I am referring to the appearance of Marxism and the subsequent polarization of the world between the revolutionary impulse and
the conservative reaction against it.
Not exact matches
I think you're exactly right about being
reactions against the other and I often find that when some people's world is upset, they become even more
conservative in their thinking; reaching back to the old seemingly for comfort.
Both of the major camps of social
conservative reaction to the challenges of the last few years are right in part: We have always had to struggle
against the inclination of our liberal society to furiously pound itself into what Edmund Burke called «the dust and powder of individuality,» and to resist its elevation of choice above commitment.
The usual assertions are (1) that this kind of religion is today on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing of «
conservative churches» (although the alleged liberal enervation is also seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and
conservative churches is itself the result of widespread
reaction against «secular humanist» values and
against those who hold such values; (4) that our society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in moral consensus, a loss of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind of benchmark — as a time before the fall.
Missing also will be any mention of the fact that Falwell and other
conservative evangelicals fought tooth and nail
against the 1978 ruling that stripped tax - exempt status from all - white private schools formed in
reaction to integration, calling it a violation of their religious freedom.
Most attacks on Blue Labour are similar to Bragg's: a knee - jerk
reaction, and prejudice
against anything
conservative.