A topic of major contention between liberals and
conservatives education policy debates today revolves around the idea of teacher tenure and whether it is helping or hindering education reform.
Conservative education policy believes market competition holds the key to improvement.
Michael J. Petrilli, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute,
a conservative education policy research group, said the United States has a tradition of local control over education, «and as long as that's the case there's going to be disparities.»
Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader and deputy prime minister, attacked
Conservative education policy for an obsession with a «tiny handful» of free schools at the expense of «how you properly finance 24,000 schools across the whole school system».
Even the president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute,
a conservative education policy think tank that advocates school - choice, said of the amendment, «This provision will help a relative handful of affluent families who are already choosing private schools.
David Laws, a Liberal Democrat and schools minister, has previously spoken of his party's record in blocking
Conservative education policies.
But one of the inspirations for
his conservative education policy views might surprise some people: It's Milton Friedman, the legendary free market economist, whose libertarian politics also included a decidedly anti-federal government, pro-school choice world view on education policy that has guided Cruz through his political career.
The report identifies several managers and their spouses who are tied to the charter network, several of whom presumably champion school choice and other
conservative education policies on the Trump administration's policy agenda (Hedge Clippers, 2015).
Not exact matches
Posted by Nick Falvo under Alberta, BC, budgets, Canada, child benefits, Child Care,
Conservative government, demographics,
education, election 2015, employment, Harper, housing, income, income distribution, income support, income tax, inequality, PEF, population aging, post-secondary
education, poverty, privatization, progressive economic strategies, public services, Role of government, Saskatchewan, seniors, social
policy, taxation, unemployment, user fees, workplace benefits.
Posted by Nick Falvo under child benefits,
Conservative government, corporate income tax, early learning, economic crisis,
education, fiscal federalism, fiscal
policy, housing, income support, income tax, Indigenous people, inequality, minimum wage, Ontario, poverty, progressive economic strategies, recession, social indicators, social
policy, taxation, unemployment.
Posted by Nick Falvo under BC, competition,
Conservative government, corporate income tax, debt, demographics,
education, fiscal federalism, fiscal
policy, household debt, income distribution, income tax, inequality, macroeconomics, Newfoundland and Labrador, P3s, part time work, post-secondary
education, privatization, productivity, public infrastructure, Quebec, rankings, regulation, Role of government, social
policy, student debt, student movement, taxation, user fees, working time, young workers.
Fortunately for the GOP, Christian
conservatives do not believe in
education and just are not intelligent enough to realize that the GOP is only using them to gain power so that they can implement
policies that benefit the Top 5 % at the exclusion of the rest of America, Christian
conservatives included.
But if that is the case, why are there so few public statements, with the «
conservative» label attached to them, that tell us exactly what
policy should be in the matter of
education, welfare provision, environmental protection, planning law, urbanization, infrastructure, and everything else that matters to the ordinary citizen?
The
education secretary put a brave face on the announcement but it is one of the most significant U-turns in the coalition's already lengthy history of them and suggests a new fault - line between the Liberal Democrats and the
Conservatives on
education policy.
The third - ranked
policy to maintain free
education is backed by all the major parties except the
Conservatives.
The NASUWT, the largest teachers» union in the UK, has launched an advertising campaign aimed at parents and the public, highlighting the impact of the
Conservative - driven Government
education policy on children and young people.
Clegg's comments — seen by many as a hint that he might even work with the Tories rather than Labour in the event of a hung parliament — came as the
Conservatives outlined their flagship
education policy.
Lib Dem delegates are expected to offload their frustrations over a series of coalition
policies that they feel are being driven too much by
Conservative dogma, including those on
education and NHS reform.
Greening was no enthusiast for the prime minister's push to expand the number of grammar schools and it is widely reported that the
Conservatives are anxious to refresh their
education policies.
Clegg has released a video to get across his message that we can't trust the Tories on Europe, but the
Conservatives are trustworthy enough for the two parties to work closely on broader economic strategy, social and welfare reforms,
education policy, and crime.
Conservatives and tea party supporters accuse the federal government of intruding into state
education policy with the Common Core, which was originally adopted by 45 states.
«Henry Dimbleby, who proposed the idea... said that Michael Gove, the Tory
Education Secretary, is «passionate» about the plan... Some
Conservatives have already sought to take ownership of the
policy.
«When it comes to the best
education policies we should look at the evidence and we've got some very good evidence close to home: look at the transformation of schools in London,» the
Conservative peer continued.
Labour claimed the
Conservatives»
education policy was in chaos amid a grassroots revolt and the threat of a shadow Cabinet split.
«Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats are delusional if they think this announcement can airbrush out the key role they have played in betraying our children and young people by colluding with the
Conservatives in the introduction of
education policies which have robbed our children and young people of these important entitlements.
