the United States produces little
climate benefit, that a carbon tax will expand the size of government, that a carbon tax is a regressive, that adaptation and geo - engineering is preferable to emissions constraint, that economists can not confidently design a carbon tax that does more good than harm, that the legislative process can not deliver a carbon tax worth embracing, and that promoting a carbon tax puts
conservatives on a slippery
political slope are explored and found wanting.
In Issues, a scholar of
conservative policy has looked at areas where action on
climate measures might win favor, while an energy analyst has proposed combining
climate policies drawn from across the
political spectrum.
In comparison to these factors and trends shaping wider public opinion, past research suggests that the influence of
conservative media / commentators and Climategate on wider public opinion is likely to be limited, reinforcing the views of the 20 % or less of the public already strongly dismissive of
climate change and holding a strong
conservative political identity.
As this narrative goes, right - wing politicians and their fellow travelers among the ranks of denialist
political conservatives are conspiring with the oil companies to keep America from playing its proper role in the worldwide fight against
climate change.
Clearly, many supposedly
conservative or skeptical groups not only fail to challenge the alarmist view of
climate change, they even endorse significant parts of alarmism and often go so far as to support the very
political actions that Brulle most greatly desires.
The
political divide occurs because
conservatives fear that liberals will use the
climate issue to increase taxes and government intrusion.
If you were already part of a cultural group predisposed to distrust
climate science — e.g., a
political conservative or «hierarchical - individualist» — then more science knowledge and more skill in mathematical reasoning tended to make you even more dismissive.
What I find very odd is that the «precautionary principle», an extremely
conservative philosophy, is heralded as the cornerstone of human /
climate interactions, but is never extended to the social / economic /
political system.
The
climate change disinformation campaign can be understood to be a continuation of the counter-movements that arose among US
political conservatives in reaction to the environmental, civil rights, women's rights, and anti-war movements that arose in the 1960's in the United States.
Accordingly, they tell the story backwards, from the present: environmentalism is at odds with
conservative thinking; that Thatcher proposed «there is no such thing as society» and invented individualism; that such individualism is apart from, and opposed to global
political environmentalism rather than essential to its thinking; and that
climate change politics began in Magdalen College in 1978.
Thank you Wagathon, for reminding everyone on
Climate Etc of a wise and foresighted
conservative statesman, who rejected willful ignorance and ideology - first
political dogma, and who possessed the courage to deal wisely with inconvenient scientific truths!
Data correlating «ordinary science intelligence» (as measured by a standard nine - question test),
political ideology, and tendency to agree with the statement «there is «solid evidence» of recent global warming due «mostly» to «human activity such as burning fossil fuels»» suggests that
conservative Republicans become less likely to agree with the scientific consensus on
climate change the more educated they are.
Though the science of
climate change is clear, certain American
conservatives deny the validity of the science and describe its conclusions as a
political scam, a confusion of science and politics which could prove very dangerous... No American would deny the science of ballistics, but some deny
climate science.
ClimateDepot.com is the website of Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow employee Marc Morano, a
conservative global warming denier who previously served as environmental communications director for a vocal
political denier of
climate change, Republican Sen. James Inhofe.
Both Romm and advocacy organizations such as Media Matters for America raise their financial support and define their professional roles as watch dogging the mainstream media, asserting that consistent false balance in mainstream coverage at leading outlets such as the NY Times or the Washington Post remains a major barrier to
political action on
climate change and that
conservative media like Fox News have a powerful impact on wider public opinion.
So, they came up with the idea that even though
conservatives were science savvy, they couldn't shake their
political world - view and admit the warmist
climate scientists were right.
On Friday he's slated to be on a panel to talk about «The Right
Climate Stuff» at the
Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
Mr Gore has been accused of exaggerating
climate - change risks for his own
political gain and
conservative critics have claimed scientific research is skewed to play on the fears of the public.
Here's another recent example — Pielke and his fellow
conservative contrarian colleague Dan Sarewitz had an article in the Financial Times recently («
Climate policy robs the world's poor of their hopes») that I think misses the mark so badly, in a let's - be-provocative-and-act-like-we're - the - real - progressives way, that it would be tempting to ignore it, except that it's in a high - profile publication and feeds misleading talking points to a right - wing corporate
political and economic culture.
«This successful anti-science campaign has targeted Republican elites across all levels of government, eroding belief in
climate change among
conservatives in the public and in office,» Leah Stokes, a
political scientist the University of California, Santa Barbara, told Earther in an email.
Roughly seven - in - ten self - identifying
political liberals (68 %) consider
climate change a very serious problem, while just 30 % of
conservatives say the same.
If
political conservatives have so far not found environmental policies to their liking, then a priority for everyone who cares about
climate change, whatever their
political leaning, is to find a way of reconciling the values of the right with policy responses to
climate change that are sustainable and just.