Although the self - publishing alternative becomes more valid and tempting every day, many traditionally - minded authors still fail to
consider author publishers as their peers, and often disregard all independent publishing efforts as vanity publishing.
Not exact matches
Authors: Patrick Demarchelier (Photographer), Ingrid Sischy (
Author) Hardcover; 239 pages; photographs
Publisher: Rizzoli Suggested Retail: $ 115 In no way should this be
considered a complete record of the fashion house established by Christian Dior shortly after World War II — but it is perhaps the most gorgeous.
On the other hand, some religious book
publishers actively require their
authors to produce what I
consider bad prose: obvious, sentimental, contrived, cute and preachy.
Few educational
publishers have the ability to
consider these opportunities for their
authors.
In spite of my experience, I would advise first - time
authors to
consider an offer from a traditional
publisher.
First - time
authors and those struggling to find a
publisher should seriously
consider self - publishing.
They no longer
consider using competing e-readers — which forces readers and
authors to accept whatever pricing Amazon negotiates with
publishers.
Modern
authors often choose the present tense to add edginess and immediacy to a story, but the more traditional use of past tense is generally better loved by big publishing companies, who are increasingly risk averse for financial reasons.Tales abound of
authors instructed by commercial
publishers to rewrite an entire book to change the tense from present to past, before thy'll
consider publishing it.
Title: The Fine Print of Self - Publishing
Author: Mark Levine Genre: Non-Fiction
Publisher: North Loop Books Release Date: 6th edition (June 5, 2016) Format: Digital & Paperback Pages: 307 The Fine Print of Self - Publishing, now in its sixth edition, has been lauded by industry professionals as the go - to book for
authors considering self - publishing.
As the executive editor at Foreword Reviews, I decide which
authors or
publishers might be worth
considering as a topic for a news story above and beyond a possible review we might run about the book itself.
It's fairly well - known that self - publishing once carried a stigma (some would argue it still does), and that it was
considered primarily a fall - back plan for
authors who couldn't find an agent or traditional
publisher to work with them.
This news should serve as a conversation starter for
authors and
publishers — especially smaller press publishing houses — who have yet to explore the options of international distribution, an important market option
considering the lack of available English language content in direct proportion to the numbers of English speakers in many of these countries.
Free Submission - All
authors and
publishers can submit their books to be
considered on the dates of their book promo.
In 2008 and 2009, the economy was so bad that the warnings to first - time
authors were the following: (1) Traditional
publishers are cutting way back and will seldom
consider new
authors.
-LSB-...]
authors, unless you
consider getting paid 70 % of the sale price for your book instead of the 17.5 % that
authors used to get from
publishers like Hatchett is hurting -LSB-...]
The days of needing a traditional
publisher to be
considered a «real»
author are long gone!
I met many
authors who have already had several books mainstream published, but the
publishers refused to take on the newer ones and they are «forced» to
consider their options.
It may also be
considered out of print for the purpose of reversion of rights to the
author if it is no longer available from the
publisher in any edition.
The looks on the faces of those who have never had to
consider the difference between what an
author earns on a book published by a legacy
publisher versus what that
author would make if she published the book herself told a story all unto itself.
With most agents, editors and
publishers expecting new
authors to have an already established
author's platform, it simply makes more sense to build that platform with real readers who enjoy your stuff before
considering the traditional publishing route.
Have to disagree with some of the points on trad publishing though - For the pros you neglected to mention that the
publishers distribute your book to all bookstores and e-books sites (hitting two marketing areas) A huge Pro
considering most
authors are battling to get their book seen and traditional publishing can do that.
Instead of relying on questionable reviews on sites that may be affiliated with these online
publishers, you can read the exact words of how other
authors and aspiring
authors feel about the publishing services you are
considering.
Readers have a growing number of tools to customize what they
consider literary fiction selections — these are books that meet their standards, interests and literary definitions, not a
publisher's or even an
author's.