Commenting on Prime Minister Teresa May's speech to the
Conservative Party Conference today, Chris Keates, General Secretary of the NASUWT, the largest teachers» union in the UK, said: «We welcome the fact that the Prime Minister clearly recognises that the
education, social and economic
policies of her predecessor have led to inequality across
education and other public services.
He is Chief Whip for the
Conservative Group and speaks on
Education policy in Wales.
Above all, the
Conservatives have a progressive trump card in the shape of their
education policy, which could smash the middle - class opportunity hoarding made possible by high house prices in the catchment areas of the best schools.
Spencer Pitfield on Comment: Immigration and
education on the
Conservative Policy Forum's agenda
«Spencer Pitfield: Immigration and
education on the
Conservative Policy Forum's agenda Main Robert Buckland MP: The Justice and Security Bill strikes the correct balance between openness and the need to preserve our national security»
The new shadow
education secretary Tristram Hunt earlier signalled that the Labour party had dropped its opposition to the
Conservatives» free schools
policy.
For years, the Republican «Long Island Nine» in the State Senate stayed out of the way when Cuomo looked to pass liberal social
policies like gay marriage and gun control, and supported his fiscally
conservative agenda on taxes,
education, public sector unions and regulation.
She spoke for over an hour, through a combination of prepared remarks, a question - and - answer period with audience members and a sit - down conversation with Frederick Hess, director of
education policy studies for the
conservative think tank.
Shadow
education secretary Tristram Hunt says a
Conservative pledge to make primary school children resit Sats is «a terrifying admission of failure» with their
education policy.
Welsh
Conservatives would reverse the current centralised
education policies of the Welsh Assembly Government.
Federal involvement in
education has trended up consistently, aided and abetted by
conservatives who might have been expected to prefer local or state or family control of
education decisions but instead expanded federal influences that favored their
policy preferences, e.g., No Child Left Behind.
Paul Peterson interviews Robert Shapiro, an expert on public opinion, about how the partisan divide in
education policy is shifting, as issues of school quality and accountability have produced «conflicted liberals,» at the same time that the presidential election is creating «conflicted
conservatives.»
In a 2011 speech to the
Conservative Political Action Conference, Romney berated Obama for failed economic
policies, saying afterward that he's «seen the failure of liberal answers before... liberal
education policies fail our children today because they put pensions and privileges for the union bosses above our kids.»
The papers, released in a joint effort by the
conservative - leaning Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive
Policy Institute, the research arm of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council, are aimed at influencing the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act, planned for next year.
Conservative scholars and
policy makers Abigail and Stephen Thernstrom followed suit soon after, and Bush's first Secretary of
Education, Rod Paige, has just coauthored a book called The Black - White Achievement Gap: Why Closing It Is the Greatest Civil Rights Issue of Our Time.
Do
conservatives want to continue to live under a waiver
policy that grants the U.S. Department of
Education the authority to micromanage states» annual tests, accountability systems, and teacher evaluation approaches?
The brainpower and
policy energy needed to prepare for that enormous undertaking isn't going to be available if
conservatives in the
education space spend all their time battling against the «tight» part of the deal.
For decades,
conservatives have generally followed two principles when it comes to federal K — 12
education policy: Respect state and local control of schools, and demand improved academic achievement in exchange for federal funds.
The key bulwarks against this kind of mission creep are, first, a definitive, public statement from the President - elect on the administration's position on Uncle Sam's role in schools; and, second, absent that,
education officials» deep familiarity with today's
policy issues and ability to apply
conservative principles to them.
By choosing the talented Betsy DeVos as his nominee to be Secretary of
Education, President - elect Trump might have intimated a
policy - by -
conservative - principles approach.
But there's an argument to be made that the apogee of
conservative social
policy was actually in the 1990s, with tough - on - crime laws, which broke the back of a crack - fueled murder wave; welfare reform, which reined in government dependency; and
education reform, which curbed monopoly power of the teachers» unions in our big cities.
That's a shame, because there is a small - c
conservative vision for federal
education policy that has real merit.
It's still possible at a fairly high level of abstraction to join moderate liberals and moderate
conservatives around some key principles of
education reform, much as the state - based reform groups joined under the loose umbrella of Policy Innovators in Education in their statement of «commitment
education reform, much as the state - based reform groups joined under the loose umbrella of
Policy Innovators in
Education in their statement of «commitment
Education in their statement of «commitments.»
It's an experiment that — while proven successful in at least two other states — has its origins in a Democratic President's administration and comes fresh off of lawmakers» brush with Common Core state standards, a broad - reaching
education policy that blew up into a toxic political football among
conservatives because it de-emphasized local control.
«When a Democratic secretary of
education goes to the NEA and mentions merit pay explicitly as something that has to happen, the ground has shifted,» said Frederick Hess, director of
education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a
conservative think tank in Washington, D.C.