I think this is a really sensible approach that benefits all parties and I'm surprised that traditional
publishers have been slow to «cream off» the best of the self - published digital market
considering the obvious advantages to them in terms of likely success of a new
author.
Considering the amount of time and money
authors and
publishers invest in a new book, it's no surprise that they would want to protect their work from piracy.
Featuring case studies, service analysis and the experiences of
author -
publishers and ALLi members, the guide is a timely and indispensable source of knowledge for anyone
considering self - publishing as an option.»
An article on Alan Rinzler's blog suggests that some
publishers are open to
considering previously self - published
authors as they -LSB-...]
Consider these statistics: New
Publisher House predicts that self - publishing could reach $ 52 Billion — or twice the size of book publishing in the US — with self - publish
authors projected to capture 50 % of the e-book market by 2020.
If you are a self - published
author who suddenly finds himself offered a contract by a legacy
publisher,
consider your options carefully.
Typography is a subject more indie
authors /
publishers should
consider, especially in an overall presentation of a book in its design — both interior and cover.
All
authors who publish on their own through Lulu, without any paid services, are
considered the sole content owners and
publishers of their work.
I review works of fiction primarily but will
consider non-fiction works if they are on a book - related topic (for example, about an
author, editor or
publisher).
I hate the prices that are charged by most
publishers for ebooks, especially
considering what the
authors actual make from those prices.
I do take it as a serious sign of the current trends, though, and any
author /
publisher should be listening closely and
considering new options for their business.
I'll of course
consider anything, as every situation is different, but my focus is finding those
authors I can pitch to the major
publishers and help take their careers to an entirely different level.
Winners of the Newbery Medal and Caldecott Medal also must be published by a U.S.
publisher and must be
authored by a writer
considered a resident of the United States.
FREE EBOOK Download your free copy of Ditch the
Publisher: 40 Indie
Authors on Their Unique Self - Publishing Journeys, an invaluable companion for writers
considering the self - publishing route.
Among indicators he calls out: community - building among
authors at Random House along with that
publisher's launch of what Howey
considers a very strong
author portal; HarperCollins» launches of its retail sites (US and UK); price experimentation; signs that contractual constraints could be loosening in some cases; and this:
A few days ago, I wrote a piece about self -
publishers not being
considered real
authors.
The
publisher, within the past five years, may not have charged a fee to
consider, read, submit, or comment on manuscripts; nor may the
publisher, or any of the executives or editors under its employ, have offered
authors self - publishing services, literary representation, paid editorial services, or paid promotional services.
Too many
publishers (especially small and digital - first
publishers) and
authors consider a book «edited» even if it's only been through copyediting.
The most successful
publishers and self - published
authors are those who understand that (1) publishing is a business, not a hobby; (2) have been tireless promoters of their books; and (3) fully realized that a book should be
considered as a financial «asset» and as such it should gain the largest return on investment as possible.
(In fact, traditionally published
authors might want to
consider which types of editing they're receiving before judging whether a
publisher's editing is «good» or «bad.»
It was my understanding
publishers need a book to sell at least 5k copies within the first three months to be
considered successful, and to
consider re-signing the
author's next book.
Filed Under: Book Industry Trends, How To Get Published Tagged With: Alan Rinzler, All Things
Considered,
author, book editor, developmental editor, editor, Jellybooks, Lynn Neary, NPR,
publisher, reader analytics
This section lists what the
author and
publisher might do in
considering the marketing and publicity behind the book's publication.
If either is true, you're firmly in the realm of old - school «vanity»
publishers that are generally
considered less
author - friendly than the new generation of service companies.
These terms in editing can be confusing to, not only new
authors, but the entire industry uses these terms interchangeably, and some folks view this type of editing as a line edit and another
publisher will
consider it copy editing.
FREE EBOOK Visit our sister site Whoosh Books to download your free copy of Ditch the
Publisher: 40 Indie
Authors on Their Unique Self - Publishing Journeys, an invaluable companion for writers
considering the self - publishing route.
While you're
considering publishing your next work, remember that the money flowing toward the
author comes from the
publisher even when you publish it yourself.